Skip to main content

All Questions

3 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
12 votes
0 answers
542 views

Does Wedderburn's Little Theorem hold constructively?

Wedderburn's Little Theorem states that every finite division ring is commutative. Perhaps even more surprising, this implies that every finite reduced ring is commutative. The proofs that I am aware ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
179 views

Elementary equivalence for rings

Let $\mathcal{L}$ be a first-order language, and $M$ and $N$ be two $\mathcal{L}$-structures. We say that $M$ and $N$ are elementarily equivalent (write $M \approx N$) if they satisfy the same first-...
jg1896's user avatar
  • 3,318
5 votes
0 answers
302 views

Reference for countable and uncountable algebraic closures of $\mathbb{Q}$ in ZF

The following facts seem to be part of the folklore (where $\mathsf{ZF}$ means Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with no axiom of choice): it is consistent with $\mathsf{ZF}$ that there exists an ...
Gro-Tsen's user avatar
  • 32.5k