All Questions
Tagged with lattices set-theory
6 questions
3
votes
1
answer
132
views
Is the interval topology on ${\cal P}(\omega)/(\text{fin})$ connected?
If $(P,\leq)$ is a poset and $x\in X$, we let $\downarrow x = \{p\in P: p \leq x\}$, and $\uparrow x$ is defined dually. The collection $$\Big\{P\setminus (\downarrow x): x\in P\Big\} \cup \Big\{P\...
7
votes
1
answer
328
views
The Tarski-Lindenbaum theorem of the middle value
In Ettore Casari, La Matematica della Verita' (2006), the following theorem (attributed to Tarski and Lindenbaum 1926), is stated, which Casari calls the theorem of the middle value of Tarski-...
6
votes
0
answers
554
views
Is this property a new large cardinal notion?
Given a cardinal $\kappa$, $\kappa$-complete lattices are lattices that have joins and meets of less than $\kappa$ elements (in particular they are bounded). In what follows we shall restrict to the ...
1
vote
0
answers
236
views
Dedekind–MacNeille completion of ordered abelian monoids
It's known that the Dedekind–Macneille completion of an ordered Abelian group necessarily is not an ordered Abelian group (and it is an ordered Abelian monoid). I want to know that what happened ...
1
vote
0
answers
408
views
existence of order preserving map [closed]
suppose A is a linear order set with a copy of rationals in it that is $A=B\cup\{\bar{r}:r\in\mathbb{Q}\cap[0,1]\}$. is there an orde preserving map that preservs sup and inf betwwen A and $[0,1]$ in ...
5
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Can the Knaster-Tarski theorem be proved using the Schroeder-Bernstein theorem?
The reverse can be done easily and the proof is well known I am wondering if the exact same argument can be used to prove reverse as well.