Skip to main content
3 of 3
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/

You have omitted a crucial part of the sentence:

... in the sense of §16.

The point is small objects admit canonical basepoints via the augmentation of the Weil algebras defining them. See this MSE question for the definition of $\operatorname{Spec}_R(\pi)$ for the augmentation $\pi:W\rightarrow R$. The author's definition only asks for pullbacks involving these canonical base points.

For the dual numbers, this notion does pick zero as a basepoint, since dual numbers can be identified with $R^2$ with-dual-number-multiplication, making the projection of $\bar x=(0,x)$ clearly zero.

Arrow
  • 10.5k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 71