All Questions
Tagged with noncommutative-geometry cyclic-homology
14 questions
4
votes
1
answer
216
views
On Connes' fomulae of pairing between cyclic cohomology and K-theory
The following proposition comes from Connes' paper in IHES. See the link Non-commutative differential geometry.
On page 109, Proposition 15. of Part II, he claims that
(1) The following equality ...
3
votes
0
answers
81
views
The Loday-Quillen-Tsygan theorem for topological (Fréchet) algebras
In "Additive K-theory" by Tsygan and Feigin, Section 0.4, a statement is given which seems to generalize (cohomological version of) the well-known Loday-Quillen-Tsygan theorem
$$H_{\text{CE}}...
2
votes
0
answers
132
views
Relative de Rham Cohomology groups of k-algebra
Let $A$ be a commutative unital $k$-algebra. Then we have de Rham complex given as:
$C_{\ast}(A)$ : $ 0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow \Omega_{A \lvert k}^{1} \rightarrow \Omega_{A \lvert k}^{2} \...
1
vote
0
answers
61
views
A 2- cocycle $\tau$ which is not cyclic but it still satisfies the stability of $\tau(e,e,e)$ for idempotent $e$
I learned the following statement from page $20$ of the book Noncommutative Geometry by Alain Connes:
Let $\tau$ be a $2$-cyclic cocyle on a $C^*$ algebra. Then for every smooth curve $e(t)$ of ...
5
votes
0
answers
183
views
Connes-Chern pairing, compatibility with periodicity operator in the odd case
Let $A$ be an algebra (say unital). For an odd (say $2n-1$) cyclic cocycle $\varphi$ and a class in $K_1(A)$ represented by invertible $u$ we define
$$\langle [\varphi],[u] \rangle:=\frac{2^{-(2n+1)}}...
3
votes
0
answers
209
views
Pairing between cyclic cohomology and $K$-theory: the odd case
I would like to understand the proof of Proposition 15 (see page 70 in this link ). More precisely: I would like to understand a particular step in the proof namely:
Why $\frac{d}{dt}(\varphi \# ...
5
votes
1
answer
354
views
Two approaches to periodic cyclic cohomology
Cyclic cohomology may be defined in several ways: the easiest way to define it is via a subcomplex $C^*_{\lambda}$of Hochschild complex consisting from cyclic cochains. There are also other ...
2
votes
0
answers
85
views
Relative version of Hopf cyclic cohomology
In this paper Connes and Moscovici introduced the Hopf algebra of transverse differential operators in order to compute the index formula for the diffeomorphism invariant geometry. They developed the ...
4
votes
0
answers
247
views
Dense subalgebra of continuous functions with same K -theory
Suppose $X$ is a compact metric space. Is there a good candidate for a dense subalgebra $A\subseteq C(X)$, such that the inclusion induces an isomorphism in $K$-theory?
For example, if $X$ was a ...
2
votes
1
answer
316
views
Normalization of cyclic cocycles
This question is a continuation of the discussion
Normalization of Hochschild cocycles
but this time in the cyclic context. I would like to ask whether the following is true:
The inclusion of ...
3
votes
0
answers
98
views
Quasi isomorphism for bicomplexes both defining cyclic cohomology
Let $A$ be a complex unital algebra. Consider the cyclic (cohomological) bicomplex $\mathcal{C}(A)$. This is a bicomplex
where in the $p$-th row one has $C^p(A)$ (the space of all $p+1$-linear forms) ...
7
votes
0
answers
300
views
Injectivity of the Chern character in $K$-homology
Let $(\pi,H,F)$ be a Fredholm module: here $\pi:A \to B(H)$ is a representation of an algebra on the Hilbert space $H$ and $F$ is a self adjoint operator with square one such that for each $a \in A$ ...
8
votes
1
answer
601
views
Isomorphism in cyclic cohomology vs isomorphism in Hochschild cohomology
Let $A$ be a unital algebra over a field $K$, $C^n(A)$ a space of all $n+1$ linear maps into scalar field $k$ (I'm interested in case $k=\mathbb{C}$) and
$$(bf)(a_0,...,a_{n+1})=\sum_{i=0}^n(-1)^if(...
5
votes
0
answers
490
views
Soft Question: What does periodic cyclic theory measure?
Ex1) The cyclic homology of $\mathbb{C}[X,Y]$ and that of the algebra of functions on the sphere $S^2$ have the same periodic cyclic homology. Clearly, however, these objects are topologically very ...