Skip to main content
2 of 7
wording
Ilya Nikokoshev
  • 15.1k
  • 12
  • 77
  • 129

Why Todd classes appear in Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch formula?

Suppose for some reason one would be expecting a formula of the kind (did I get it right?)

$$\mathop{\text{ch}}(f_!\mathcal F)\ =\ f_*(\mathop{\text{ch}}(\mathcal F)\cdot t_f)$$

valid in $H^*(Y)$ where

  • $f:X\to Y$ is a proper morphism with $X$ and $Y$ quasiprojective,
  • $\mathcal F\in D^b(X)$ is a bounded complex of coherent sheaves on $X$,
  • $f_!: D^b(X)\to D^b(Y)$ is the derived pushforward,
  • $\text{ch}:D^b(-)\to H^*(-)$ denotes the Chern character,
  • and $t_f$ is some cohomology class that depends only on $f$ but not $\mathcal F$.

According to the Grothendieck–Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem this formula is true with $t_f$ being the relative Todd class of $f$, defined as the Todd class of relative tangent bundle $T_f$.

Now, I want to somewhow "derive" the above formula, but I suspect $t_f$ is not uniquely defined; perhaps you can change it by a homology class $t'$ with the property $\forall u\ f_*(\mathop{\text{ch}}(u)\cdot t') = 0$.

Question. Expecting the formula of the above kind, how to find out that $t_f = \text{td}\, T_f$?

I think one could add some kind of functoriality for $t_f$. You don't have to show this choice works, but you have to show no other choice works. Also, let's not use Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch: I'm curious exactly how and where Todd classes will appear.

Ilya Nikokoshev
  • 15.1k
  • 12
  • 77
  • 129