All Questions
11 questions
2
votes
0
answers
202
views
The trigonometric $C^*$-algebra
The trigonometric $C^*$-algebra is the universal $C^*$-algebra generated by $\mathcal{G}=\{x,y,z\}$ subject to relations \begin{align}x^2=x=x^*, &\quad y^2=y=y^*\\ [x, z]=y, &\quad [y,z]=...
4
votes
0
answers
107
views
KK-theory for commutative $C^*$-algebras
The Gelfand--Naimark theorem tells us to regard noncommutative $C^*$-algebras as "noncommutative function spaces". In that spirit $K$-theory the Grothendieck group of "noncommutative ...
3
votes
0
answers
166
views
"Somewhat connected" spaces or algebras
Before we state our question, we give a motivational simple example:
Put $X$ for disjoint union of two circles. However $X$ is not a connected space but it has an open dense subset $U$ such that $U$ ...
4
votes
0
answers
333
views
Other kinds of equivalence relations on the set of idempotents of a Banach or $C^*$-algebra or a ring (Can we get a new kind of K-theory?)
The standard equivalent relations on idempotents of a $C^*$ algebra or a Banach algebra are Murray von Neumann, similarity and homotopy equivalent. In this post we consider two other kinds of ...
2
votes
1
answer
246
views
$C^*$-algebras appearance in study of Lie groupoids and differentiable stacks
I am reading Differentiable stacks, gerbes, and twisted K-Theory by Ping Xu.
To talk about (twisted) K-theory of differentiable stacks, author introduced (page $41$) the set up of $C^*$-algebras. All ...
9
votes
0
answers
364
views
Geometric motivation behind the Fredholm module definition
If $A$ is an involutive algebra over the complex numbers $\mathbb{C}$, then a Fredholm module over $A$ consists of an involutive representation of $A$ on a Hilbert space $H$, together with a self-...
8
votes
1
answer
572
views
Comparing the definitions of $K$-theory and $K$-homology for $C^*$-algebras
In Higson and Roe's Analytic K-homology, for a unital $C*$-algebra $A$, the definitions of K-theory and K-homology have quite a similar flavor.
Roughly, the group $K_0(A)$ is given by the ...
7
votes
1
answer
219
views
$*$-algebras, completions, and $K$-theory
What is an example of a $*$-algebra $\cal{A}$, which admits two non-equivalent norms $\| \cdot \|_1$ and $\| \cdot \|_2$, with respect to which we can complete $\cal{A}$ to give two $C^*$-algebras $...
10
votes
1
answer
236
views
Compute the index of the Dirac operator on $C_0(R^2)$ to obtain Bott element in $K_0$
I am studying the paper of Baum-Connes-Higson to understand the Connes-Kasparov conjecture. In example 4.23, they discuss the case $G=\mathbb{R}^2$. I have constructed the Dirac operator, but I’m ...
6
votes
2
answers
689
views
Generators of the $ K_{0} $-group of the non-commutative torus $ A_{\theta} $ with $ \theta \in \mathbb{Q} $ (i.e. rational rotation algebra)
I am studying the non-commutative torus $ A_{\theta} $.
When $ \theta $ is irrational, $ {K_{0}}(A_{\theta}) $ is generated by $ [1] $ and $ [p_{\theta}] $.
(Note: $ p_{\theta} $ is a projection in $...
0
votes
0
answers
410
views
A noncommutative vector bundle
We know that a noncommutative vector bundle is a finitely generated projective $A$-module where $A$ is a non commutative $C^{*}$ algebra. In this question we introduce a particular non commutative ...