All Questions
11 questions
26
votes
6
answers
3k
views
Is there a metamathematical $V$?
As with many of you, I've been following Peter Scholze's recent question about universes with great interest. In ring theory, we don't often have to deal with proper classes, but they occasionally ...
- 2,031
2
votes
0
answers
2k
views
Compatible and incompatible sets [closed]
Definition of the compatibility relation
I have defined a relation $\mathsf{C}$ for sets that captures (to some extent) the notion of compatibility.
In order to do this, we need an operation $': \...
CommunityBot
- 1
2
votes
0
answers
325
views
The universe and multiverse views of set theory from the perspective of $ZFC^2$
(Note: the 'Second-order $ZFC$' ($ZFC^2$) I am talking about is the theory [in the second order language of set theory consisting of a single non-logical symbol $\in$ ] consisting of the axioms ...
CommunityBot
- 1
0
votes
2
answers
582
views
Why are model theorists free to use GCH and other semi-axioms? [closed]
Looking into the open problem section of the book Model theory by Chang and Keisler, I noticed that many problems assumed semi-axioms like GCH. I talk about 'semi-axioms' because these "axioms" are ...
- 5,031
4
votes
3
answers
915
views
Compactness of existential second order logic and definability of certain quantifiers
It is known (as a slogan) that the "existential fragment of second-order logic (ESO) is compact".
My first question is:
(1) Is ESO compact for:
(a) uncountable languages
(b) languages with ...
18
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Universe view vs. Multiverse view of Set Theory
Here I refer to Hamkins' slides:
http://lumiere.ens.fr/~dbonnay/files/talks/hamkins.pdf
particularly, to the "Universe view simulated inside Multiverse", p. 22.
My question is: is it very unsound ...
- 16.6k
2
votes
1
answer
880
views
Is second-order ZFC categorical with regard to its proper class models
Second-order ZFC offers partial categoricity in the sense that, given any two models, one of them must be isomorphic to an initial segment of the other [1]. However, this leaves questions regarding ...
- 236k
15
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Intended interpretations of set theories
In his Set Theory. An Introduction to Indepencence Proofs, Kunen develops $ZFC$ from a platonistic point of view because he believes that this is pedagogically easier. When he talks about the intended ...
CommunityBot
- 1
11
votes
2
answers
721
views
Inconsistency and workaday independence.
Set-theoretic topologists, for example, encounter many propositions that turn out independent from set theory. Sometimes these results require novel forcing arguments, but often they simply rely on ...
- 2,762
12
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Proving Independence of Axioms by Exhibiting Models Which Don't Satisfy Our Intuition
I recently saw the proof of the independence of ZF (with allowance for multiple empty sets) and AC. The proof constructed the model based on a set theory generated by infinitely many empty sets and ...
CommunityBot
- 1
11
votes
5
answers
9k
views
Models of ZFC Set Theory - Getting Started
For just any first-order theory: What are the sets I am supposed/allowed to think of when thinking of models as sets (of something + additional structure)?
Provided:
I can think of models of any ...
CommunityBot
- 1