Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
5 votes
1 answer
468 views

Any "motive"(-like) theory which can catch that cusp $y^2=x^3$ (and similar) are non-trivial?

Consider cusp $y^2=x^3$ which can also be described as $k[z]~without~z$ , taking $x=z^3,y=z^2$. Algebraically its $Spec$ is quite different from $k$. For example: it has plenty non-trivial "line-...
Alexander Chervov's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

Who proved the motivic 6-functor formalism?

In the recent beautiful talk "Motives and ring stacks" Peter Scholze states the theorem saying that there exists an initial 6-functor formalism on $\mathit{Sch}_\mathbb{Z}$ such that when $...
Ola Sande's user avatar
  • 705
2 votes
0 answers
158 views

Map between Mordell-Weil group and Ext of (Mixed) Motives

We know that the motivic cohomology of an abelian variety $A$ over a number field $k$ computes the Mordell-Weil group up to torsion, and so if we were to grant the existence and nice behaviour of ...
curious math guy's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
238 views

Functoriality conjectures on the slice filtration

Voevodsky wrote on his paper "Open Problems in the Motivic Stable Homotopy Theory, I" that Three other groups of conjectures in motivic homotopy theory, not included in to this paper, seem ...
Tintin's user avatar
  • 2,871
1 vote
0 answers
79 views

Localization with or without transfers

Let $Sh_{Nis}^{tr}$ be the category of Nisnevich sheaves with transfers of abelian groups over a perfect field. Let $u\colon Sh_{Nis}^{tr}\to Sh_{Nis}$ be the functor “forget transfers” and let $h_0^{\...
user197402's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
213 views

Algebraic correspondence as morphisms in Betti cohomology

$\newcommand{\sing}{\mathrm{sing}}$Take a commutative ring $R$ and smooth projective complex varieties $X$ and $Y$. An element $\alpha\in CH^*(X\times Y)_R$ induces the algebraic correspondence for ...
OOOOOO's user avatar
  • 349
1 vote
0 answers
260 views

Non-examples of mixed Tate motives

I was trying to find examples of schemes (preferably smooth) over $\mathbb{C}$ which have motives that aren't mixed Tate. I wasn't able to come up with anything or find an argument that's been written ...
Arpith's user avatar
  • 19
3 votes
0 answers
206 views

Generalization of conjectures involving Beilinson regulators

I had some questions about the Beilinson conjectures as mentioned in this page. I have to admit I do not know much about Deligne cohomology. The conjectures involve some form of comparison map between ...
user127776's user avatar
  • 5,901
8 votes
0 answers
587 views

Values of cohomology theory on a point

$\DeclareMathOperator\Sm{Sm}$It is a well-known fact that in algebraic topology, generalized cohomology theories are determined by their values on the point. I was wondering whether anything similar ...
user127776's user avatar
  • 5,901
26 votes
1 answer
1k views

What's motivic about $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy theory? What's motivic about correspondences?

I come today to mathoverflow to showcase some genuine confusion about the motivic world. I want to ask some questions before actually starting to study the subject, to build some sense of direction. I ...
display llvll's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
476 views

Arc space & formal loops in motivic integration

One of the most essential ingredients in the theory of motivic integration are the space of arcs of a given $k$-variety $X$. This is a scheme, whose $k$-rational points are the $k[[t]]$-valued points ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 6,028
1 vote
1 answer
245 views

Pseudo-Abelian Completion in the constrution of Motifs (by Y. Manin)

I reading Yuri Manin's famous paper on "CORRESPONDENCES, MOTIFS AND MONOIDAL TRANSFORMATIONS" and struggle with his definition for so called pseudo-abelian completion given on page 453 by a reason I ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 6,028
7 votes
1 answer
551 views

Motivation for Suslin’s Rigidity Conjecture

Suslin Rigidity conjecture states that motivic cohomology $$ H_{\mathcal{M}}^1(\operatorname{Spec}(F),\mathbb{Q}(n)) $$ of the field $F$ coincides with motivic cohomology for the subfield of ...
Daniil Rudenko's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
703 views

Motivic cohomology is universal with respect to what (co)homology theories?

I have been told several times, at least implicitly, that motivic cohomology should be universal with respect to Bloch-Ogus cohomology theories. Is it proved somewhere or is it just some folk theorem? ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
10 votes
2 answers
534 views

A question about the vanishing of motivic cohomology in negative Tate twist

Let $DM_{\text{gm}}$ be the category of Voevodsky´s geometric motives. Let $p,q\in \mathbb{Z}$ be integers with $p<0$. Is it true that $$\text{Hom}_{DM_{\text{gm}}}(M_{\text{gm}}(X),\mathbb{Z}(p)[...
user438991's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
574 views

Reference request: Motivic Cohomology and Cycle class maps

For a smooth projective variety $X$ over any field $K$, Voevodsky showed in his paper ``Motivic Cohomology Groups Are Isomorphic to Higher Chow Groups in Any Characteristic" that the motivic ...
Jesse Silliman's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
426 views

Blowup formula for motivic cohomology

If $X$ is a smooth projective variety over a field, $Z\subset X$ a smooth closed subvariety of codimension $d$, $X'\to X$ the blowup of $X$ along $Z$, there's the blowup formula $$H^j(X'_{et},\mathbf{...
user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
689 views

Two motivic complexes, compared

Bloch defines the motivic complexes $\mathbf{Z}(n)$ in his paper "Algebraic Cycles and Higher K-Theory" (1986). Some references (that I currently am unable to track down) use $$\check{\mathbf{Z}}(n) :...
user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
205 views

$\mathbf{A}^1$- contractibility

Suppose $U$ is an $\mathbf{A}^1$-contractible smooth scheme over a field $k$, that is, it is isomorphic to a point in the $\mathbf{A}^1$-homotopy category of smooth schemes over $k$. Does motivic ...
user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
967 views

How to think about infinite generatedness of motivic cohomology

In this question I previously asked how to think about the motivic complex $\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}$, whose Zariski hypercohomology should morally be the "singular cohomology" $H^*((-)\wedge S^{2n}...
user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
989 views

How to think about $\mathbf{Z}(n)_{\mathcal{M}}$

One definition of motivic cohomology for smooth schemes $X$ over a field, is via Friedlander-Suslin complexes. A refresher (you may skip to the question at the bottom) One defines (1) $z_n(X,d) :=$...
user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
643 views

Torsion in Deligne cohomology

Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space, $i,p\ge 0$ integers, $\mathbf{Z}(p)_{\mathcal{D}}$ the Deligne complex of $X$, $H^i_{\mathcal{D}}(X,\mathbf{Z}(p))$ its hypercohomology. What ...
user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
482 views

Around algebraic equivalence of cycles

Let $k$ be a finitely generated field, $X$ a smooth projective $k$-variety, $\ell$ a prime number, $\ell\in k^{\times}$, $r\ge 0$ an integer. The Tate conjecture asserts surjectivity of the cycle ...
user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
463 views

Beilinson regulators and Bloch's mythological algebraic intermediate Jacobians

In the paper introducing his motivic cycle complexes, Bloch outlines a project he says he was going to return to in the future: Towards the end of page 270, he says, given a smooth projective variety ...
user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
1k views

Is Deligne cohomology the motivic cohomology of analytic spaces?

Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex analytic space. We can cook up a complex analytic version of Bloch's cycle complex by declaring $z^n(X^{\rm an}, m)$ is the free abelian group on all ...
user avatar
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

Motivic vs Deligne cohomology

Where can I find the construction of the cycle class map from motivic cohomology to Deligne cohomology of smooth projective varieties over the complex numbers? It should be a construction by Bloch ...
user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
512 views

Poincaré duality for motivic cohomology

Is Poincaré duality for étale motivic cohomology known for projective regular (not necessarily smooth, just regular) schemes over Dedekind rings? More precisely, two questions. Let $f: \mathcal{X}\to\...
user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
710 views

A question on Voevodsky´s categories

I want to try to understand the Voevodsky´s big triangulated categories of motives $DM$ and $DM^{eff}$. Unfortunately, I am being not able to find answers to the following, too vague, questions: 1.- ...
user438991's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
244 views

Effectivity and Lower Shriek for Voevodsky Motives

I am in a situation where I need a result of the following form. Suppose $X$ is a smooth $k$-variety, $U$ is a dense open subvariety with complement $Z$ a smooth divisor. Let $\pi^X:X\rightarrow\text{...
user114292's user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
2k views

Spectral sequences in $K$-theory

There is an algebraic analogue of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence from singular cohomology to topological $K$-theory of a topological space. For a field $k$, let $X$ be smooth variety $X$ ...
user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
400 views

Hodge Realisation of Mixed Tate Motives

For a field $k$ which satisfies Beilinson-Soule vanishing conjecture, the from Levine's paper, https://www.uni-due.de/~bm0032/publ/TateMotives.pdf There exists an abelian category of mixed Tate ...
Wenzhe's user avatar
  • 2,971
5 votes
1 answer
324 views

Nori's Mixed Motives and Realisation Functors

The conjecture 51 in Levine's Mixed Motives in Handbook of K-theory http://www.math.illinois.edu/K-theory/handbook/1-429-522.pdf states that the functor induced by $hs:\text{ECM} \rightarrow \text{...
Wenzhe's user avatar
  • 2,971
4 votes
1 answer
182 views

Explicit description of Verdier quotient of effective motives

Let $DM^{eff}_{gm}(k)$ be the triangulated category of effective geometric motives over some field $k$ (in the sense of Voevodsky), and let $DM^{eff}_{gm}(k)(1)$ be its full triangulated subcategory ...
user111652's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
367 views

Dualizability and motivic cohomology

Suppose $k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$. Let $A=\mathbb{Z}/\ell\mathbb{Z}$, $\ell$ a prime coprime to $p$. Denote by $MA$ the motivic Eilenberg-Maclane spectrum over $k$. Is ...
user106838's user avatar
17 votes
1 answer
1k views

Why presheaves with transfer?

Presheaves with transfer are a main technical ingredient in Voevodsky's construction of his category of mixed motives. From the perspective of motivic homotopy theory, the only difference between SH ...
Fabian Carlström's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
726 views

What is missing in the current constructions of pure and mixed motives?

Yo! Maybe this question is too broad, so maybe it should be community wiki? In summary, I want to known all the known comparisons between all the constructions of pure and mixed motives and what make ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
7 votes
1 answer
919 views

Intuition behind the definition of finite correspondences

Finite correspondences were introduced by Suslin-Voevodsky (if I am not wrong) to define motivic complexes that compute motivic cohomology. Let $X$ and be smooth separated schemes of finite type over ...
Anandam Banerjee's user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
1k views

Motivic cohomology of a point

I was wondering how much is known about the integral motivic cohomology groups of $\mathrm{Spec}\, k$, $H^{n,p}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\mathrm{Spec}\, k,\mathbb{Z})$. One knows that $H^{n,n}_{\mathrm{mot}}(\...
Anandam Banerjee's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
917 views

Motivic cohomology and pushforward maps

I have a question about pushforward maps for the motivic cohomology groups $H^p(X, \mathbf{Q}(q))$, for $X$ a smooth variety over a characteristic 0 field. According to Mazza--Voevodsky--Weibel "...
David Loeffler's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
459 views

About embedding pure motives into the triangulated category of mixed motives and some further questions about motivic cohomology

I have tried reading some texts about motives, mainly motivic cohomology (Bloch's " Lectures on Algebraic Cycles", Voevodsky's "Motivic Cohomology" etc). However some things confused me. I don't know ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 2,227
0 votes
0 answers
288 views

What can one say about zero-cycle groups for products of Chow motives

What can one say about the Chow group of zero-cycles (up to rational equivalence) for a product of smooth projective varieties and Chow motives (so, I am interested in the kernel $Chow_0(P)\otimes ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
179 views

Which "concrete" morphisms of varieties and motives induce bijections of their lower Chow groups?

This question is a continuation of Varieties with Chow groups supported in positive codimension: examples and properties? What examples are known of morphisms of varieties and Chow motives (say, over ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
912 views

Standard conjectures on positive characteristic

In this MO answer of M. Bondarko, he says: "the Hodge conjecture implies all the Grothendieck's standard conjectures over base fields of characteristic 0..." and in Remarks on Grothendieck's ...
M. Carmona's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
218 views

The 'most general' papers on rational Borel-Moore motivic homology and K'-theory?

There are two ways to define Borel-Moore motivic homology (of schemes) with rational coefficients: one should either consider certain complexes of algebraic cycles, or the $\gamma$-filtrations of ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
176 views

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology and Universal cohomology theory? [duplicate]

Differences and relationships between Motivic cohomology (Beilinson, Lichtenbaum and Voevodsky) and Universal cohomology theory (Grothendieck)?
user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
467 views

Known norm varieties and the Bloch-Kato conjecture

The Bloch-Kato conjecture states that $K_M^n(k)/l \simeq H^n(k,\mu^{\otimes n}_l)$ for every $n,l$,while $l$ is invertible in $k$. A important part in the proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture is to ...
nxir's user avatar
  • 1,479
18 votes
4 answers
2k views

Applications of homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky

One of the most important theorems in motivic homotopy theory is the homotopy purity theorem of Morel-Voevodsky which says that the motivic Thom space of the normal bundle $\mathcal N_{Z/X}$ of a ...
Carl's user avatar
  • 805
5 votes
0 answers
801 views

Two questions on motivic homotopy theory

I am a beginner in motivic homotopy theory and motivic cohomology and have just begun reading books by Dundas et al. and Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel. I have two basic questions: Why is the question of $\...
Carl's user avatar
  • 805
6 votes
0 answers
351 views

Correspondences of schemes induced by a finite Galois extension

I am trying to do the first exercises of the Mazza-Voevodsky-Weibel book Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology, which are some elementary results about correspondences between schemes. Recall that if $...
Yohann Ségalat's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
266 views

Definition of Hurewicz map relating $SH(k)$ with $DM_\_^{eff}(k)$

In "Motivic Homotopy Theory" on page 153 it is stated that there exists a canonical Hurewicz map relating the motivic stable homotopy category with the category $\operatorname{DM}_\_^{eff}(k)$. ...
Felix Wellen's user avatar