Skip to main content

All Questions

6 questions with no upvoted or accepted answers
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
12 votes
0 answers
552 views

On a revised quantum Riemann hypothesis

This post provides a revision of the disproved quantum Riemann hypothesis proposed 2 years ago in this post, where you can refer to have more details about the motivations, the notations and the ...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
306 views

Are there only finitely many maximal irreducible amenable subfactors at fixed finite index?

A subfactor $N \subset M $ is maximal if it admits no non-trivial intermediate subfactors $N \subset P \subset M $. Question: Are there only finitely many maximal irreducible amenable subfactors at ...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
190 views

A group-theoretical analogous of Temperley-Lieb-Jones subfactor planar algebras

The Temperley-Lieb-Jones subfactor planar algebra $\mathcal{TLJ}_{\delta}$ admits the following properties: maximal, it exists for every possible index, i.e. $\delta^2 \in \{4cos^2(\pi/n) \ | \ n \...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
251 views

An embedding theorem for a fusion ring planar algebra?

We first recall the embedding theorem for finite depth subfactor planar algebras: The planar algebra generated by a (finite depth) subfactor, is embeddable into the planar algebra generated by its ...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
89 views

On the set of indices of irreducible depth 3 subfactors

Let $I_n$ be the set of indices of (finite index) irreducible depth $n$ subfactors. Then $I_2 = \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Question 1: Is it true that $I_3$ has no accumulation point? If so: ...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
174 views

The planar algebra generated by the biprojections

Let $(N_1 \subset M_1)$ and $(N_2 \subset M_2)$ be two irreducible finite index subfactors. Let $\mathcal{B}_i$ be the set of all the biprojections of $\mathcal{P}_{2+}(N_i \subset M_i)$. Let $\...
Sebastien Palcoux's user avatar