All Questions
7 questions
33
votes
15
answers
7k
views
What's a magical theorem in logic?
Some theorems are magical: their hypotheses are easy to meet, and when invoked (as lemmas) in the midst of an otherwise routine proof, they deliver the desired conclusion more or less straightaway&...
9
votes
0
answers
471
views
(A little bit) Beyond the E-recursive
The E-recursive functions are a particular generalization of classical recursion theory to the entire set-theoretic universe, $V$. They are defined via a schemes: see Sacks' $E$-recursive intuitions. ...
2
votes
1
answer
176
views
How can Kőnig's Lemma be expressed in Monadic Second-Order Logic of 2 Successors?
I read the following on Wikipedia's page on Monadic Second-Order Logic of Two Successors (MS2S):
Weak S2S (WS2S) requires all sets to be finite (note that finiteness
is expressible in S2S using Kőnig'...
2
votes
1
answer
154
views
Axiomatization of S2S
What is a reasonable axiomatization of S2S?
S2S is the monadic second order theory with two successors (Wikipedia link). It has finite binary strings, operations $s→s0$ and $s→s1$ on strings, and ...
4
votes
1
answer
422
views
Uniform incomparable consistency strengths
For every true arithmetical statement $T$, there are $T$-incomparable $Π^0_1$ statements, but can we find them uniformly in $\text{Theory}(T)$?
Specifically, are there computable $A$ and $B$ such that ...
7
votes
1
answer
490
views
"Robinson arithmetic" for (some) levels of $L$?
I'll write "$\mathcal{L}_\alpha$" for the fragment $\mathcal{L}_{\infty,\omega}\cap L_\alpha$.
Say that a countable admissible $\alpha$ is Robinsonian if there is some sentence $\varphi\in\mathcal{L}...
9
votes
0
answers
526
views
"Hard" separation results in reverse mathematics (or similar)
This is a fairly broad question. In particular, I specify 5 questions (Q1, Q2.1, Q2.2, Q3, Q4) which for me all fall under one umbrella. Since this is unreasonably broad, I'm really interested in an ...