Skip to main content
2 of 3
Sorry I wrote poset instead of coset. Is this clear now? I mean we consider the fibre bundle G \to G/S^1.
András Szűcs
  • 2.3k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 18

Rhene Thom put the same question to Sullivan duaring Sullivan's talk at IHES in 1980: "Why Lie groups are null-cobordant?" Sullivan answered: "It follows from Thom's theorem" (A manifold is null-cobordant precisely when each of its characteristic numbers vanish.)

Thom: "OK, but can you prove this without this heavy tool?"

After few minutes Sullivan said:

"Take a circle subgroup in the Lie group. Take all the cosets. This gives a fibration with fiber G (the Lie group) and fiber S^1. Take the associted disc bundle. Its boundary is G." Q.E.D.

An elementary proof that paralellizable manifold is null-cobordant can be found in a paper by Buoncristiano- Hacon. I am not sure it gives oriented null-cobordism.

András Szűcs
  • 2.3k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 18