Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
1 answer
376 views

Relation between trivial tangent bundle $\Leftrightarrow$ certain characteristic classes of tangent bundle vanish [closed]

We know that framing structure means the trivialization of tangent bundle of manifold $M$. string structure means the trivialization of Stiefel-Whitney class $w_1$, $w_2$ and half of the first ...
zeta's user avatar
  • 447
1 vote
1 answer
192 views

Lie group framing and framed bordism

What is the definition of Lie group framing, in simple terms? Is the Lie group framing of spheres a particular type of Lie group framing? (How special is the Lie group framing of spheres differed ...
zeta's user avatar
  • 447
2 votes
1 answer
165 views

string bordism group and framed bordism group for $d \leq 6$ and $d \geq 7$

Why do the string bordism group and the framed bordism group coincide the same in dimensions lower than 7 ($d = 0,1,2,3,4,5, 6$)? Why do the string bordism group and the framed bordism group differ ...
wonderich's user avatar
  • 10.5k
1 vote
0 answers
185 views

Proving a Result About Pontryagin Numbers Without Forms

I've been reading the book Geometry of Differential Forms by Shigeyuki Morita, and I came across the following theorem on page 226 the other day: Proposition 5.53 (Pontryagin). Two cobordant closed (...
Nicholas James's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
260 views

Bordism for oriented triangulable manifolds without smooth differentiable structures

We know the bordism group for oriented smooth differentiable structures such as $\Omega_d^{SO}$ that requires the special orthogonal group structure on the tangent bundle $TM$ of manifold $M$. $$\...
wonderich's user avatar
  • 10.5k
3 votes
0 answers
194 views

The first Stiefel Whitney class v.s. fermion eta invariant v.s. spin structure v.s. $H^1(M,\mathbb{Z}_2)$

$H^1(M,\mathbb{Z}_2)$ specifies the 1st cohomology class of manifold $M$ (can be regarded as spacetime) with $\mathbb{Z}_2$ coefficient, it is often to see that we say the 1st Stiefel Whitney class $$...
annie marie cœur's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
784 views

Cobordism invariants: topological v.s. geometric

Some cobordism invariants are not cohomology classes. Such as the $\mathbb{Z}_{16}$-valued eta invariant $\eta$ of $\Omega_4^{Pin^+}$, the $\mathbb{Z}_8$-valued Arf-Brown-Kervaire invariant ABK of $\...
Borromean's user avatar
  • 1,329
20 votes
1 answer
683 views

Super-cobordisms

One can construct the $d$-dimensional bordism category by declaring the objects to be the $(d-1)$-dimensional compact manifolds without boundary and the morphisms the $d$-dimensional bordisms between ...
Nerses Aramian's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
550 views

(Infinite) Suspension Functor on the Pontryagin-Thom Construction

This is a slightly revamped version of a question I asked on the stackexchange forum. That question was asking if the Pontryagin-Thom constructon respects the suspension operation, alluding to stable ...
Chris Gerig's user avatar
  • 17.5k
11 votes
1 answer
1k views

Reference request for TQFT, functoriality

I am reading Turaev's blue book Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-manifolds. It is difficult for me to understand the proof of Theorem 1.9 in chapter 4, which says; The function $(M, \partial_{-}M, \...
Link's user avatar
  • 111