All Questions
6 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
12
votes
0
answers
552
views
On a revised quantum Riemann hypothesis
This post provides a revision of the disproved quantum Riemann hypothesis proposed 2 years ago in this post, where you can refer to have more details about the motivations, the notations and the ...
8
votes
0
answers
306
views
Are there only finitely many maximal irreducible amenable subfactors at fixed finite index?
A subfactor $N \subset M $ is maximal if it admits no non-trivial intermediate subfactors $N \subset P \subset M $.
Question: Are there only finitely many maximal irreducible amenable subfactors at ...
4
votes
0
answers
190
views
A group-theoretical analogous of Temperley-Lieb-Jones subfactor planar algebras
The Temperley-Lieb-Jones subfactor planar algebra $\mathcal{TLJ}_{\delta}$ admits the following properties:
maximal,
it exists for every possible index, i.e. $\delta^2 \in \{4cos^2(\pi/n) \ | \ n \...
4
votes
0
answers
251
views
An embedding theorem for a fusion ring planar algebra?
We first recall the embedding theorem for finite depth subfactor planar algebras:
The planar algebra generated by a (finite depth) subfactor, is embeddable into the planar algebra generated by its ...
2
votes
0
answers
89
views
On the set of indices of irreducible depth 3 subfactors
Let $I_n$ be the set of indices of (finite index) irreducible depth $n$ subfactors. Then $I_2 = \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$.
Question 1: Is it true that $I_3$ has no accumulation point?
If so:
...
1
vote
0
answers
174
views
The planar algebra generated by the biprojections
Let $(N_1 \subset M_1)$ and $(N_2 \subset M_2)$ be two irreducible finite index subfactors.
Let $\mathcal{B}_i$ be the set of all the biprojections of $\mathcal{P}_{2+}(N_i \subset M_i)$.
Let $\...