All Questions
3 questions
2
votes
0
answers
326
views
Voevodsky's 'split standard triple' argument: an explanation; does it work with $Z/nZ$-coefficients?
For varieties over a perfect field (of some characteristic $p$ that could be 0) Voevodsky defines the notion of a 'standard triple' (see http://books.google.ru/books?id=TzUmk87bN9cC&pg=PA85&...
- 16.9k
1
vote
0
answers
213
views
Algebraic correspondence as morphisms in Betti cohomology
$\newcommand{\sing}{\mathrm{sing}}$Take a commutative ring $R$ and smooth projective complex varieties $X$ and $Y$. An element $\alpha\in CH^*(X\times Y)_R$ induces the algebraic correspondence for ...
- 349
1
vote
0
answers
176
views
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]
Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
user56696