Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

Questions tagged [relation-algebra]

The tag has no usage guidance.

1
vote
1answer
56 views

Generalizing cycle/pseudo-tree factorizations for permutations/transformations to arbitrary binary relations

It's well known every permutation has a unique factorization into disjoint cycles (up to a re-ordering of these factors since they commute), while similarly it can be shown that every transformation ...
7
votes
1answer
471 views

Given any finite relation $R$ what is the cardinality of $\langle R\rangle=\{\underbrace{R\circ R\cdots \circ R}_{n\text{ times}}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$?

Given any finite relation $R$ if we let $\circ$ denote relation composition and define $R^n=\underbrace{R\circ R\cdots \circ R}_{n\text{ times}}$ then does there exist an explicit formula for the ...
-1
votes
1answer
110 views

Group associated to the monoid $({\cal P}(X\times X), \circ)$

Consider the set ${\cal P}(X\times X)$. It can be endowed with a binary operation $\circ$ where $$A\circ B = \{(a,b)\in X\times X:\exists z\in X((a,z)\in A\land (z,b)\in B)\}.$$ Note that $\Delta_X=\{...
1
vote
0answers
69 views

The relation on the set of functions

Let $\varphi: \mathbb{R}^{2} \to \mathbb{R}$ be a symmetric (not necessarily continuous) function (so, $\varphi(x,y)=\varphi(y,x)$ $\forall (x,y)\in \mathbb{R}^{2}$), let $\mathcal{F}$ be the set of ...
2
votes
2answers
527 views

Categories with binary relations as objects

For the category of functions, pairs of functions making commutative diagrams are the canonical morphisms $\alpha:f\rightarrow g$. For binary relations there is an alternative, to consider the ...
66
votes
13answers
4k views

Why is Set, and not Rel, so ubiquitous in mathematics?

The concept of relation in the history of mathematics, either consciously or not, has always been important: think of order relations or equivalence relations. Why was there the necessity of singling ...
2
votes
1answer
335 views

Why is a UNION operation independent in relational algebra?

Why is a set union operation independent in relational algebra? Why it cannot by expressed by the other four basic operations (selection, projection, cartesian product and difference)? What kind of ...
1
vote
0answers
141 views

Substitution semiring?

Let G be a [ CF ] grammar, and let elements of semiring be sets of rules. Define multiplication as: $$ x\otimes y = \{ t| \exists r \in x \exists s \in y (t=subst(r,s))\} $$ where $subst(r,s)$ ...
1
vote
2answers
431 views

Calculus of Binary Relations

I was reading "Origins of the Calculus of Binary Relations" by Vaughan Pratt where he says "it consists of two components, a logical or static component and a relative or dynamic component" but it ...