Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
33 votes
15 answers
7k views

What's a magical theorem in logic?

Some theorems are magical: their hypotheses are easy to meet, and when invoked (as lemmas) in the midst of an otherwise routine proof, they deliver the desired conclusion more or less straightaway&...
9 votes
0 answers
471 views

(A little bit) Beyond the E-recursive

The E-recursive functions are a particular generalization of classical recursion theory to the entire set-theoretic universe, $V$. They are defined via a schemes: see Sacks' $E$-recursive intuitions. ...
2 votes
1 answer
176 views

How can Kőnig's Lemma be expressed in Monadic Second-Order Logic of 2 Successors?

I read the following on Wikipedia's page on Monadic Second-Order Logic of Two Successors (MS2S): Weak S2S (WS2S) requires all sets to be finite (note that finiteness is expressible in S2S using Kőnig'...
2 votes
1 answer
154 views

Axiomatization of S2S

What is a reasonable axiomatization of S2S? S2S is the monadic second order theory with two successors (Wikipedia link). It has finite binary strings, operations $s→s0$ and $s→s1$ on strings, and ...
4 votes
1 answer
422 views

Uniform incomparable consistency strengths

For every true arithmetical statement $T$, there are $T$-incomparable $Π^0_1$ statements, but can we find them uniformly in $\text{Theory}(T)$? Specifically, are there computable $A$ and $B$ such that ...
7 votes
1 answer
490 views

"Robinson arithmetic" for (some) levels of $L$?

I'll write "$\mathcal{L}_\alpha$" for the fragment $\mathcal{L}_{\infty,\omega}\cap L_\alpha$. Say that a countable admissible $\alpha$ is Robinsonian if there is some sentence $\varphi\in\mathcal{L}...
9 votes
0 answers
526 views

"Hard" separation results in reverse mathematics (or similar)

This is a fairly broad question. In particular, I specify 5 questions (Q1, Q2.1, Q2.2, Q3, Q4) which for me all fall under one umbrella. Since this is unreasonably broad, I'm really interested in an ...