Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
7 votes
1 answer
322 views

Why is Nagao's theorem the "Module theoretic version of Brauer's second main theorem"?

Let $G$ be a finite group, $p\in\mathbb{P}$ a prime, $\mathbb{F}$ an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p$, and $D\leq G$ a $p$-subgroup. Brauer second main theorem states If $\chi\in ...
Johannes Hahn's user avatar