I got 2 well earned downvotes for a false belief I claimed proudly, it is time to balance that by exposing it here:
Let $(P,\le)$ be any poset, and let $\le^*$ be an order on $P$ extending $\le$. Any Endomorphism of $\le^*$ also is an endomorphism of $\le$
($f:P\to P$ endomorphism of $\le$ meaning $x\le y \implies f(x)\le f(y)$).
Of course this is a particular case of a very general fallacy: by extending $\le$ into $\le^*$ one weakens both the conclusion and the premise of the implication, so that there is no general relation between orders that extend one another.