Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
6 votes
0 answers
158 views

Questions about the $K$-theory of the algebraic standard Podleś sphere

Given $\theta \in \mathbb{R}$ irrational, the $K$-theory of the smooth noncommutative $2$-torus $C^\infty_\theta(\mathbb{T}^2)$ is well understood in relation to that of the corresponding $\mathrm{C}^\...
2 votes
0 answers
202 views

The trigonometric $C^*$-algebra

The trigonometric $C^*$-algebra is the universal $C^*$-algebra generated by $\mathcal{G}=\{x,y,z\}$ subject to relations \begin{align}x^2=x=x^*, &\quad y^2=y=y^*\\ [x, z]=y, &\quad [y,z]=...
2 votes
0 answers
90 views

The group of quasi unitary elements of a (simple) Banach algebra

For a Banach algebra $A$ with invertible group $G(A)$ we define the following group: $$QG(A)=\{u\in G(A)\mid \;\text{the mapping}\; a\mapsto u^{-1} a u \;\text{is an isometry}\}$$ What is an ...
8 votes
2 answers
208 views

Generalisation of the equivalence between $C^*(H)$ and $C_0(G/H) \rtimes G$; induction of group actions on C*-algebras

There is a well known Morita equivalence between the group C*-algebra $C^*(H)$ and $C_0(G/H) \rtimes G$, where $H$ is a subgroup of $G$. The corresponding equivalence of representations is an ...
2 votes
0 answers
147 views

About the algebraic structure of the $G$-equivariant $KK$-theory

Let $ G $ be a second countable locally compact group. Let $ A $ and $ B $ be two $G$-$C^*$-algebras. Let $ KK^G (A, B) $ be the $G$-equivariant $KK$-theory of the pair $ (A, B) $. Could you tell me ...
3 votes
0 answers
166 views

"Somewhat connected" spaces or algebras

Before we state our question, we give a motivational simple example: Put $X$ for disjoint union of two circles. However $X$ is not a connected space but it has an open dense subset $U$ such that $U$ ...
20 votes
0 answers
827 views

Can we define spectral triples using the language of rigged Hilbert spaces?

The traditional mathematical approach to quantum mechanics, as developed by von Neumann, is based on Hilbert spaces and unbounded self-adjoint operators. Another approach, which more closely resembles ...
9 votes
0 answers
364 views

Geometric motivation behind the Fredholm module definition

If $A$ is an involutive algebra over the complex numbers $\mathbb{C}$, then a Fredholm module over $A$ consists of an involutive representation of $A$ on a Hilbert space $H$, together with a self-...
8 votes
1 answer
571 views

Comparing the definitions of $K$-theory and $K$-homology for $C^*$-algebras

In Higson and Roe's Analytic K-homology, for a unital $C*$-algebra $A$, the definitions of K-theory and K-homology have quite a similar flavor. Roughly, the group $K_0(A)$ is given by the ...
7 votes
0 answers
174 views

How does the $C^\ast$ algebra of an orbifold grupoid relate to the corresponding orbifold?

My question is in nature a bit vague but let me try to make it concrete. Given a Lie grupoid $G$ that is étale and proper (called an orbifold grupoid) we have an associated orbifold $X$; this is ...
7 votes
1 answer
219 views

$*$-algebras, completions, and $K$-theory

What is an example of a $*$-algebra $\cal{A}$, which admits two non-equivalent norms $\| \cdot \|_1$ and $\| \cdot \|_2$, with respect to which we can complete $\cal{A}$ to give two $C^*$-algebras $...
4 votes
0 answers
247 views

Dense subalgebra of continuous functions with same K -theory

Suppose $X$ is a compact metric space. Is there a good candidate for a dense subalgebra $A\subseteq C(X)$, such that the inclusion induces an isomorphism in $K$-theory? For example, if $X$ was a ...
4 votes
0 answers
398 views

Bott-type projections in $C^*$-algebras

Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $a\in A$. If $aa^*+1$ is invertible in $A$ then the element $$\beta(a)=(aa^*+I)^{-1}\left(\begin{array}{cc}aa^* & a \\a^* & I\end{array}\right)$$ is an ...
8 votes
1 answer
422 views

K theory for pre $C^*$-algebras

In noncommutative geometry when one want to go to the differentiable level, one is forced to work with algebras which are no longer $C^*$. It is nice if we don't loose much information by the ...
7 votes
0 answers
437 views

K theory as the fundamental group

There are several ways in which one can define $K$-theory for $C^*$-algebras: for $K_0(A)$ group two aproaches: algebraic (using idempotents) and topological (using projections, i.e. self-adjoint ...
6 votes
1 answer
550 views

A generalized K- theory via generalized idempotents

Edit After the answer by Neil Strickland, I add the word "a ring" in this new version. In the literature, there is a concept of generalized idempotent: an n- idempotent is an element $a$ of a Banach ...
2 votes
0 answers
254 views

isomorphism of Chern character in kk-theory

Suppose we work with Fréchet algebras. Cuntz defined kk-theory for those algebras and hence we have the notions of K-theory and K-homology for those algebras. Now suppose Chern character is ...
4 votes
1 answer
362 views

$K$-Theory of finite dimensional Banach algebras

Is there a finite dimensional Banach algebra $A$ for which $K_{0}(A)$ is a finite group? I asked this question in MSE but I received no answer https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1624250/...
3 votes
1 answer
293 views

Is the square diagram of index and exponential maps in $K$-theory of $C^*$-algebras anti-commutative?

Assume we have a $3\times 3$ grid with rows and columns being short exact sequences of $C^*$-algebras. This gives a grid of 6-term exact sequences: 3 "horizontal" sequences and 3 "vertical" sequences,...
8 votes
2 answers
836 views

Projective modules over noncommutative tori?

It is a theorem of Rieffel that for any simple noncommutative tori ($\mathcal{A}$) of dimension $n$, every projective module over it is isomorphic to direct sum of $\mathcal{S}(M)$, Schwartz class ...
0 votes
0 answers
410 views

A noncommutative vector bundle

We know that a noncommutative vector bundle is a finitely generated projective $A$-module where $A$ is a non commutative $C^{*}$ algebra. In this question we introduce a particular non commutative ...