Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
7 votes
1 answer
361 views

Shouldn't we expect analytic (in the Berkovich sense) étale cohomology of a number field to be the cohomology of the Artin–Verdier site?

Let $K$ be a number field. Consider $X=\mathcal{M}(\mathcal O_K)$ the global Berkovich analytic space associated to $\mathcal O_K$ endowed with the norm $\|\cdot\|=\max\limits_{\sigma:K \...
Lukas Heger's user avatar
16 votes
2 answers
941 views

Higher-rank Archimedean valuations of $\mathbb{Q}$, does it exist?

I was reading the proof of Ostrowski's theorem, with an eye toward the Zariski-Riemann space (as well as adic space, Berkovich space, etc.) In the proof, the value group is always assumed to be in $\...
zxx's user avatar
  • 343
2 votes
0 answers
269 views

Is there any relation between Berkovich spaces over $\Bbb Z$ and Arakelov theory?

As I understand it, both Arakelov geometry and Berkovich geometry over $\Bbb Z$ (or $\mathcal O_K$) consider geometric objects that contain in some sense information about both archimdean and ...
Lukas Heger's user avatar