Skip to main content
4 of 4
deleted 238 characters in body
José Hdz. Stgo.
  • 8.8k
  • 4
  • 68
  • 106

There is a simpler way to derive the result from the approach mentioned by K. Conrad. You can find it in the following 1997 note by Paul T. Bateman:

Bateman, Paul T.: A theorem of Ingham implying that Dirichlet's L-functions have no zeros with real part one. L'Enseignement Mathématique. 43 (1997), 281-284.

José Hdz. Stgo.
  • 8.8k
  • 4
  • 68
  • 106