Skip to main content

Questions tagged [foundations]

Mathematical logic, Set theory, Peano arithmetic, Model theory, Proof theory, Recursion theory, Computability theory, Univalent foundations, Reverse mathematics, Frege foundation of arithmetic, Goedel's incompleteness and Mathematics, Structural set theory, Category theory, Type theory.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
73 views

How strong is separation + reflection without transitivity?

Consider a theory $T$ with a binary relation $\in$ and the following axiom schemas: $\exists u \forall x (x \in u \leftrightarrow x \in a \land \phi)$ where $u$ is not free in $\phi$. This is the ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
14 votes
0 answers
386 views

Can the axiom of choice be expressed in 4 quantifiers?

This 2007 paper presents a 5-quantifier $(\in, =)$-expression that is ZF-equivalent to the axiom of choice, but leaves open the 4-quantifier case: Thus the gap is reduced to the undecided case of a 4 ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
12 votes
1 answer
225 views

Is there a $\Pi_2$ sentence $A$ such that $\text{ZFC}^- + A$ proves powerset?

This is a follow-up to this question. Let $\text{ZFC}^-$ be ZFC without powerset and with collection rather than replacement, as described here. Is there a $\Pi_2$ (or perhaps $\Sigma_2$) sentence $A$ ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
6 votes
2 answers
319 views

Set theoretical foundations for derived categories

A modern approach to derived functors, that has been shown to be useful in a number of different circunstances is that of a derived category (see the book by Yakutieli, for example, here). However, it ...
jg1896's user avatar
  • 3,318
16 votes
2 answers
1k views

CH in non-set theoretic foundations

I asked this question on stack exchange and got little attention, barring a nice example I intend to look into. The original post can be found here: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4941233/1053681 I ...
Joseph_Kopp's user avatar
13 votes
1 answer
932 views

Consistency strength of HoTT

What is the consistency strength of Homotopy type theory (HoTT) relative to various set theories (e.g., are there any known set theories that it can interpret)? Does this question even make sense?
Jesse Elliott's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
157 views

How to define Dedekind reals and Eudoxus reals such that they are equivalent to unmodulated Cauchy reals

In constructive mathematics without choice, we have three different versions of the real numbers (each embedding into the next). Regular Cauchy reals (functions $f : \mathbb N \to \mathbb Q$ such ...
Christopher King's user avatar
24 votes
2 answers
2k views

Foundations and contradictions of Scholze's work: the category of presentable infinity categories contains itself

Preface: I am not an expert in the work of Scholze, or anything for that matter. Question Has Scholze stated what axioms he is using to develop his theory of motives and analytic geometry. In the ...
Rilem's user avatar
  • 383
3 votes
1 answer
256 views

Can these short set-building expressions of the finite set world extend to the infinite set world?

A formula of the form $\forall \vec{p}\, \exists x \, \forall y\, (y \in x \leftrightarrow \phi(y,\vec{p}))$ is to be named a "set-building" formula. Now, when $\vec{p}$ includes a predicate ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
1k views

Type vs. Set Theory: Expressive Ability

In the modern mathematical arena, the two primary contenders for the ‘correct’ foundation of mathematics are set and type theory. Set theory, very roughly, captures the intuition that we frequently ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.1k
9 votes
2 answers
380 views

How big can function spaces get without extensionality?

In what follows we work in the usual formulation of Martin-Löf Type Theory including Axiom K [1]. Boldface numbers $\mathbf{n}$ denote the usual finite type with $n$ elements. Motivation Postulating ...
Z. A. K.'s user avatar
  • 756
5 votes
3 answers
664 views

Negating fundamental axioms

It is commonplace to consider standard axiomatic systems (e.g. $ZF$) with one of the 'less essential' axioms negated, like infinity, 'less essential' here having some ambiguous definition related to ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.1k
9 votes
2 answers
473 views

Completing half of Hilbert's program: Foundations that are conservative over Peano Arithmetic

The goal of the Hilbert program was to find a complete and consistent formalization of mathematics. Gödel's first incompleteness theorem establishes that completeness is impossible with first-order ...
Christopher King's user avatar
29 votes
3 answers
3k views

Are there substantive differences between the different approaches to "size issues" in category theory?

In category theory, there are different ways to approach the "size issues" that crop up when we try to formalise the subject in axiomatic set theory. As far as I can tell, there are two main ...
Joe Lamond's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
177 views

Recording of 2009 lecture on Harvey Friedman's work

On December 13--20 2009 at Bristol, there was a meeting devoted to thorough dissection of Harvey Friedman's work on the foundations of mathematics and his statements claimed to be equivalent to ...
C7X's user avatar
  • 2,031
2 votes
0 answers
220 views

Which is richer Set or Graph Theory?

This theory about structures, defined as abstractions over isomorphic graphs, can interpret Set Theory in a rather creepy manner. Though the theory is largely technical, yet it is not far from being ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
164 views

Suitability of formal type theory for mathematical thinking (vs. traditional set theory)

Type theory has advantages over set theory for the (computer) formalisation of mathematics, but has anybody who does mathematics with pen and paper found proof assistants or automated theorem provers, ...
Troubled Shallows's user avatar
11 votes
3 answers
2k views

What governs our "perception?" about the platonic realm of sets?

Here, I want to delve into what do we exactly feel about what constitutes a platonic existence of a set? Or what makes us think or actually a kind of feel or sense the existence of a set in the ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
596 views

The "first-order theory of the second-order theory of $\mathrm{ZFC}$"

$\newcommand\ZFC{\mathrm{ZFC}}\DeclareMathOperator\Con{Con}$It is often interesting to look at the theory of all first-order statements that are true in some second-order theory, giving us things like ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
600 views

Why not $\sf ZFC+[V=HOD]$?

Why not $\sf ZFC+[V=HOD]$ as the standard set theory? It implies the existence of a definable global choice and well-order, and it is compatible with all large cardinal axioms extending $\sf ZFC$, so ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
200 views

Does inductive definitions must be supported by the set theoretical definition of natural numbers?

In page 4 of Gödel's book The Consistency Of The Axiom Of Choice and Of The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis With The Axioms Of Set Theory, Gödel defined the $n$-tuple as $\langle x \rangle = x$; $\...
Wenchuan Zhao's user avatar
-4 votes
1 answer
198 views

Is Bounding Reflection consistent?

Working in the first order language of set theory. Let $\varphi^{*B}$ be the formula obtained from $\varphi$ by merely bounding all open quantifiers in $\varphi$ by the symbol "$B$". Here a ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
344 views

What is the proof of consistency of anterior reflection?

Let Anterior Reflection be the following principle: $$\forall \vec{v}~ \exists X: \operatorname {transitive} (X) \land \, (\varphi \to \varphi^{X"}) $$ where $\varphi$ is a formula in $\sf FOL(=,\in)$ ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
296 views

Can this form of reflection be consistent?

Is this form of reflection consistent? First I'll begin by clarifying the notation I'm using here: By a quantifier being relativized or bounded it means that the first occurrence of the quantified ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
96 views

Is this form of replacement suitable for ZF - Powerset + well-ordering principle?

The following scheme can be understood as a form of replacement. Axiomatizing $\sf ZF$ with it instead of the usual replacement schema renders it immune to removal of extensionality; see here. In an ...
Zuhair Al-Johar's user avatar
18 votes
3 answers
3k views

What's the earliest result (outside of logic) that cannot be proven constructively?

Although mathematicians usually do not work in constructive mathematics per se, their results often are constructively valid (even if the original proof isn't). An obvious counter-example is the law ...
Christopher King's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
317 views

Is univalence equivalent to every type function being a functor over equivalence?

Introduce a rule in type theory that if $\Gamma \vdash f : \text{Type} \to \text{Type}$ and $\Gamma \vdash e : A \simeq B$ then $\Gamma \vdash f[e] : f(A) \simeq f(B)$. It may seem like such a rule is ...
Christopher King's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
209 views

Are there times when replacement is "more natural" than collection?

There are a couple examples I'm aware of where choosing to axiomatize $\mathsf{ZF(C)}$ using collection instead of replacement results in a much nicer (or at least less surprising) picture: Let $\...
Noah Schweber's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
368 views

Bounded alternatives to powerset that interpret ZFC

In set theory, many properties/relations of interest can be expressed as $\Delta_0$ formulas (formulas with only bounded quantifiers): \begin{align} \text{empty}(a) &\equiv \forall x \in a . \...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
7 votes
3 answers
459 views

How much Dependent Choice is provable in $Z_2$? And what about Projective Determinacy?

So, second order arithmetic, $Z_2$, is capable of proving quite a few things. One thing which would be of use is dependent choice for $\mathbb{R}$. Basically, dependent choice on $\mathbb{R}$ says ...
Alex Appel's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

Existence of skeletons in ZFC

Influenced by this question from a fellow lagomorph, I would like to get to the bottom of existence of a skeleton of a category. I want to stay in ZFC, so I do not assume the global axiom of choice. ...
Bugs Bunny's user avatar
  • 12.3k
3 votes
1 answer
346 views

Second order theory of a real-closed field

It is well known that the first-order theory of any real-closed field is complete, and consequently not capable of interpreting the majority of modern mathematics. Is this still true for the second-...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.1k
43 votes
4 answers
5k views

Lists as a foundation of mathematics

I am wondering if there is a foundation of mathematics where not sets or "set-like objects" (such as objects of a suitable topos as in ETCS) are the primitive notion, but rather lists. These ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
190 views

Is Vopěnka's principle inherited by Grothendieck topoi?

I call the Vopěnka's principle: Every subfunctor of an accessible functor is accessible but other formulations (which may lose equivalence in weak contexts?) are also interesting to me. If this is ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
315 views

In HoTT with LEM, are sets and pointed sets the same thing?

The operations of adding and removing a point (where removing is a consideration of a subset of elements x such that $(x = *) \to 0$) implements the equivalence of these 1-types, as far as I can see. ...
Arshak Aivazian's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
269 views

How did Szmielew prove that Pasch's axiom is a consequence of the circle axiom?

It is alleged that Szmielew proved that Pasch's axiom is a consequence of the circle axiom. The source is said to be The Pasch axiom as a consequence of the circle axiom, Bull.Acad.Polon.Sci.Sér.Sci....
parallelogram's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

Propositional calculus, first order theories, models, completeness

In the usual context of model theory one studies first order theories: the Gödel completeness theorem asserts that $\varphi$ is a theorem of a theory $T$ (i.e. $\varphi$ is provable from the axioms of ...
truebaran's user avatar
  • 9,330
22 votes
4 answers
4k views

How much of the axiom of choice do you need in mathematics?

Say we have DC-λ where λ is some inaccessible cardinal. Is that enough to develop all of ordinary mathematics? If not, is there a strengthening that is but that nevertheless does not assume full ...
Someone211's user avatar
12 votes
3 answers
2k views

Real reverse mathematics

Standard mathematical developments, be they set theoretic, type theoretic, synthetic, etc. all follow the same basic pattern: Lay out a language, assume some stuff in this language, then prove that ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 10.1k
1 vote
0 answers
100 views

What computable pseudo-ordinals are there with initial segment $\omega_1^{CK}(1+\eta+1)$?

The notion of a “computable pseudo-ordinal”, i.e. a computable linear order with no hyperarithmetical descending chains, is an old one going back to Stephen Kleene. Joe Harrison wrote the definitive ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
133 views

Higher-order oracle computation of reals and axiom of constructibility

Certain real numbers can be approximated arbitrarily well by computable functions. If we introduce halting oracles, then more real numbers can be "computed", like Chaitin's constant or the ...
GChromodynamics's user avatar
8 votes
0 answers
156 views

How strong is exponentiation with only open induction? (Or: "how low can we go?")

Do the strongest theories currently known to be unconstrained by Tennenbaum's theorem ($IOpen$ and some modest extensions) remain so when augmented with a definition of exponentiation and axiom $\...
Robin Saunders's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
281 views

What is the meaning and proof of Harvey Friedman’s ultrafinite incompleteness sentence?

On page 7 of his paper “Adventures in Incompleteness”, Harvey Friedman states the following: IN ANY LONG ENOUGH SEQUENCE $x_1,...,x_n$ FROM $\{1,2,3\}$, SOME $(x_i,...,x_{2i})$ IS A SUBSEQUENCE OF ...
Keshav Srinivasan's user avatar
12 votes
0 answers
269 views

Freiling's question

(I've asked this question at Math StackExchange here but haven't gotten any response, so I decided to take a shot here as well.) In his paper "Axioms of Symmetry: Throwing Darts at the Real ...
Y.Z.'s user avatar
  • 231
2 votes
1 answer
69 views

Infinite decreasing sequence for class relation without minimal elements

Let us assume $<$ is some class relation without minimal elements, meaning $\forall a, \exists b, b< a$. This means that for every $n\in\omega$, one can build a decreasing function $f$ with ...
ViHdzP's user avatar
  • 447
23 votes
2 answers
1k views

Statements in differential geometry independent from ZFC

It is well known that some problems in functional analysis and in general topology are independent from ZFC: to name a few, Kaplansky's conjecture, the existence of outer automorphisms of the Calkin ...
3 votes
2 answers
331 views

On the definition of small categories in SGA4

We assume ZFC+U. A category is an ordered pair $(\operatorname{Ob} \mathcal{C},\operatorname{Mor} \mathcal{C},\operatorname{dom},\operatorname{codom},e,∘)$ of sets (not classes) and maps satifying ...
LOCOAS's user avatar
  • 405
3 votes
1 answer
510 views

Harvey Friedman: The expanding mind

In reference 1, Friedman writes: I discuss my efforts concerning 3 crucial issues in the foundations of mathematics that are deeply connected with the great work of Kurt Gödel. [...] B. Are there ...
user76284's user avatar
  • 2,203
6 votes
0 answers
153 views

Does every Tarski plane embed into a 3-dimensional Tarski space?

By a Tarski space I understand a mathematical structure $(X,B,\equiv)$ consisting of set $X$, a betweenness relation $B\subseteq X^3$ and a congruence relation ${\equiv}\subseteq X^2\times X^2$ ...
Taras Banakh's user avatar
  • 41.8k
6 votes
1 answer
892 views

Can the axiom of choice be proved with ZF+Tarski axiom?

Can choice be proved with ZF+Tarski axiom?
Carlos Freites's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
7