All Questions
Tagged with foundations set-theory
156 questions
1
vote
0
answers
73
views
How strong is separation + reflection without transitivity?
Consider a theory $T$ with a binary relation $\in$ and the following axiom schemas:
$\exists u \forall x (x \in u \leftrightarrow x \in a \land \phi)$ where $u$ is not free in $\phi$. This is the ...
- 2,203
14
votes
0
answers
386
views
Can the axiom of choice be expressed in 4 quantifiers?
This 2007 paper presents a 5-quantifier $(\in, =)$-expression that is ZF-equivalent to the axiom of choice, but leaves open the 4-quantifier case:
Thus the gap is reduced to the undecided case of a 4 ...
- 2,203
12
votes
1
answer
225
views
Is there a $\Pi_2$ sentence $A$ such that $\text{ZFC}^- + A$ proves powerset?
This is a follow-up to this question.
Let $\text{ZFC}^-$ be ZFC without powerset and with collection rather than replacement, as described here.
Is there a $\Pi_2$ (or perhaps $\Sigma_2$) sentence $A$ ...
- 2,203
16
votes
2
answers
1k
views
CH in non-set theoretic foundations
I asked this question on stack exchange and got little attention, barring a nice example I intend to look into. The original post can be found here: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4941233/1053681
I ...
- 261
13
votes
1
answer
932
views
Consistency strength of HoTT
What is the consistency strength of Homotopy type theory (HoTT) relative to various set theories (e.g., are there any known set theories that it can interpret)? Does this question even make sense?
- 4,985
3
votes
1
answer
256
views
Can these short set-building expressions of the finite set world extend to the infinite set world?
A formula of the form $\forall \vec{p}\, \exists x \, \forall y\, (y \in x \leftrightarrow \phi(y,\vec{p}))$
is to be named a "set-building" formula.
Now, when $\vec{p}$ includes a predicate ...
- 11.3k
14
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Type vs. Set Theory: Expressive Ability
In the modern mathematical arena, the two primary contenders for the ‘correct’ foundation of mathematics are set and type theory.
Set theory, very roughly, captures the intuition that we frequently ...
- 10.1k
29
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Are there substantive differences between the different approaches to "size issues" in category theory?
In category theory, there are different ways to approach the "size issues" that crop up when we try to formalise the subject in axiomatic set theory. As far as I can tell, there are two main ...
- 961
2
votes
0
answers
220
views
Which is richer Set or Graph Theory?
This theory about structures, defined as abstractions over isomorphic graphs, can interpret Set Theory in a rather creepy manner. Though the theory is largely technical, yet it is not far from being ...
- 11.3k
3
votes
0
answers
164
views
Suitability of formal type theory for mathematical thinking (vs. traditional set theory)
Type theory has advantages over set theory for the (computer) formalisation of mathematics, but has anybody who does mathematics with pen and paper found proof assistants or automated theorem provers, ...
11
votes
3
answers
2k
views
What governs our "perception?" about the platonic realm of sets?
Here, I want to delve into what do we exactly feel about what constitutes a platonic existence of a set? Or what makes us think or actually a kind of feel or sense the existence of a set in the ...
- 11.3k
5
votes
1
answer
596
views
The "first-order theory of the second-order theory of $\mathrm{ZFC}$"
$\newcommand\ZFC{\mathrm{ZFC}}\DeclareMathOperator\Con{Con}$It is often interesting to look at the theory of all first-order statements that are true in some second-order theory, giving us things like ...
- 4,897
2
votes
1
answer
200
views
Does inductive definitions must be supported by the set theoretical definition of natural numbers?
In page 4 of Gödel's book The Consistency Of The Axiom Of Choice and Of The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis With The Axioms Of Set Theory, Gödel defined the $n$-tuple as
$\langle x \rangle = x$;
$\...
- 115
-4
votes
1
answer
198
views
Is Bounding Reflection consistent?
Working in the first order language of set theory.
Let $\varphi^{*B}$ be the formula obtained from $\varphi$ by merely bounding all open quantifiers in $\varphi$ by the symbol "$B$".
Here a ...
- 11.3k
5
votes
1
answer
344
views
What is the proof of consistency of anterior reflection?
Let Anterior Reflection be the following principle: $$\forall \vec{v}~ \exists X: \operatorname {transitive} (X) \land \, (\varphi \to \varphi^{X"}) $$
where $\varphi$ is a formula in $\sf FOL(=,\in)$ ...
- 11.3k
-3
votes
1
answer
296
views
Can this form of reflection be consistent?
Is this form of reflection consistent?
First I'll begin by clarifying the notation I'm using here:
By a quantifier being relativized or bounded it means that the first occurrence of the quantified ...
- 11.3k
3
votes
1
answer
96
views
Is this form of replacement suitable for ZF - Powerset + well-ordering principle?
The following scheme can be understood as a form of replacement. Axiomatizing $\sf ZF$ with it instead of the usual replacement schema renders it immune to removal of extensionality; see here.
In an ...
- 11.3k
12
votes
0
answers
209
views
Are there times when replacement is "more natural" than collection?
There are a couple examples I'm aware of where choosing to axiomatize $\mathsf{ZF(C)}$ using collection instead of replacement results in a much nicer (or at least less surprising) picture:
Let $\...
- 21.1k
4
votes
1
answer
368
views
Bounded alternatives to powerset that interpret ZFC
In set theory, many properties/relations of interest can be expressed as $\Delta_0$ formulas (formulas with only bounded quantifiers):
\begin{align}
\text{empty}(a) &\equiv \forall x \in a . \...
- 2,203
7
votes
3
answers
459
views
How much Dependent Choice is provable in $Z_2$? And what about Projective Determinacy?
So, second order arithmetic, $Z_2$, is capable of proving quite a few things. One thing which would be of use is dependent choice for $\mathbb{R}$.
Basically, dependent choice on $\mathbb{R}$ says ...
- 353
11
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Existence of skeletons in ZFC
Influenced by this question from a fellow lagomorph, I would like to get to the bottom of existence of a skeleton of a category. I want to stay in ZFC, so I do not assume the global axiom of choice. ...
- 12.3k
43
votes
4
answers
5k
views
Lists as a foundation of mathematics
I am wondering if there is a foundation of mathematics where not sets or "set-like objects" (such as objects of a suitable topos as in ETCS) are the primitive notion, but rather lists. These ...
- 63.1k
6
votes
0
answers
190
views
Is Vopěnka's principle inherited by Grothendieck topoi?
I call the Vopěnka's principle:
Every subfunctor of an accessible functor is accessible
but other formulations (which may lose equivalence in weak contexts?) are also interesting to me.
If this is ...
- 6,962
22
votes
4
answers
4k
views
How much of the axiom of choice do you need in mathematics?
Say we have DC-λ where λ is some inaccessible cardinal. Is that enough to develop all of ordinary mathematics? If not, is there a strengthening that is but that nevertheless does not assume full ...
- 419
2
votes
0
answers
133
views
Higher-order oracle computation of reals and axiom of constructibility
Certain real numbers can be approximated arbitrarily well by computable functions. If we introduce halting oracles, then more real numbers can be "computed", like Chaitin's constant or the ...
- 173
12
votes
0
answers
269
views
Freiling's question
(I've asked this question at Math StackExchange here but haven't gotten any response, so I decided to take a shot here as well.)
In his paper "Axioms of Symmetry: Throwing Darts at the Real ...
- 231
2
votes
1
answer
69
views
Infinite decreasing sequence for class relation without minimal elements
Let us assume $<$ is some class relation without minimal elements, meaning $\forall a, \exists b, b< a$. This means that for every $n\in\omega$, one can build a decreasing function $f$ with ...
- 447
23
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Statements in differential geometry independent from ZFC
It is well known that some problems in functional analysis and in general topology are independent from ZFC: to name a few, Kaplansky's conjecture, the existence of outer automorphisms of the Calkin ...
3
votes
2
answers
331
views
On the definition of small categories in SGA4
We assume ZFC+U.
A category is an ordered pair $(\operatorname{Ob} \mathcal{C},\operatorname{Mor} \mathcal{C},\operatorname{dom},\operatorname{codom},e,∘)$ of sets (not classes) and maps satifying ...
- 405
3
votes
1
answer
510
views
Harvey Friedman: The expanding mind
In reference 1, Friedman writes:
I discuss my efforts concerning 3 crucial issues in the foundations of mathematics that are deeply connected with the great work of Kurt Gödel.
[...]
B. Are there ...
- 2,203
6
votes
1
answer
892
views
Can the axiom of choice be proved with ZF+Tarski axiom?
Can choice be proved with ZF+Tarski axiom?
- 201
16
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Why do we care about small sets?
I have been a user of category theory for a long time. I recently started studying a rigorous treatment of categories within ZFC+U. Then I become suspecting the effect of the smallness of sets.
We ...
- 405
6
votes
1
answer
204
views
How strong is separation + reflection of unbounded quantifiers?
Consider a set theory with the following axioms:
separation: $\exists y \forall x (x \in y \leftrightarrow \phi \land x \in a)$ where $y$ is not free in $\phi$
reflection: $\phi \to \exists u \phi^u$
...
- 2,203
-6
votes
1
answer
402
views
Is ZFC set theory a satisfactory foundation for mathematics?
The conventional wisdom seems to be that it is, but there are problematic mismatches. Some are well-known: the use of first-order logic, and the many different implementations of the axioms, neither ...
- 271
1
vote
0
answers
57
views
What is the consistency strength of this addition on simple type-set theory?
Language: multi-sorted first order logic with equality and membership, where for each natural $n$ there is a set $x^n$ of sort $n$. Equality "$=$" only occurs between variables of the same ...
- 11.3k
1
vote
0
answers
123
views
Is $\sf \Gamma_0$ the proof theoretic ordinal of this kind of predicative class theory?
Adopting the approach of Mono-sorted $\sf NBG$, define sets as elements of classes, then axiomatize:
Extensionality, Predicative Class comprehension, emptyset, in the usual manner along mono-sorted $\...
- 11.3k
1
vote
0
answers
127
views
What is the proof theoretic ordinal of this kind of predicative type-set theory?
The following is a kind of Predicative Type Set Theory.
The question is about what is exactly the proof theoretic ordinal of this theory? Is it lower than the one expected for predicative theories, i....
- 11.3k
1
vote
0
answers
117
views
Can this type theory interpret second order arithmetic?
Language: multi-sorted first order logic with equality and membership, where for each natural $t$ there is a set $x^t$ of sort $t$. Equality "$=$" only occurs between variables of the same ...
- 11.3k
1
vote
0
answers
94
views
Is definability in $V$ in $\sf Ack+MK$ expressible in its language?
Recall Ackermann set theory. If we extend Ackermann's set theory by adding all axioms of $\sf MK$ to it. We shall denote the universe of all elements by $W$, while $V$ is the primitive constant symbol ...
- 11.3k
7
votes
2
answers
588
views
Consistency strength of an attempt at higher order set theory
Work in a theory with (deep breath) a countable number of primitives denoted with capital letters from the end of the alphabet with numerical subscripts $\{X_n,Y_n,Z_n,\dots\}_{n<\omega}$ ...
- 10.1k
1
vote
0
answers
204
views
Can Frege set extensions of second order unary predicates serve as a foundation for mathematics?
To second order logic, add a primitive partial one place function symbol "$\epsilon$" from unary predicate symbols [upper cases] to object symbols [lower cases].
Define: $ x=y \equiv_{df} \...
- 11.3k
6
votes
1
answer
1k
views
An axiomatic approach to the multiverse of sets
Work in a theory where the primitives are classes $X,Y,Z,\dots$, and class membership $X\in Y$, and add an individual constant $\mathcal{M}$ called 'the multiverse'. Classes $V$ which are members of ...
- 10.1k
0
votes
0
answers
78
views
'Maximising interpretative power entails maximising consistency strength'?
I'm hoping there is a clear mathematical answer to this question (hence asking it here) rather than anything more exegetical (in which case it's presumably not appropriate for this site).
In his paper ...
- 161
17
votes
0
answers
509
views
The free complete lattice on three generators, beyond ZF
This was originally asked at MSE; although it is still under bounty it seems unlikely to be answered there.
$\mathsf{ZF}$ proves that there is no free complete lattice on three generators since any ...
- 21.1k
12
votes
0
answers
573
views
Harvey Friedman's minimalist axioms for set theory
[This is a question on the FOM mailing list.]
In 1997, Harvey Friedman introduced the following theory: Let $\in$ be a binary predicate and $U$ be a constant. Add the following axioms:
Subworld ...
- 2,203
1
vote
0
answers
192
views
Does foundationless Ackermann set theory prove replacement?
From Ackermann's set theory equals ZF (1970) by William N. Reinhardt:
Let A be the theory determined by the following axioms:
Extensionality: $\forall z (z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y$
...
- 2,203
3
votes
0
answers
184
views
Can we interpret ZFC in GEM?
I have long held similar views as put forth here. As professor Hamkins points out though, $(M,\subseteq)$ is insufficient to model most of mathematics. However, this is unsatisfactory to me, as this ...
- 433
6
votes
1
answer
444
views
What do you call the generalisation of the direct image?
This question was posted on Math Stack Exchange, but did not attract an answer. Here is the question:
Informal Description
Let me start with an example. Let $X$ be the set $\{a, b, c, d, e\}$ and $E$ ...
- 115
5
votes
2
answers
629
views
Applications of ZFA-Set Theory
The set theory with atoms (ZFA), is a modified version of set theory, and is characterized by the fact that it admits objects other than sets, atoms. Atoms are objects which do not have any elements.
...
- 115
6
votes
2
answers
376
views
Resource request on "$\in$-homomorphisms" in Set Theory
Very loosely put, this is the intuitive idea behind an $\in$-homomorphism:
Let $\mathcal{U}$ and $\mathcal{W}$ be universes of sets. A function $f \colon \mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{W}$ is said to be an $...
- 61