Questions tagged [motivic-cohomology]
The motivic-cohomology tag has no usage guidance.
198 questions
7
votes
1
answer
689
views
Two motivic complexes, compared
Bloch defines the motivic complexes $\mathbf{Z}(n)$ in his paper "Algebraic Cycles and Higher K-Theory" (1986).
Some references (that I currently am unable to track down) use $$\check{\mathbf{Z}}(n) :...
user120812
4
votes
0
answers
205
views
$\mathbf{A}^1$- contractibility
Suppose $U$ is an $\mathbf{A}^1$-contractible smooth scheme over a field $k$, that is, it is isomorphic to a point in the $\mathbf{A}^1$-homotopy category of smooth schemes over $k$.
Does motivic ...
user119470
11
votes
1
answer
967
views
How to think about infinite generatedness of motivic cohomology
In this question I previously asked how to think about the motivic complex $\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}$, whose Zariski hypercohomology should morally be the "singular cohomology" $H^*((-)\wedge S^{2n}...
user97068
8
votes
1
answer
989
views
How to think about $\mathbf{Z}(n)_{\mathcal{M}}$
One definition of motivic cohomology for smooth schemes $X$ over a field, is via Friedlander-Suslin complexes.
A refresher (you may skip to the question at the bottom)
One defines
(1) $z_n(X,d) :=$...
user97068
9
votes
1
answer
643
views
Torsion in Deligne cohomology
Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space, $i,p\ge 0$ integers, $\mathbf{Z}(p)_{\mathcal{D}}$ the Deligne complex of $X$, $H^i_{\mathcal{D}}(X,\mathbf{Z}(p))$ its hypercohomology.
What ...
user113393
5
votes
1
answer
482
views
Around algebraic equivalence of cycles
Let $k$ be a finitely generated field, $X$ a smooth projective $k$-variety, $\ell$ a prime number, $\ell\in k^{\times}$, $r\ge 0$ an integer.
The Tate conjecture asserts surjectivity of the cycle ...
user92332
9
votes
0
answers
463
views
Beilinson regulators and Bloch's mythological algebraic intermediate Jacobians
In the paper introducing his motivic cycle complexes, Bloch outlines a project he says he was going to return to in the future:
Towards the end of page 270, he says, given a smooth projective variety ...
user95222
12
votes
0
answers
340
views
Homology of Gersten complex for singular schemes
It is one of the important facts in K-theory/motivic cohomology that the Gersten-type complexes (for Quillen K-theory, Milnor K-theory or more generally Rost's cycle modules) are exact for smooth ...
- 17.4k
14
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Is Deligne cohomology the motivic cohomology of analytic spaces?
Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space.
We can cook up a complex analytic version of Bloch's cycle complex by declaring
$z^n(X^{\rm an}, m)$
is the free abelian group on all ...
user92332
12
votes
3
answers
2k
views
Motivic vs Deligne cohomology
Where can I find the construction of the cycle class map from motivic cohomology to Deligne cohomology of smooth projective varieties over the complex numbers?
It should be a construction by Bloch ...
user95222
4
votes
0
answers
350
views
Homotopical enhancements of cycle class maps
Fix a smooth projective variety $X$ over the complex numbers.
We write $H^n(X,\mathbf{Z}(d)) = \text{CH}^d(X, 2d-n)$ for Bloch's higher Chow groups.
Notation
For a field $k$, recall $\Delta^n_{k} :=...
user97068
5
votes
0
answers
512
views
Poincaré duality for motivic cohomology
Is Poincaré duality for étale motivic cohomology known for projective regular (not necessarily smooth, just regular) schemes over Dedekind rings?
More precisely, two questions. Let $f: \mathcal{X}\to\...
user92332
7
votes
1
answer
710
views
A question on Voevodsky´s categories
I want to try to understand the Voevodsky´s big triangulated categories of motives $DM$ and $DM^{eff}$. Unfortunately, I am being not able to find answers to the following, too vague, questions:
1.- ...
- 761
4
votes
0
answers
244
views
Effectivity and Lower Shriek for Voevodsky Motives
I am in a situation where I need a result of the following form. Suppose $X$ is a smooth $k$-variety, $U$ is a dense open subvariety with complement $Z$ a smooth divisor. Let $\pi^X:X\rightarrow\text{...
- 143
6
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Higher Chow groups revisited
Let $X$ be an algebraic variety over a field $k$.
Bloch defines the "algebraic singular complex" using the algebraic simplices
$$\Delta^n = \text{Spec}(k[x_0,\dots,x_n]/(x_0+x_1+\dots+x_n=1) \subset ...
user97068
21
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Spectral sequences in $K$-theory
There is an algebraic analogue of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence from singular cohomology to topological $K$-theory of a topological space.
For a field $k$, let $X$ be smooth variety $X$ ...
user87684
6
votes
0
answers
400
views
Hodge Realisation of Mixed Tate Motives
For a field $k$ which satisfies Beilinson-Soule vanishing conjecture, the from Levine's paper,
https://www.uni-due.de/~bm0032/publ/TateMotives.pdf
There exists an abelian category of mixed Tate ...
- 2,971
5
votes
1
answer
324
views
Nori's Mixed Motives and Realisation Functors
The conjecture 51 in Levine's Mixed Motives in Handbook of K-theory
http://www.math.illinois.edu/K-theory/handbook/1-429-522.pdf
states that the functor induced by $hs:\text{ECM} \rightarrow \text{...
- 2,971
4
votes
1
answer
182
views
Explicit description of Verdier quotient of effective motives
Let $DM^{eff}_{gm}(k)$ be the triangulated category of effective geometric motives over some field $k$ (in the sense of Voevodsky), and let $DM^{eff}_{gm}(k)(1)$ be its full triangulated subcategory ...
- 41
2
votes
0
answers
309
views
representability of étale and motivic cohomology by schemes
One has $\mathrm{H}^1_{\mathrm{et}}(X,\mathbf{G}_m) = \mathrm{H}^2(X,\mathbf{Z}(1)) = \mathrm{Pic}(X)$ (étale and motivic cohomology).
Is étale or motivic cohomology in other dimensions also ...
user19475
18
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Which motivic cohomology groups of complex numbers are non-torsion?
I would like to know which motivic cohomology groups of complex numbers are non-zero and ("better") non-torsion, i.e., for which $(i,j)$ the $i$th cohomology of the complex ${\mathbb{Q}}(j)$ over $\...
- 16.9k
2
votes
1
answer
367
views
Dualizability and motivic cohomology
Suppose $k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$. Let $A=\mathbb{Z}/\ell\mathbb{Z}$, $\ell$ a prime coprime to $p$. Denote by $MA$ the motivic Eilenberg-Maclane spectrum over $k$. Is ...
- 21
8
votes
0
answers
669
views
Arakelov Motivic Cohomology and Hodge Theory
Lately I have been studying these two papers (first and second) that introduce a new cohomology theory called Arakelov motivic cohomology. While most of the applications presented in the papers are ...
- 341
6
votes
1
answer
411
views
Obtaining the Hilbert symbol from cup product on motivic cohomology
Let F be a number field. Does the Hilbert symbols at the various places of F arise from the cup product on the motivic cohomology groups of Spec(F)? And if so, is it possible to interpret Moore's ...
- 61
7
votes
0
answers
480
views
Galois descent for etale motivic cohomology
I am interested in the map from etale motivic cohomology of a smooth and projective variety over a field $K$ to the Galois invariants of etale
motivic cohomology over the algebraic closure $\bar K$:
$...
- 1,553
17
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Why presheaves with transfer?
Presheaves with transfer are a main technical ingredient in Voevodsky's construction of his category of mixed motives. From the perspective of motivic homotopy theory, the only difference between SH ...
- 171
12
votes
0
answers
726
views
What is missing in the current constructions of pure and mixed motives?
Yo! Maybe this question is too broad, so maybe it should be community wiki? In summary, I want to known all the known comparisons between all the constructions of pure and mixed motives and what make ...
- 2,227
4
votes
1
answer
359
views
Proof of Theorem 6.8 in the paper "Singular homology of abstract algebraic varieties"
Background:
Theorem 6.8 in Suslin and Voevodsky's article "Singular homology of abstract algebraic varieties" states that there is an isomorphism between effective relative zero cycles $z_0^c(Z)^{eff}(...
7
votes
0
answers
209
views
Comparison of cdh and h cohomology
I expect that if $X$ is a finite type $k$-scheme, $k$ a field of characterisic $p$, then for primes $\ell\neq p$, $H^*_{cdh}(X;\mathbb{Z}/\ell\mathbb{Z})\cong H^*_{h}(X;\mathbb{Z}/\ell\mathbb{Z})$. Is ...
- 71
3
votes
0
answers
171
views
Vanishing of Zariski motivic sheaf
Let X be a smooth variety over a field. Is it true in general that the sheaf $\mathcal{H}^{r}(\mathbb{Z}(s))=0$ if $r>s \geq 0$? Here $\mathcal{H}^{r}(\mathbb{Z}(s))=0$ is the sheaf associated to ...
user97464
9
votes
0
answers
262
views
Injectivity of map in Beilinson's conjectures
In Beilinson's conjectures on special values of L-functions, he uses the image of the motivic cohomology of a a regular proper model in the motivic cohomology of the generic fiber to state the ...
- 1,553
5
votes
0
answers
172
views
Fulton's pullback vs. Pullback via Gersten complexes vs. Pullback coming from motivic homotopy SH(k)
Let $f: X \rightarrow Y$ be a morphism of smooth projective $k$-schemes (let's assume $f$ flat or even smooth). There is pullback in Fulton's style $f^*_{Ful}: CH^p(Y) \rightarrow CH^p(X)$ given by $[...
- 326
6
votes
0
answers
277
views
On non-vanishing of Milnor K-groups for infinite fields
It is well-known that for $n \geq 2$ and a finite field $k$, the Milnor $K$-group $K_n ^M (k)$ vanishes. I don't know who proved this first, but if curious, you may look at somewhere in Srinivas's ...
- 937
7
votes
1
answer
919
views
Intuition behind the definition of finite correspondences
Finite correspondences were introduced by Suslin-Voevodsky (if I am not wrong) to define motivic complexes that compute motivic cohomology. Let $X$ and be smooth separated schemes of finite type over ...
- 596
9
votes
0
answers
1k
views
Motivic cohomology of a point
I was wondering how much is known about the integral motivic cohomology groups of $\mathrm{Spec}\, k$, $H^{n,p}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\mathrm{Spec}\, k,\mathbb{Z})$. One knows that $H^{n,n}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\...
- 596
4
votes
0
answers
232
views
Motivic Interpretation of Rationally Trivial Cycles
The Chow groups are defined by taking groups of cycles modulo rationally trivial cycles. One then has a cycle class map to etale cohomology (over the base field), and for a number field, one expects ...
- 15.4k
9
votes
1
answer
663
views
What is the etale sheafification of the (unramified) Milnor-Witt $K$-theory
I would like a reference/argument for the truth/falsity of the following statement:
The etale sheafification of the unramified Milnor-Witt K-theory (Nisnevich) sheaves are the (etale sheafification ...
- 2,327
11
votes
1
answer
917
views
Motivic cohomology and pushforward maps
I have a question about pushforward maps for the motivic cohomology groups $H^p(X, \mathbf{Q}(q))$, for $X$ a smooth variety over a characteristic 0 field.
According to Mazza--Voevodsky--Weibel "...
- 37k
3
votes
1
answer
350
views
Do there exist nontrivial motivic cohomology operations preserving weights?
Suppose that for each field $F$ a linear map $X(F): H_M^{p,q}(F, \mathbb{Q}) \longrightarrow H_M^{p,q}(F,\mathbb{Q})$ is given, such that $X$ commutes with inclusions of fields and transfers for ...
- 4,316
2
votes
2
answers
737
views
Vanishing in etale motivic cohomology
As far as vanishing is concerned, the usual motivic cohomology has the following two properties (for a smooth scheme $X$ over a field):
$H^{p,q}(X, \mathbb Z) = 0$, if $p > q + dim(X)$; and
$H^{p,...
- 23
3
votes
1
answer
338
views
Reference request for the relation of Ext groups and bar construction
I need a reference for the description of Ext groups in mixed categories (i.e. abelian categories with a weight filtration and semisimple graded quotients) by using the bar complex, as mentioned in "...
- 4,484
6
votes
0
answers
165
views
Exactness of pure functors
I can't prove this lemma in "Notes on motivic cohomology, Beilinson, Macpherson, Schechtman":
Lemma. A pure functor is exact.
Definitions: A mixed category $\mathcal{M}$ is a $\mathbb{Q}$-abelian ...
- 4,484
8
votes
1
answer
426
views
When does the continuous Galois(=etale) cohomology of fields coincide with the naive one? Often true by the Bloch-Kato conjecture?
For a field $F$ I am interested in its $l$-adic (Galois=\'etale) cohomology; here $l$ is a prime distinct from the characteristic of $F$ (for simplicity one may assume that the latter is $0$).
For $...
- 16.9k
3
votes
1
answer
459
views
About embedding pure motives into the triangulated category of mixed motives and some further questions about motivic cohomology
I have tried reading some texts about motives, mainly motivic cohomology (Bloch's " Lectures on Algebraic Cycles", Voevodsky's "Motivic Cohomology" etc). However some things confused me. I don't know ...
- 2,227
0
votes
0
answers
288
views
What can one say about zero-cycle groups for products of Chow motives
What can one say about the Chow group of zero-cycles (up to rational equivalence) for a product of smooth projective varieties and Chow motives (so, I am interested in the kernel $Chow_0(P)\otimes ...
- 16.9k
1
vote
0
answers
179
views
Which "concrete" morphisms of varieties and motives induce bijections of their lower Chow groups?
This question is a continuation of Varieties with Chow groups supported in positive codimension: examples and properties?
What examples are known of morphisms of varieties and Chow motives (say, over ...
- 16.9k
4
votes
1
answer
912
views
Standard conjectures on positive characteristic
In this MO answer of M. Bondarko, he says:
"the Hodge conjecture implies all the Grothendieck's standard conjectures over base fields of characteristic 0..."
and in Remarks on Grothendieck's ...
- 545
2
votes
1
answer
749
views
Vanishing of Motivic Cohomology
In these notes, page $10$, bullet $(5)$, it is stated that if $X$ is a scheme of finite type over a field $k$, then the motivic cohomology $\mathrm{H}^{p,q}(X,R)$ of $X$ over $k$, where $R$ is a ring, ...
user62675
4
votes
0
answers
218
views
The 'most general' papers on rational Borel-Moore motivic homology and K'-theory?
There are two ways to define Borel-Moore motivic homology (of schemes) with rational coefficients: one should either consider certain complexes of algebraic cycles, or the $\gamma$-filtrations of ...
- 16.9k
1
vote
0
answers
176
views
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
user56696