Questions tagged [type-theory]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
152 votes
5 answers
27k views

What makes dependent type theory more suitable than set theory for proof assistants?

In his talk, The Future of Mathematics, Dr. Kevin Buzzard states that Lean is the only existing proof assistant suitable for formalizing all of math. In the Q&A part of the talk (at 1:00:00) he ...
MWB's user avatar
  • 1,617
27 votes
5 answers
3k views

Formalizations of the idea that something is a function of something else?

I'll state my questions upfront and attempt to motivate/explain them afterwards. Q1: Is there a direct way of expressing the relation "$y$ is a function of $x$" inside set theory? More ...
Michael Bächtold's user avatar
23 votes
2 answers
2k views

Prospects for reverse mathematics in Homotopy Type Theory

Reverse mathematics, as I mean here, is the study of which theorems/axioms can be used to prove other theorems/axioms over a weak base theory. Examples include Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic (...
Jason Rute's user avatar
  • 6,257
33 votes
3 answers
5k views

Top-down mathematics, or "Where it all begins"

Sorry if this is off-topic. It was my attempt to take a top-down approach to mathematics. Being an inexperienced undergraduate (so please take my writing here lightly), I've been presented with ZFC as ...
steve's user avatar
  • 447
58 votes
8 answers
12k views

How true are theorems proved by Coq?

Less tongue in cheek, is it known what the relative consistency is for theorems proved with an automatic theorem prover? Of course this depends somewhat on what assumptions one makes with respect to ...
David Roberts's user avatar
  • 33.9k
21 votes
2 answers
1k views

$\infty$-categorical interpretation of type theory

One can read at several places that Martin-löf type theory should be the internal language of a locally Cartesian closed infinity category, and that the univalence axiom should distinguished infinity ...
Simon Henry's user avatar
  • 40.2k
19 votes
2 answers
1k views

Are we sure the calculus of inductive constructions and ZFC plus countably many inaccessible cardinals are equiconsistent?

This answer says, IIRC, the calculus of inductive constructions is equi-interpretable with ZFC plus countably many inaccessibles — see Benjamin Werner's "Sets in types, types in sets". (...
Hexirp's user avatar
  • 335
17 votes
1 answer
3k views

Forcing in Homotopy Type Theory

I apologize if this question doesn't make any sense. I'll just go ahead and delete it if that's the case. But the question is just the title. Is there a notion of forcing in homotopy type theory? ...
Jonathan Beardsley's user avatar
15 votes
2 answers
2k views

What is the status of (universal) algebra in type theory?

With the recent interest in homotopy type theory as a foundation for mathematics, it seems natural to develop algebra within the framework of type theory. So far, I can't find much literature ...
Cory Knapp's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
307 views

Feferman's universes for proof assistants?

This question was prompted by a discussion from another MO question about the consistency of ZFC. There are some mathematicians who are comfortable with ZFC but uneasy with large cardinals. For them,...
Timothy Chow's user avatar
  • 78.6k
3 votes
2 answers
493 views

Can we write Tangled Type Theory without reference to type sequences?

I just want to know if Tangled Type Theory $\mathsf{TTT}$ of Randall Holmes ([see: Holmes - NF is consistent, p:11, Holmes - The equivalence of NF-style set theories with “tangled” type theories; the ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar