Skip to main content
2 of 2
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/

In question #14739, I asked whether the product of two ideals of a commutative ring $R$ could be defined lattice-theoretically the same way the sum and intersection can. Bjorn Poonen gave a great counterexample that shows the answer is no! This supports a point fpqc had been trying to make to me earlier that the relationship between $R$ and the Zariski topology on $\text{Spec } R$ was more subtle than I had thought: in particular, it has more structure than just the Galois connection.

Qiaochu Yuan
  • 118.2k
  • 40
  • 447
  • 741