All Questions
6 questions
1
vote
0
answers
522
views
Is this a good way of conceptualising the current status of Foundation of Maths projects?
I have been reading 'A Very Short Introduction to Mathematics' by Timothy Gowers and at one point he mentions that most of the mathematical proofs can be finally resolved to a set of logical ...
60
votes
7
answers
9k
views
In what respect are univalent foundations "better" than set theory?
It was an ambitious project of Vladimir Voevodsky's to provide new foundations for mathematics with univalent foundations (UF) to eventually replace set theory (ST).
Part of what makes ST so appealing ...
1
vote
1
answer
484
views
"Co-ordinate-free" mathematics for general structures? [closed]
Edit (15 November 2017): I've just stumbled across this question, which I think is asking essentially the same thing I tried to ask below, but probably worded it more clearly - and got far more ...
0
votes
1
answer
678
views
Why do we try to encode every mathematical object as a set? [closed]
Probably everyone of us has seen set-theoretic encodings of mathematical objects which we wouldn't naturally consider to be sets. May it be the "definition" of a function from $A$ to $B$ as a relation ...
50
votes
4
answers
6k
views
Do set-theorists use informal set theory as their meta-theory when talking about models of ZFC?
Here, Noah Schweber writes the following:
Most mathematics is not done in ZFC. Most mathematics, in fact, isn't done axiomatically at all: rather, we simply use propositions which seem "intuitively ...
28
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Age of Stochasticity?
One user on MSE made an interesting question, which was unanswered so I suggested him to post it here but he refused for personal reasons and said I could ask it here.
The question is this:
Today ...