Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
-1 votes
0 answers
64 views

Axes of symmetry and symmetry group of the tangent cone to an open, connected, convex subset of the Euclidean space

Given a closed convex set $K\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ and a point $x\in K$ the tangent cone to $K$ at $x$ is defined by \begin{equation} T_xK:=\overline{\{v\in \mathbb{R}^d: \exists \lambda \geq 0 \text{ ...
Learning math's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
112 views

Explicit Lagrangian fibrations of a K3 surface

I would like to look at the behaviour of the fibres of a Lagrangian fibration (such that at least some fibres are not special Lagrangian) $X\to\mathbb{CP}^1$ under the mean curvature flow (in relation ...
Quaere Verum's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
63 views

Coordinate free supersymmetric sigma model Lagrangian

I would like to know if there is a coordinate free version of the Lagrangian of the supersymmetric sigma model on a $2$-dimensional spacetime, with target space a Kähler manifold. The action for this ...
Quaere Verum's user avatar
11 votes
0 answers
450 views

K-stability is invariant under D-equivalency

Kawamata conjectured that Let $X$ and $Y$ be birationally equivalent smooth projective varieties. Then the following are equivalent. We denote by $D^b(Coh(X))$ the derived category of bounded ...
user avatar
23 votes
3 answers
2k views

How mirror of quintic was originally found?

In the 90-91 pager "A PAIR OF CALABI-YAU MANIFOLDS AS AN EXACTLY SOLUBLE SUPERCONFORMAL THEORY", Candelas, de la Ossa, Green, and Parkes, brought up a family of Calabi-Yau 3-folds, canonically ...
Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
460 views

A question on the topological change of dualizing a SLAG fibration.

Let $S$ be a K3 surface and $\pi:S\rightarrow B$ be a SLAG $T^2$-fibration. I am struggling with a statement that Fiberwise dualization does not change the topology of $S$. Here by fiberwise ...
Tobias's user avatar
  • 41
4 votes
2 answers
2k views

complexified kahler form

In mirror symmetry one usually considers a complexified kahler form $B+iw$ instead of kahler form $w$ itself.(Or their moduli) Here is the question: What does $B$ correspond to? what kind of ...
Mohammad Farajzadeh-Tehrani's user avatar