Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
8 votes
1 answer
989 views

How to think about $\mathbf{Z}(n)_{\mathcal{M}}$

One definition of motivic cohomology for smooth schemes $X$ over a field, is via Friedlander-Suslin complexes. A refresher (you may skip to the question at the bottom) One defines (1) $z_n(X,d) :=$...
user avatar
42 votes
1 answer
6k views

Progress on the standard conjectures on algebraic cycles

What's the current state of these conjectures? Who is working on them? In "Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles" Grothendieck says: "They would form the basis of the so-called "theory of ...
user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
967 views

How to think about infinite generatedness of motivic cohomology

In this question I previously asked how to think about the motivic complex $\mathbf{Z}(1)_{\mathcal{M}}$, whose Zariski hypercohomology should morally be the "singular cohomology" $H^*((-)\wedge S^{2n}...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
261 views

Codimension restrictions on intersections

This is a question I stumbled across earlier this week. I see a similar one has been asked here. Suppose I have a smooth quasi projective variety $X$ over a field $K$, and I call $\text{Chow}^r(X\...
user avatar