Questions tagged [pbw-theorems]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1
vote
0answers
43 views

Questions of the paper “PBW-pairs of varieties of linear algebras”

I am reading this paper "PBW-pairs of varieties of linear algebras", the link is here:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00927872.2012.720867. At page 672, there is a definition of PBW-pair. ...
17
votes
1answer
395 views

Splitting the injection that you get from the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem

Let $\mathfrak g$ be a Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero, with universal enveloping algebra $U\mathfrak g$. By the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem one knows that $i:\mathfrak g \to U\...
2
votes
0answers
372 views

The existence of zero-divisors in the universal enveloping algebra of an infinite-dimensional Lie algebra

The intuition for this problem comes from $\S$17 Exercise 1 Humphreys' Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory which essentially asks us to use PBW in order to prove that if a Lie ...
7
votes
1answer
314 views

$U\left(\mathfrak a\right) \otimes_{U\left(\mathfrak a\cap\mathfrak b\right)} U\left(\mathfrak b\right) \cong U\left(\mathfrak a + \mathfrak b\right)$ over a ring containing $\mathbb{Q}$

While the Poincaré-Birkhoff-Witt theorem is usually proven (and sometimes even formulated) for free modules only, it is known (see also here) that it holds for arbitrary modules if the ground ring is ...
2
votes
1answer
458 views

What's an example of a commutative algebra over $\mathbb Q$ that fails to satisfy this version of the “PBW theorem”

In a recent question, I recalled the notion of differential operator, polyderivation, and principal symbol for a commutative algebra $A$ over some fixed commutative ring $k$. (I will not repeat those ...
9
votes
1answer
572 views

For which algebras does \{Differential Operators\} satisfy a PBW-like theorem?

Let $k$ be a commutative ring, $A$ a commutative $k$-algebra, and for some other part of why I'm asking this question I only care about the case when $k \supseteq \mathbb Q$. Recall the following ...
12
votes
2answers
987 views

Clifford PBW theorem for quadratic form

Update: now with a question 2 which is much more elementary (and should be well-known!). Let $k$ be a commutative ring with $1$. Let $L$ be a $k$-module, and $g:L\to k$ be a quadratic form, i. e., a ...