Questions tagged [axiom-of-choice]
An important and fundamental axiom in set theory sometimes called Zermelo's axiom of choice. It was formulated by Zermelo in 1904 and states that, given any set of mutually disjoint nonempty sets, there exists at least one set that contains exactly one element in common with each of the nonempty sets. The axiom of choice is related to the first of Hilbert's problems.
557
questions
9
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Minimal prime ideals and Axiom of Choice(revised version)
From the page:
Existence of prime ideals and Axiom of Choice.,
I have found that The existence of prime ideals in commutative rings is equivalent to the Boolean Prime Ideal theorem. But $BPI$ is ...
12
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Existence of prime ideals and Axiom of Choice.
One of the must obvious equivalences of Axiom of Choice is the converse of Krull Theorem.
Bernhard Banaschewski in the Article titled by A New Proof that “Krull implies Zorn” showed a very simple ...
13
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Hartogs number and the three power sets
One of the most important constructions in ZF+$\lnot$AC is Hartogs number, defined as:
$$\aleph(X)=\min\lbrace\alpha:|\alpha|\nleq|X|\rbrace$$
We can prove that this ordinal always exists in the ...
1
vote
3
answers
1k
views
Axiom of Choice and Vitali's theorem [duplicate]
Possible Duplicate:
Axiom of choice and non measurable set
I am told somebody has shown the equivalence of the Axiom of Choice with
existence of non-measurable Lebesgue sets on the real line, ...
2
votes
0
answers
205
views
Logical relationships between weakenings of AC
What are the known logical implications between weak choice principles like $DC_\kappa$", the ...
3
votes
1
answer
829
views
Counterexemple to Urysohn's lemma in a topos without denombrable choice ?
Hello !
The Urysohn's Lemma assert that in every topological spaces which is normal two closed subset may be separated by a real valued function. It's proof use axiom of countable choice (but not the ...
28
votes
0
answers
2k
views
Supercompact and Reinhardt cardinals without choice
A friend of mine and I ran into the following question while reading about proper forcing, and have been unable to resolve it:
Definition. A cardinal $\kappa$ is supercompact if for all ordinals $\...
14
votes
1
answer
585
views
Is choice needed to establish the existence of idempotent ultrafilters?
It is well known that the Stone–Čech compactification $\beta \mathbb N^+$ of the positive natural numbers has the structure of a compact left semitopological semigroup and hence, by Ellis's lemma, has ...
47
votes
0
answers
2k
views
Concerning proofs from the axiom of choice that ℝ³ admits surprising geometrical decompositions: Can we prove there is no Borel decomposition?
This question follows up on a comment I made on Joseph O'Rourke's
recent question, one of several questions here on mathoverflow
concerning surprising geometric partitions of space using the axiom
of ...
26
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Sizes of bases of vector spaces without the axiom of choice
Assuming the axiom of choice does not hold we have that there is a vector space without a basis. The situation can be, in some sense, worse. It is consistent that there are vector spaces that have two ...
6
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Countably generated $\sigma$-algebras of ${\mathcal P}({\mathbb R})$ and choice
It is consistent with ${\sf ZF}$ that the reals are the countable union of countable sets. Since any countable set is Borel, it follows that in any such pathological universe, let's call it $W$, every ...
5
votes
1
answer
513
views
On successive regular cardinals with no ladders
Definition: Let $\kappa$ be an $\aleph$ cardinal, we say that $\langle f_\alpha\colon\alpha\to\kappa\mid\alpha<\kappa^+\rangle$ is a ladder if every $f_\alpha$ is injective.
Equivalently this is ...
21
votes
4
answers
3k
views
What sort of large cardinal can $\aleph_1$ be without the axiom of choice?
Assuming the axiom of choice it is very easy to see that $\aleph_1$ is a regular Joe of a successor cardinal. It is not very large in any way except the fact that it is the first uncountable cardinal.
...
27
votes
5
answers
4k
views
What are the known implications of "There exists a Reinhardt cardinal" in the theory "ZF + j"?
This is, alas, in large part a series of questions on unpublished work of Hugh Woodin; it's also quite frivolous if Reinhardt cardinals turn out inconsistent.
Definitions:
Call $\kappa$ an $I-1(\...
2
votes
2
answers
972
views
Axiom of choice and convergence
Hi fellows,
I was wondering. Is the axiom of choice used to show that $\mathbb{R}$ is complete? If yes, is there a way to construct monotonic bounded sequences that do not converge?
Thanks in ...
9
votes
2
answers
1k
views
What sort of structure can amorphous sets support?
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every cardinal is either finite (i.e., an element of $\omega$) or Dedekind-infinite (i.e., in bijection with a proper subset of itself). This dichotomy is not true in ZF, ...
21
votes
1
answer
2k
views
The Continuum Hypothesis and Countable Unions
I recently edited an answer of mine on math.SE which discussed the implication of the two assertions:
$AH(0)$ which is $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_1$, and
$CH$ which says that if $A\subseteq 2^{\omega}$ and ...
6
votes
3
answers
821
views
Surjective Maps onto $\aleph$-numbers
We denote by $\frak p\le q$ the abbreviation that there is $f:\frak p\to q$ which is injective, and by $\frak p\le^\ast q$ we abbreviate that there is a surjection from $\frak q$ onto $\frak p$.
If $...
6
votes
0
answers
299
views
What are these sets in Freyd's model?
Recall Freyd's model of $ZF +\neg AC$ (as recounted in MacLane and Moerdijk's book Sheaves in Geometry and Logic): it arises as the Fourman interpretation of the topos of sheaves on a particular ...
18
votes
0
answers
688
views
Antichains of Cardinals in ZF Without Choice...
With the Axiom of Choice, the cardinals form a nice linearly ordered "set". In the absence of the Axiom of Choice, the cardinals form a partially ordered "set". Broadly, I am wondering what ...
10
votes
2
answers
650
views
New Foundations and weaker forms of choice
New Foundations (introduced by Quine) proves that $AC$ is false. Out of curiosity, is $NF$ consistent with countable choice or dependent choice? What's the strongest consequence of choice still ...
51
votes
1
answer
6k
views
Does $2^X=2^Y\Rightarrow |X|=|Y|$ imply the axiom of choice?
The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis can be stated as $2^{\aleph_\alpha}=\aleph_{\alpha+1}$. We know that GCH implies AC (Jech, The Axiom of Choice, Theorem 9.1 p.133).
In fact, a relatively weak ...
30
votes
8
answers
3k
views
Unique existence and the axiom of choice
The axiom of choice states that arbitrary products of nonempty sets are nonempty.
Clearly, we only need the axiom of choice to show the non-emptiness of the product if
there are infinitely many ...
14
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Two questions about vector spaces absent AC.
My questions are motivated by
this question
which asks, in the absence of AC, whether a subspace of a vector space with a basis must have a basis.
Does every real vector space embed isomorphically ...
27
votes
1
answer
3k
views
If $V$ is a vector space with a basis. $W\subseteq V$ has to have a basis too?
Suppose $V$ is a vector space, we say that $\mathcal B$ is a basis for $V$ if:
Every $v\in V$ can be written as a linear combination of elements of $\mathcal B$;
If $\sum\alpha_i b_i = 0$, where $\...
9
votes
0
answers
1k
views
Does every group of order bigger than 2 have a non-trivial automorphism?
If $G$ is a non-abelian group, then it has a non-trivial inner automorphism (conjugation by any non-central element). If $G$ is abelian of exponent bigger than 2, then the inversion map is an ...
9
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Example of a topos that violates countable choice
At this nLab page we have the line
In contrast, any topos that violates countable choice, of which there are plenty, must also violate internal COSHEP.
It doesn't give an example, and neither does ...
5
votes
2
answers
601
views
Forcing the nonexistence of a certain set
I have a certain set-theoretic axiom (WISC) which follows from Choice (this is a nuking a fly BTW), but which I suspect is independent of ZF. To show this I need to show that a certain set does not ...
14
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Is it consistent relative to ZF that $\frak c = \aleph_\omega$?
In ZFC we know that the continuum cannot have cofinality $\omega$.
However, in the Feferman-Levy model we have that $\frak c=\aleph_1$, and that $\operatorname{cf}(\omega_1)=\omega$. In fact in the ...
4
votes
1
answer
425
views
Is the ordering principle preserved in generic extensions?
The ordering principle says that every set can be linearly ordered.
In a previous question Why are some axioms preserved in generic extensions? Asaf Karagila asked which axioms are preserved in ...
6
votes
2
answers
868
views
Why are some axioms preserved in generic extensions?
It is a known theorem that for a model of $ZF$, $M$, if $M\models AC$ and $G$ is a $P$-generic filter over $M$, for some $P\in M$, then $M[G]\models AC$.
On the other hand, it is long known that ...
17
votes
5
answers
2k
views
Forcing over models without the axiom of choice
In the vast majority of papers forcing is always developed over ZFC.
Not surprisingly too, since infintary combinatorial principles are often used to prove results based on properties such as chain ...
19
votes
1
answer
4k
views
Countable unions and the axiom of countable choice
Let us denote by ACC the axiom of countable choice, namely the assertion that the product of countably many non-empty sets is non-empty, and denote by UCC the assertion that a countable union of ...
7
votes
1
answer
851
views
Symmetric extensions and class forcing
Suppose $V\models ZFC$ and $P\in V$ is a poset of forcing conditions.
It is a basic theorem in forcing that $V[G]\models ZFC$ for any generic extension by a $V$-generic filter $G$.
It is also known ...
4
votes
1
answer
369
views
Does ZF prove that proximity spaces are completely regular?
(This is based on my earlier question, but I think this one would be easier to answer.)
Let $\langle X,\mathbf{\delta} \hspace{.01 in} \rangle$ be a separated proximity space, and let $\cal{T}\hspace{...
10
votes
4
answers
958
views
On a weak choice principle
[PLEASE SEE EDITS AT BOTTOM OF QUESTION]
Consider the following set-theoretic axiom:
For each set $X$ there exists a set-indexed collection $\{C_i \to X\}_{i\in I_X}$ of surjections such that for ...
9
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Axiom of choice and non-measurable set
We know that existence of a Lebesgue non-measurable set follows from the Axiom Of Choice. Is the converse true? That is, does the existence of a Lebesgue non-measurable set imply the Axiom Of Choice?...
18
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Does ZF prove that topological groups are completely regular?
Let $\mathbf{G} = \langle G,\cdot,\mathcal{T}\;\rangle$ be a topological group. Let $\mathbf{e}$ be the identity element of $\langle G,\cdot \rangle$.
Assume $\{\mathbf{e}\}$ is closed in $\langle G,\...
3
votes
1
answer
481
views
Can a Vitali Set be constructed without AC?
For the purposes of this discussion, let a Vitali Set be any subset $V\subseteq{}[0,1)$ such that for $V_q:=\{x+q\;|\;x<1-q,\;x\in{}V\}\cup\{x+q-1\;|\;x\geq{}1-q,\;x\in{}V\}$ there is a countable ...
25
votes
2
answers
4k
views
Can a Vitali set be Lebesgue measurable? (ZF)
Here is the definition of Lebesgue measure.
The standard proof that Vitali sets are not Lebesgue measurable uses countable additivity of Lebesgue measure, which is not a theorem of ZF. (In ...
7
votes
1
answer
429
views
For models of ZF, if for some $A$ we have $L[A] = L$, what can we deduce about $A$?
Suppose $V$ is a model of ZF. Within $V$ we have $L$ which is a model of ZFC, furthermore $L[A]$ is a model of choice for every $A\in V$.
Suppose $A=\emptyset$ then clearly $L[A]=L$, furthermore if $...
19
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Haar measures in Solovay's model
Haar measure is a measure on locally compact abelian groups which is invariants to translations. For example, the Lebesgue measure on the reals is such measure.
It can be shown without the use of the ...
26
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Axiom of choice: ultrafilter vs. Vitali set
It is well known that from a free (non-principal) ultrafilter on $\omega$ one can define a non-measurable set of reals. The older example of a non-measurable set is the Vitali set,
a set of ...
41
votes
2
answers
2k
views
On the difference between two concepts of even cardinalities: Is there a model of ZF set theory in which every infinite set can be split into pairs, but not every infinite set can be cut in half?
An interesting question has arisen over at this
math.stackexchange
question
about two concepts of even in the context of infinite
cardinalities, which are equivalent under the axiom of
choice, but ...
7
votes
5
answers
1k
views
Is Lebesgue/Borel non-measurability actually caused by non-uniqueness?
In ZFC, every construction of a Lebesgue or Borel non-measurable set uses the axiom of choice. None of them that I've seen use choice to define a unique set, even though it's entirely possible to do ...
20
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Axiom of choice and bases of vector spaces over a fixed field
Let $k$ be a field. In 1984 Andreas Blass proved that the axiom "for every extension $K|k$, every vector space over $K$ has a basis" implies the axiom of choice. He also raised the question
Does ...
23
votes
3
answers
3k
views
Half Cantor-Bernstein without choice
I had a discussion with one of my teachers the other day, which boiled to the following question:
Assume ZF. Let $A,B$ be sets such that there exist $f\colon A\to B$ which is injective and $g\colon A\...
11
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Indecomposable vector spaces and the axiom of choice
It is a known result by A. Blass that the axiom of choice is equivalent to the assertion that every vector space has a basis. (Rubin's Equivalents of the Axiom of Choice: form B)
It is also known ...
2
votes
0
answers
302
views
algebraic dual and axiom of choice [duplicate]
If $K$ is a field, the dual of $K^{({\mathbb N})}$ is $K^{\mathbb N}$, and axiom of choice implies that the natural map from $K^{({\mathbb N})}$ to the dual of $K^{\mathbb N}$ is
far from being ...
4
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Chevalley's valuation extension theorem and the axiom of choice
Hello,
Do we know if the axiom of choice is needed for Chevalley's valuation/place extension theorem (i.e. the theorem that states that for every valued field and a field extension, one can extend ...