Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
6 votes
0 answers
251 views

Whence compactness of automorphism quantifiers?

The following question arose while trying to read Shelah's papers Models with second-order properties I-V. For simplicity, I'm assuming a much stronger theory here than Shelah: throughout, we work in $...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
133 views

Comparing two fragments of SOL with the downward Lowenheim-Skolem property

For $S$ a set of (parameter-free) second-order formulas and $\mathfrak{A},\mathfrak{B}$ structures, write $\mathfrak{A}\trianglelefteq^S\mathfrak{B}$ iff $\mathfrak{A}$ is a substructure of $\mathfrak{...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
597 views

The "first-order theory of the second-order theory of $\mathrm{ZFC}$"

$\newcommand\ZFC{\mathrm{ZFC}}\DeclareMathOperator\Con{Con}$It is often interesting to look at the theory of all first-order statements that are true in some second-order theory, giving us things like ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
396 views

On the strength of higher-logic analogues of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ + Montague's Reflection Principle

Throughout, I work in $\mathsf{MK}$ in order to be able to conveniently quantify over logics; if one prefers, we can restrict attention to (say) $\Sigma_{17}$-definable logics and work in $\mathsf{ZFC}...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
242 views

Does second-order logic satisfy Craig interpolation for second-order languages?

(For simplicity, all languages are relational.) In analogy with first-order languages, say that a second-order language is a set of relation symbols of two kinds: first-order relation symbols and ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
655 views

Are there quantifiers that require multiple "steps" to define?

(Below I conflate quantifiers and quantifier symbols in a couple places for readability; I can change that if that actually makes things less readable.) For the purposes of this question, an $n$-ary ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
394 views

Do second-order theories always have irredundant axiomatizations?

It's a standard exercise to show that every countable first-order theory has an irredundant axiomatization. For uncountable first-order theories, the result is much more difficult and was proved by ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
151 views

How big a "scaffold" does second-order logic need to detect its own equivalence notion?

(Previously asked and bountied at MSE:) Let $\Sigma$ be the language consisting of a single binary relation symbol. Second-order logic can "detect" second-order-elementary-equivalence of $\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
171 views

Can SOL characterize its own equivalence notion, without "scaffolding," for graphs?

Consider the following property $(*)_\mathcal{L}$ of a logic $\mathcal{L}$: $(*)_\mathcal{L}:\quad$ There is no $\mathcal{L}$-sentence $\varphi$ such that for all graphs $\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B}$ we ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
273 views

Can the forcing-absolute fragment of SOL have a strong Lowenheim-Skolem property?

Previously asked and bountied at MSE: Let $\mathsf{SOL_{abs}}$ be the "forcing-absolute" fragment of second-order logic - that is, the set of second-order formulas $\varphi$ such that for ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
275 views

Does there always exist a categorical extension of $ZFC_2$ with no set models?

$ZFC_2$, i.e. second-order Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with Choice, has only one proper class model upto isomorphism, namely $V$. But it may or may not also have set models. If $V$ has no ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
627 views

Can there be no "surprisingly averageable" second-order sentences?

Say that a second-order sentence $\varphi$ is averageable iff there exists some infinite cardinal $\kappa$ and some nonprincipal ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on $\kappa$ such that for every $\kappa$-...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
392 views

Does "agreement on cardinalities" imply second-order elementary substructurehood?

Say that a logic $\mathcal{L}$ satisfies the weak test property iff for all $\mathfrak{A}\subseteq\mathfrak{B}$ we have $(1)\implies(2)$ below: For each $\mathcal{L}$-formula $\varphi$ with ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
367 views

Compatibility of Łośian phenomena in second-order logic

(Throughout, all ultrafilters are nonprincipal.) Given a property $P$ - really, a sentence in some appropriate logic - say that a ultrafilter $\mathcal{U}$ on a cardinal $\kappa$ averages $P$ iff for ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
380 views

Failure of "directedness" for second-order logic?

Say that a logic $\mathcal{L}$ is directed iff whenever $\mathfrak{A}\equiv_\mathcal{L}\mathfrak{B}$ there is some $\mathfrak{C}$ with $\mathcal{L}$-elementary substructures $\mathfrak{A}'\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
226 views

Second-order strong minimality and amorphousness, take 2

Recently I asked a question about whether a second-order analogue of strong minimality could correspond to amorphous satisfiability (= having a model whose underlying set cannot be partitioned into ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
683 views

Can second-order logic identify "amorphous satisfiability"?

Recall that a set is amorphous iff it is infinite but has no partition into two infinite subsets. I'm interested in the possible structure (in the sense of model theory) which an amorphous set can ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
292 views

Candidate "AEC-yielding" fragments of bad logics

Previously asked and bountied on MSE without success: Given a logic $\mathcal{L}$ and a signature $\Sigma$, let the $\Sigma$-system of $\mathcal{L}$ be the pair $Sys_\Sigma(\mathcal{L})=(Struc(\Sigma),...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
411 views

Compactness number for a fragment of second-order logic

Previously asked and bountied without response at MSE. This question is a companion to this one, about a tame(?) fragment of second-order logic with the standard semantics, $\mathsf{SOL}$, motivated ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
528 views

How many steps does it take to "Tarski-Vaughtify" second-order logic?

Given a regular logic $\mathcal{L}$, let $\preccurlyeq_\mathcal{L}$ be the usual elementary submodelhood relation for $\mathcal{L}$. There is also a separate submodelhood relation coming from the ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
16 votes
2 answers
1k views

How special is first-order $\mathsf{PA}$?

This is a modified version of a question which was asked and bountied at MSE without success. Below, "$\mathsf{PA}$" refers to first-order Peano arithmetic. There are various "...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
189 views

Reference requestion: theorem guaranteeing self-embeddings of expansions of $\mathit{Ord}$

This is an attempt to locate a theorem I vaguely remember but cannot find (which arose in the context of Consistency of non-trivial elementary embedding $j : \mathit{Ord} \to \mathit{Ord}$ and ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
249 views

Number of models vs. complexity for SOL theories

This was previously asked at MSE without success. Suppose $T$ is a complete first-order theory with continuum-many countable models up to isomorphism. We define two sets of Turing degrees associated ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
610 views

Preservation results in abstract logics

In retrospect the original version of this question was impossibly bloated. Here's a better version: There are many results about when first-order sentences are preserved by algebraic operations on ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
13 votes
2 answers
1k views

The (non-)absoluteness of second-order elementary equivalence

Elementary equivalence is set-theoretically absolute between any two transitive models of set theory; this is also true for the infinitary logics - e.g., $\mathcal{L}_{\omega_1\omega}$ - at least, ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
16 votes
3 answers
1k views

Vopěnka's Principle for non-first-order logics

(For simplicity, the background theory for this post is NBG, a set theory directly treating proper classes which is a conservative extension of ZFC.) Vopěnka's Principle ($VP$) states that, given any ...
Noah Schweber's user avatar