All Questions
1 question
5
votes
1
answer
531
views
Extending the definition of "pure of dimension n" from simplicial complexes to simplicial sets?
Recall that a (combinatorial) simplicial complex $X$ is said to be $n$-dimensional if it contains at least one face of dimension $n$ and no faces of dimension $n+1$. Further, an $n$-dimensional ...
- 19.6k