Skip to main content
2 of 2
Typo, and $\textbf{…}$ -> **…**, while this is on the front page
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Axiomatic approach to means

Recently I have been contemplating on a talk for high school children. One of my favorite topics in high school was the inequality of means. I had a great high school teacher who wrote some very nice articles (in Hebrew) about inequalities, so I was looking at some of them. This made me think about something I had wondered about when I was young, what does it mean a mean? Of course googling mean is not very useful. So I have two questions:

  1. Do you know about any axiomatic approach to means?

  2. Is it useful in anyway?

For instance, one could try and define a mean as a function $f:({\mathbb R}_{>0})^n \to {\mathbb R}$ which satisfies the following:

(i) $\min_i\{x_i\} \leq f(x_1,x_2,\dotsc,x_n) \leq \max_{i}\{x_i\}$.

(ii) $f(ax_1,ax_2,\dotsc,ax_n)=af(x_1,x_2,\dotsc,x_n)$.

(iii) $f$ is strictly monotone in each variable.

(iv) If, in addition, $f$ is preserved by any permutation of the $x_i$'s, then we call it symmetric.

If $f$ is not symmetric, then one can define $G_f$, the group of symmetries of $f$, to be the symmetries that preserve $f$.

Yiftach Barnea
  • 5.5k
  • 2
  • 38
  • 53