Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
15 votes
5 answers
2k views

Intended interpretations of set theories

In his Set Theory. An Introduction to Indepencence Proofs, Kunen develops $ZFC$ from a platonistic point of view because he believes that this is pedagogically easier. When he talks about the intended ...
Marc Alcobé García's user avatar
11 votes
2 answers
721 views

Inconsistency and workaday independence.

Set-theoretic topologists, for example, encounter many propositions that turn out independent from set theory. Sometimes these results require novel forcing arguments, but often they simply rely on ...
David Feldman's user avatar
12 votes
5 answers
5k views

Proper classes and their consequences

I have two main questions: What is a proper class? I've read that it's collection of objects that's "too big" to be a set, but in what sense is such a collection "too big"? Since I'd like this post ...
Avi Steiner's user avatar
  • 3,079
21 votes
1 answer
3k views

Philosophical consistency proof for set theory

In his ASL Gödel lecture (Las Vegas, Nevada, 2002), Harvey Friedman asked the following question: Are there fundamental principles of a general philosophical nature which can be used to give ...
Lianna's user avatar
  • 261
31 votes
3 answers
5k views

Should there be a true model of set theory?

As I understand it, there is a program in set theory to produce an ultimate, canonical model of set theory which, among other things, positively answers the Continuum Hypothesis and various questions ...
Amit Kumar Gupta's user avatar
122 votes
4 answers
39k views

Is the analysis as taught in universities in fact the analysis of definable numbers?

Ten years ago, when I studied in university, I had no idea about definable numbers, but I came to this concept myself. My thoughts were as follows: All numbers are divided into two classes: those ...
Anixx's user avatar
  • 10.1k
67 votes
10 answers
14k views

Arguments against large cardinals

I started to learn about large cardinals a while ago, and I read that the existence, and even the consistency of the existence of an inaccessible cardinal, i.e. a limit cardinal which is additionally ...
user8996's user avatar
  • 825
18 votes
2 answers
3k views

Universe view vs. Multiverse view of Set Theory

Here I refer to Hamkins' slides: http://lumiere.ens.fr/~dbonnay/files/talks/hamkins.pdf particularly, to the "Universe view simulated inside Multiverse", p. 22. My question is: is it very unsound ...
Marc Alcobé García's user avatar
35 votes
8 answers
4k views

Interpretation of the Second Incompleteness Theorem

For simplicity, let me pick a particular instance of Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem: ZFC (Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory plus the Axiom of Choice, the usual foundation of mathematics) does not ...
Stefan Geschke's user avatar
12 votes
2 answers
2k views

Proving Independence of Axioms by Exhibiting Models Which Don't Satisfy Our Intuition

I recently saw the proof of the independence of ZF (with allowance for multiple empty sets) and AC. The proof constructed the model based on a set theory generated by infinitely many empty sets and ...
David Corwin's user avatar
  • 15.4k
14 votes
3 answers
2k views

Are there natural examples of mathematical statements which follow from consistency statements?

Motivation One of the methods for strictly extending a theory $T$ (which is axiomatizable and consistent, and includes enough arithmetic) is adding the sentence expressing the consistency of $T$ ( $...
Kaveh's user avatar
  • 5,502
26 votes
9 answers
8k views

Why are proofs so valuable, although we do not know that our axiom system is consistent? [closed]

As a person who has been spending significant time to learn mathematics, I have to admit that I sometimes find the fact uncovered by Godel very upsetting: we never can know that our axiom system is ...
9 votes
2 answers
2k views

Using the multiverse approach to decide the law of the exluded middle?

Recently, in response to deciding the Continuum Hypothesis $CH$, Hamkins and Gitman have proposed consider a multiverse of set-theoretic universes, some in which $CH$ is true, some in which $\neg CH$ ...
user avatar
39 votes
5 answers
6k views

Why do categorical foundationalists want to escape set theory?

This is a question that I have seen asked passively in comments relating to the separation of category theory from set theory, but I haven't seen it addressed in full. I know that it's possible to ...
Eric's user avatar
  • 855
11 votes
5 answers
9k views

Models of ZFC Set Theory - Getting Started

For just any first-order theory: What are the sets I am supposed/allowed to think of when thinking of models as sets (of something + additional structure)? Provided: I can think of models of any ...
Hans-Peter Stricker's user avatar
40 votes
5 answers
7k views

Were Bourbaki committed to set-theoretical reductionism?

A set-theoretical reductionist holds that sets are the only abstract objects, and that (e.g.) numbers are identical to sets. (Which sets? A reductionist is a relativist if she is (e.g.) indifferent ...
Jeremy Shipley's user avatar
17 votes
8 answers
2k views

The Importance of ZF

It seems as though many consider ZF to be the foundational set of axioms for all of mathematics (or at least, a crucial part of the foundations); when a theorem is found to be independent of ZF, it's ...
Jimmy Miller's user avatar

1 2
3