Questions tagged [non-archimedean-fields]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
11
votes
5answers
2k views

analysis over non-Archimedean ordered fields

Can anyone suggest any good references for (or any experts on) analysis over non-Archimedean ordered fields, such as the field of rational functions in one variable (ordered at 0, or if you prefer at ...
11
votes
1answer
649 views

bornological vector spaces over a non-archimedean field

Let $k$ be a complete non-archimedean field. In definitions I have seen of bornological vector spaces over $k$ there are usually some extra assumptions on the non-archimedean field. For instance in '...
10
votes
2answers
896 views

Does Rolle's Theorem imply Dedekind completeness?

I think the answer to the title question is "yes", but Gerald Edgar, in his comment on Does antidifferentiability of continuous functions imply Dedekind completeness? , points out an article (actually ...
3
votes
1answer
292 views

Tate algebras and fundamental theorem of algebra

Let $\mathbb K$ be an algebraically-closed complete non-archimedean field whose absolute value is non-trivial. Consider the Tate algebra $T_n=\mathbb K\langle X_1,\dots, X_n \rangle$ and fix $f\in T_n$...
4
votes
1answer
134 views

Significance of integrally closed in an affinoid algebra

A Tate affinoid k-algebra is defined as a pair $(R,R^+)$ where $R$ is a Tate algebra and $R^+$ is an open and integrally closed subring of $R$ contained in the ring of powerbounded elements. See for ...