Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
0 answers
55 views

Universal property of 2-presheaves and pseudo/lax/colax natural transformations

For each small 2-category $\mathscr K$, the 2-category $[\mathscr K^\circ, \mathrm{Cat}]$ of 2-functors and 2-natural transformations has a universal property: it is the free cocompletion of $\mathscr ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
5 votes
0 answers
89 views

Free cocompletion of a 2-category under pseudo colimits, lax colimits, and colax colimits

Let $\mathscr K$ be a small 2-category. It follows from $\mathrm{Cat}$-enriched category theory that the free cocompletion of $\mathscr K$ under strict 2-colimits of 2-functors is given by the 2-...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
9 votes
0 answers
103 views

Adjoining a morphism to a finitely complete category

Let $\mathscr C$ be a finitely complete category. Let $x, y$ be objects of $\mathscr C$. We can describe the universal property of freely adjoining a morphism $x \to y$ to $\mathscr C$: it comprises a ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
9 votes
0 answers
129 views

Is totality a (large) cocompleteness condition?

A locally small category $A$ is called total if its Yoneda embedding $A \to [A^\circ, \mathbf{Set}]$ has a left adjoint. Such categories are necessarily small-cocomplete (since the presheaf category ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
16 votes
2 answers
736 views

Original reference for categories of presheaves as free cocompletions of small categories

It is well known that, for a small category $\mathbf A$, the category $\widehat{\mathbf A} = [\mathbf A^\circ, \mathbf{Set}]$ of presheaves on $\mathbf A$ together with the Yoneda embedding $\mathbf A ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
8 votes
0 answers
165 views

Original reference for the Fam construction

For a category $\mathbf C$, the category of families of $\mathbf C$, denoted $\mathrm{Fam}(\mathbf C)$ is the free coproduct completion of $\mathbf C$. Explicitly, the objects of $\mathbf C$ are given ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 10.6k
11 votes
2 answers
1k views

How to understand adjoint functors?

I asked this same question on MathUnderflow two weeks ago but didn't receive any answer. Now that I am thinking more, it feels like the most suitable place for this question is here. I have a good ...
Bumblebee's user avatar
  • 1,093
9 votes
2 answers
2k views

Is there a useful limit or co-limit of a diagram that has only a single object?

I'm starting to study category theory kind of informally and everytime I read about the definitions of limits and co-limits, the first three examples are always the same: terminal/initial objects, ...
Rorsa's user avatar
  • 923
12 votes
1 answer
2k views

Adjoint Functors as Initial Objects of Some Category

Just as universal arrows can be characterized as initial objects of some appropriate comma category, and (co)limits can be characterized as (initial) terminal objects of the appropriate (co)cone ...
Dmitry V's user avatar
  • 433