Skip to main content

Questions tagged [motivic-cohomology]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
71 votes
1 answer
8k views

What is the relationship between motivic cohomology and the theory of motives?

I will begin by giving a rough sketch of my understanding of motives. In many expositions about motives (for example, http://www.jmilne.org/math/xnotes/MOT102.pdf), the category of motives is defined ...
Makhalan Duff's user avatar
39 votes
3 answers
6k views

What do higher Chow groups mean?

Let $z^i(X, m)$ be the free abelian group generated by all codimension $i$ subvarieties on $X \times \Delta^m$ which intersect all faces $X \times \Delta^j$ properly for all j < m. Then, for each i,...
Peter Arndt's user avatar
  • 12.3k
37 votes
6 answers
6k views

Why is Milnor K-theory not ad hoc?

When Milnor introduced in "Algebraic K-Theory and Quadratic Forms" the Milnor K-groups he said that his definition is motivated by Matsumoto's presentation of algebraic $K_2(k)$ for a field $k$ but is ...
user717's user avatar
  • 5,243
26 votes
1 answer
1k views

What's motivic about $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy theory? What's motivic about correspondences?

I come today to mathoverflow to showcase some genuine confusion about the motivic world. I want to ask some questions before actually starting to study the subject, to build some sense of direction. I ...
display llvll's user avatar
22 votes
2 answers
6k views

Beilinson conjectures

Continuing an amazingly interesting chain of answers about motivic cohomology, I thought I should learn about the Beilinson conjectures, referred there. I have found some references, and they seem to ...
Ilya Nikokoshev's user avatar
22 votes
3 answers
3k views

Homotopy theory of schemes examples

Is it possible give an example of (or explain) how the Voevodsky et al.'s homotopy theory of schemes computes higher Chow groups?
Ilya Nikokoshev's user avatar
22 votes
1 answer
2k views

Motivic Cohomology vs. Chow for singular varieties?

I'm absolutely new to this stuff I'm asking about, so I hope this is not nonsense. If X is a smooth scheme over a perfect field k, I can study its motivic cohomology in the sense of Voevodsky and ...
Timo Schürg's user avatar
  • 3,917
21 votes
1 answer
2k views

Spectral sequences in $K$-theory

There is an algebraic analogue of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence from singular cohomology to topological $K$-theory of a topological space. For a field $k$, let $X$ be smooth variety $X$ ...
user avatar
21 votes
0 answers
1k views

What is the current knowledge of equivariant cohomology operations?

In Caruso's paper, "Operations in equivariant $Z/p$-cohomology," http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1684248, he shows that the integer-graded stable cohomology operations in $RO(\mathbb{Z}/p)$-...
Bill Kronholm's user avatar
18 votes
4 answers
2k views

Applications of homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky

One of the most important theorems in motivic homotopy theory is the homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky which says that the motivic Thom space of the normal bundle $\mathcal N_{Z/X}$ of a ...
Carl's user avatar
  • 805
18 votes
1 answer
1k views

Which motivic cohomology groups of complex numbers are non-torsion?

I would like to know which motivic cohomology groups of complex numbers are non-zero and ("better") non-torsion, i.e., for which $(i,j)$ the $i$th cohomology of the complex ${\mathbb{Q}}(j)$ over $\...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
18 votes
1 answer
853 views

Can we reconstruct positive weight invariants in algebraic topology using algebraic geometry?

I can't really say that I understand what a weight is, but the qualitative distinction between weight zero and positive weight has come up a couple times in MathOverflow questions: The étale ...
S. Carnahan's user avatar
  • 45.7k
17 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why presheaves with transfer?

Presheaves with transfer are a main technical ingredient in Voevodsky's construction of his category of mixed motives. From the perspective of motivic homotopy theory, the only difference between SH ...
Fabian Carlström's user avatar
16 votes
4 answers
2k views

Relation between motivic homotopy category and the derived category of motives

What's the relation between the pointed motivic homotopy category $\mathcal{H}_*(k)$ and the derived category of motives $\mathbf{DM}^-_{eff}(k)$ besides the representability of motivic cohomology in ...
user avatar
16 votes
1 answer
1k views

Motivic cohomology with finite coefficients for singular varieties

Let $X$ be a smooth variety over a field $K$ whose characteristic does not divide a positive integer $m$. Then the motivic cohomology of $X$ with coefficients in $\mathbb Z/m(j)$ can be computed in ...
Leonid Positselski's user avatar
15 votes
3 answers
3k views

State of the art for Gersten's conjecture for K-theory?

Does anyone know (of a reference to) under what restrictions on the regular scheme $X$ it is known that we have an exact sequence $$0 \to \mathcal{K}_n(X) \to \bigoplus_{x \in X^{(0)}} K_n(k(x)) \to \...
name's user avatar
  • 1,347
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why $K(X) \longrightarrow G (X)$ is a Poincaré duality for K-theory?

It's well known that for Noetherian separated regular schemes the canonical map $$K(X) \longrightarrow G(X)$$ (Quillen uses $K'$ instead of $G$, though) is a weak equivalence. This statement is ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
14 votes
2 answers
2k views

Motivic cohomology and cohomology of Milnor K-theory sheaf

Let $X$ be a smooth variety over a field $k$. (Assume $k$ has characteristic 0 if it helps; in fact I'd be happy to assume that $k$ is a finite extension of either $\mathbf{Q}$ or $\mathbf{Q}_p$). ...
David Loeffler's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
746 views

Can there exist Chow motives/motivic cohomology for compact Kähler manifolds?

Can there exist a 'reasonable' extension of the (higher) Chow groups of complex smooth projective algebraic varieties to functors on the category of compact Kähler manifolds? Are there any ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
14 votes
1 answer
1k views

Motivic cohomology vs. K-theory for singular varieties

As far as I understand, for a smooth variety $X$ its motivic cohomology could be described as the corresponding piece of the $\gamma$-filtration of (Quillen's) $K^*(X)$; this is completely true for $\...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is Deligne cohomology the motivic cohomology of analytic spaces?

Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space. We can cook up a complex analytic version of Bloch's cycle complex by declaring $z^n(X^{\rm an}, m)$ is the free abelian group on all ...
user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

Who proved the motivic 6-functor formalism?

In the recent beautiful talk "Motives and ring stacks" Peter Scholze states the theorem saying that there exists an initial 6-functor formalism on $\mathit{Sch}_\mathbb{Z}$ such that when $...
Ola Sande's user avatar
  • 705
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

Learning a little Motivic Cohomology

Simply because I find it interesting, I have spent some time studying motivic cohomology from the lectures by Mazza, Voevodsky and Weibel. However, I'm finding it hard to tell if the theory is ...
LMN's user avatar
  • 3,555
12 votes
1 answer
1k views

Formalism of homotopy theory of schemes

I have some vague knowledge about the philosophy that schemes should be thought of as similar to topologic spaces, and we should divide everything by homotopy, and that the space should be actually ...
Ilya Nikokoshev's user avatar
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

Motivic vs Deligne cohomology

Where can I find the construction of the cycle class map from motivic cohomology to Deligne cohomology of smooth projective varieties over the complex numbers? It should be a construction by Bloch ...
user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
410 views

Can Quillen-Lichtenbaum recover Borel's computation?

Borel famously used analysis on symmetric spaces to compute the rationalised algebraic $K$-theory groups of rings of integers $\mathcal{O}_F$ in number fields, e.g. $K_i(\mathbb{Z}) \otimes \mathbb{Q}...
skupers's user avatar
  • 8,167
12 votes
0 answers
340 views

Homology of Gersten complex for singular schemes

It is one of the important facts in K-theory/motivic cohomology that the Gersten-type complexes (for Quillen K-theory, Milnor K-theory or more generally Rost's cycle modules) are exact for smooth ...
Matthias Wendt's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
725 views

What is missing in the current constructions of pure and mixed motives?

Yo! Maybe this question is too broad, so maybe it should be community wiki? In summary, I want to known all the known comparisons between all the constructions of pure and mixed motives and what make ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
12 votes
0 answers
1k views

Are there analogues of Beilinson's conjectures for motives with coefficients?

There's a body of wisdom (following Beilinson, Bloch, Deligne, ...) relating mixed Tate motives, motivic cohomology, algebraic K-theory, special values of L-functions, and polylogarithms. My ...
JBorger's user avatar
  • 9,408
11 votes
6 answers
2k views

Kunneth formula for motivic cohomology

I was wondering when the Kunneth formula holds for motivic cohomology: $$ H^p(X,A(\alpha)) = \bigoplus_{i+j=p;\beta+\gamma = \alpha} H^j(X,A(\beta)) \otimes H^i(X,A(\gamma)) $$ where $H^p(X,A(\...
AFK's user avatar
  • 7,527
11 votes
1 answer
967 views

How to think about infinite generatedness of motivic cohomology

In this question I previously asked how to think about the motivic complex $\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}$, whose Zariski hypercohomology should morally be the "singular cohomology" $H^*((-)\wedge S^{2n}...
user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
917 views

Motivic cohomology and pushforward maps

I have a question about pushforward maps for the motivic cohomology groups $H^p(X, \mathbf{Q}(q))$, for $X$ a smooth variety over a characteristic 0 field. According to Mazza--Voevodsky--Weibel "...
David Loeffler's user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
2k views

When do the $\gamma$-filtration and codimension filtration of K-theory agree?

Let $X$ be a smooth quasiprojective algebraic variety over a field $k$. Then the $K$-groups $K_m(X)$ are defined, and there are two standard filtrations on them: the "codimension filtration" given by ...
David Loeffler's user avatar
10 votes
2 answers
534 views

A question about the vanishing of motivic cohomology in negative Tate twist

Let $DM_{\text{gm}}$ be the category of Voevodsky´s geometric motives. Let $p,q\in \mathbb{Z}$ be integers with $p<0$. Is it true that $$\text{Hom}_{DM_{\text{gm}}}(M_{\text{gm}}(X),\mathbb{Z}(p)[...
user438991's user avatar
10 votes
1 answer
743 views

Stable motivic cohomology with finite coefficients?

In this question, which attracted no responces so far, I've asked whether it is possible to extend the Beilinson-Lichtenbaum etale descent rule for motivic cohomology to singular varieties, in ...
Leonid Positselski's user avatar
10 votes
0 answers
286 views

Injectivity of regulator maps

Let $X$ be a scheme which is smooth and quasi-projective over $\operatorname{Spec} \mathbf{Z}[1/N]$, and let $\ell$ be a prime dividing $N$ (hence invertible on $X$). Then then there is a regulator ...
David Loeffler's user avatar
9 votes
4 answers
1k views

Correspondences in Topology

I had one or two little fights with correspondences in the context of algebraic geometry where an elementary correspondence $C:X\to Y$ of connected smooth $k$-Schemes seems to be defined as an ...
user2146's user avatar
  • 1,273
9 votes
2 answers
971 views

the graded pieces of the gamma-filtration of Quillen K-theory and Chow groups of a regular scheme

Let $X$ be a regular scheme and consider Grothendieck's $\gamma$-filtration $F^nK(X)$ on $K(X)$. For the graded pieces, one has $Gr^0K(X) = CH^0(X)$ and $Gr^1K(X) = \mathrm{Pic}(X) = CH^1(X)$. Does ...
user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
663 views

What is the etale sheafification of the (unramified) Milnor-Witt $K$-theory

I would like a reference/argument for the truth/falsity of the following statement: The etale sheafification of the unramified Milnor-Witt K-theory (Nisnevich) sheaves are the (etale sheafification ...
Elden Elmanto's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
703 views

Motivic cohomology is universal with respect to what (co)homology theories?

I have been told several times, at least implicitly, that motivic cohomology should be universal with respect to Bloch-Ogus cohomology theories. Is it proved somewhere or is it just some folk theorem? ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
9 votes
1 answer
643 views

Torsion in Deligne cohomology

Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space, $i,p\ge 0$ integers, $\mathbf{Z}(p)_{\mathcal{D}}$ the Deligne complex of $X$, $H^i_{\mathcal{D}}(X,\mathbf{Z}(p))$ its hypercohomology. What ...
user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
713 views

Bass' conjecture implies the Parshin's conjecture

In the appendix of this paper. It is proved that Bass' conjecture for $K_n$ implies the rational Beilinson-Soulé conjecture for $K_n$. Then at the end the author claims that the same method can be ...
user127776's user avatar
  • 5,901
9 votes
0 answers
463 views

Beilinson regulators and Bloch's mythological algebraic intermediate Jacobians

In the paper introducing his motivic cycle complexes, Bloch outlines a project he says he was going to return to in the future: Towards the end of page 270, he says, given a smooth projective variety ...
user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
262 views

Injectivity of map in Beilinson's conjectures

In Beilinson's conjectures on special values of L-functions, he uses the image of the motivic cohomology of a a regular proper model in the motivic cohomology of the generic fiber to state the ...
Thomas Geisser's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
1k views

Motivic cohomology of a point

I was wondering how much is known about the integral motivic cohomology groups of $\mathrm{Spec}\, k$, $H^{n,p}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\mathrm{Spec}\, k,\mathbb{Z})$. One knows that $H^{n,n}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\...
Anandam Banerjee's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
989 views

How to think about $\mathbf{Z}(n)_{\mathcal{M}}$

One definition of motivic cohomology for smooth schemes $X$ over a field, is via Friedlander-Suslin complexes. A refresher (you may skip to the question at the bottom) One defines (1) $z_n(X,d) :=$...
user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
426 views

When does the continuous Galois(=etale) cohomology of fields coincide with the naive one? Often true by the Bloch-Kato conjecture?

For a field $F$ I am interested in its $l$-adic (Galois=\'etale) cohomology; here $l$ is a prime distinct from the characteristic of $F$ (for simplicity one may assume that the latter is $0$). For $...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
467 views

Known norm varieties and the Bloch-Kato conjecture

The Bloch-Kato conjecture states that $K_M^n(k)/l \simeq H^n(k,\mu^{\otimes n}_l)$ for every $n,l$,while $l$ is invertible in $k$. A important part in the proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture is to ...
nxir's user avatar
  • 1,479
8 votes
0 answers
587 views

Values of cohomology theory on a point

$\DeclareMathOperator\Sm{Sm}$It is a well-known fact that in algebraic topology, generalized cohomology theories are determined by their values on the point. I was wondering whether anything similar ...
user127776's user avatar
  • 5,901
8 votes
0 answers
574 views

Reference request: Motivic Cohomology and Cycle class maps

For a smooth projective variety $X$ over any field $K$, Voevodsky showed in his paper ``Motivic Cohomology Groups Are Isomorphic to Higher Chow Groups in Any Characteristic" that the motivic ...
Jesse Silliman's user avatar