All Questions
14 questions
1
vote
1
answer
180
views
Conditioning a $\mathrm{C}^*$-algebra state with infinite precision
This question (and a second part) have been asked at MSE and gone through two bounties without an answer. I have been beating my head at it for a while without success.
Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a unital $\...
- 1,037
1
vote
1
answer
129
views
Which elements live in the image of the canonical map $X \otimes_\mathcal{F} M \to B(M_*, X)$?
Let $X\subseteq B(H)$ be an operator system and let $M\subseteq B(K)$ be a von Neumann algebra. We form the Fubini-tensor product
$$X \otimes_\mathcal{F} M := \{z \in B(H\otimes K): (\sigma\otimes \...
- 525
3
votes
1
answer
255
views
Takesaki: Lemma about enveloping von Neumann algebra
Consider the following lemma with proof from Takesaki's book "Theory of operator algebra I" (p121):
It appears to me that Takesaki claims at the end of the proof that $\pi(A)_1$ is $\sigma$-...
- 175
5
votes
1
answer
322
views
Takesaki's proof of the Kaplansky density theorem
Consider the following fragment from Takesaki's book "Theory of operator algebra I":
Why is the boxed sentence true? It looks like they replace $A$ by its strong$^*$-closure. Is this ...
- 175
3
votes
1
answer
306
views
Opposite $C^*$ algebras
$\DeclareMathOperator\op{op}$Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra. We know that $A$ admits a natural operator space structure, namely the operator space structure induced by any faithful $*$-representation of $...
- 1,879
2
votes
0
answers
135
views
On crossed product of L^{P} spaces
Let $M$ be a von Neumann algebra with faithful normal state $\varphi$, and $G$ be a group action on $M$ preserving $\varphi$. Then is it true
\begin{align*}
L^{p}(M\rtimes G, \varphi^{M\rtimes G})\...
- 677
3
votes
0
answers
178
views
A point concerning absolute value of functionals
Let $M$ be a von Neumann sub-algebra in $B(H)$. Let $\phi$ be a normal functional on $M$. Assume $\psi$ is a normal functional on $B(H)$ with $\psi_{|_M}=\phi$ (note that $\phi$ and $\psi$ may have ...
- 4,058
17
votes
5
answers
2k
views
If two projections are close, then they are unitarily equivalent
Given two projections $p,q\in B(H)$, it is well-known that if $\|p-q\|<1$, then there exists a unitary $u\in B(H)$ with $q=upu^*$.
The proof that immediately occurs to me uses comparison of ...
- 2,793
3
votes
1
answer
481
views
Question on structure of von Neumann algebras, clarification in Conway's "A course in operator theory"
I was reading the section on the structure of type I von Neumann algebras in John B. Conway's "A course in operator theory" and a few questions about certain definitions and references arose, I was ...
- 417
12
votes
1
answer
901
views
Is there a proof that the $C^{*}$-algebras don't see the invariant subspace problem?
This post is an appendix of this one.
Let $H$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space and $B(H)$ the algebra of bounded operators.
Invariant subspace problem: Let $T \in B(H)$. Is ...
8
votes
0
answers
952
views
About generator and isomorphism problems for free groups operator algebras
Let $H$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space.
The $C^{*}$-algebras and von Neumann here unital and subalgebras of $B(H)$.
Definition : Let $\mathcal{A}$ be $C^{*}$-algebra (resp. a von ...
6
votes
1
answer
680
views
Is there an operator algebraic reformulation of the invariant subspace problem?
Let $H$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space and $B(H)$ the algebra of bounded operators.
Invariant subspace problem: Let $T \in B(H)$. Is there a non-trivial closed $T$-invariant ...
6
votes
1
answer
643
views
Is there an irreducible, noncompact commuting, nonnormal operator, with spectrum strictly continuous?
Let $H$ be an infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space.
Definition: The commutant $\mathcal{S}'$ of a subset $\mathcal{S} \subset B(H)$ is $ \{A \in B(H) : AB=BA \ , \ \forall B \in \mathcal{S} \}...
5
votes
2
answers
988
views
Projections in a W*-algebra as a continuous lattice?
A continuous lattice is a complete lattice $L$ in which every element $y$ is equal to $\bigvee${$x \in L \mid x \ll y$} where $x \ll y$ ("x approximates y" or "x is way below y") if for any directed ...
- 85