Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
12 votes
1 answer
969 views

Montgomery's pair correlation function without RH?

In the theory of the Riemann zeta function, Montgomery's Pair correlation function is defined as $$ F(\alpha) = \frac{1}{N(T)} \sum_{T < \gamma, \gamma' < 2T} T^{i \alpha (\gamma - \gamma')} \...
kola's user avatar
  • 123
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

The Correlation of the Möbius Function and Dirichlet Characters

Let $\chi$ be a Dirichlet character, and define $\phi_\chi (n)$ so that it satisfies $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \phi_\chi (n)n^{-s}=\frac{\zeta(s-1)}{L(s,\chi)}.$$ In other words $$\phi_{\chi}(n)=\sum_{d|...
Eric Naslund's user avatar
  • 11.4k
6 votes
2 answers
315 views

Functional equation and/or growth estimates for a shifted L function

Consider the $L$-series defined by $$L_{\alpha,\chi}(s) = \sum_{n\geq 1} \frac{e^{2\pi i \alpha \Omega(n)} \chi(n)}{n^s} = \prod_p \left(1 - \frac{e^{2\pi i \alpha} \chi(p)}{p^s}\right)^{-1}.$$ It ...
H A Helfgott's user avatar
  • 20.2k
5 votes
0 answers
195 views

Moments of completed L-functions?

This is a follow up question to this one. It seems that results on moments of L-functions, that is, estimates for integrals of the form $$\int^{T}_1|\zeta(\sigma+it)|^{2k}dt$$ are typically for the ...
Tian An's user avatar
  • 3,799
4 votes
0 answers
450 views

Question about a paper by Franca and LeClair in analytic number theory

I am reading an article "Transcendental equations satisfied by the individual zeros of Riemann $\zeta$, Dirichlet and modular L-functions" by G. Franca and A. LeClair (2015) see here. The ...
Williams's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
316 views

Explicit formula: explicit work with general smoothing?

The following is a literature question, in the sense that I already know how to do what I am asking about, and in fact have already done it; now I'd like to write a brief historical overview as an ...
H A Helfgott's user avatar
  • 20.2k
3 votes
1 answer
426 views

On link between Riemann hypothesis and partial GRH

Is there a way to show that if the Riemann hypothesis holds for Dirichlet L-function associated to primitive Dirichlet character (excluding trivial character $\chi(1)$ which could be qualified of ...
Bertrand's user avatar
  • 1,199
2 votes
1 answer
587 views

Bounds for Dirichlet L-functions

Let $L$ denote a Dirichlet L-function attached to the primitive character $\chi$. What are the best known bounds for $L(\sigma+it, \chi)$? PS: For $L=\zeta$ and $0\leq\sigma\leq 1$, i'm aware of a ...
Q_p's user avatar
  • 1,019
2 votes
0 answers
99 views

The logarithmic derivative of a twisted L-function?

Let $F$ be a quadratic number field with class number $h_F = 1$. Let $\zeta_F$ be the Dedekind zeta function, we have $$ \frac{\zeta_F ' (1+it)}{\zeta_F (1+it)} \ll \frac{\log t}{\log\log t} .$$ (I ...
Misaka 16559's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
152 views

A mixed of the Dedekind zeta function and the L-function

I have recently come across the following function, which seems like a "mix" between the Dedekind zeta function and the L-function: $\sum_I\frac{\chi_k(N(I))}{N(I)^s}$ where $\chi_k(n)$ is the ...
pencil_sharpener's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
195 views

Are Li's numbers $\lambda_n$ absolutely convergent for $n>1$?

Li's numbers $\{\lambda_n\}$ are defined as $$\lambda_n=\frac{1}{(n-1)!}\frac{d^n}{ds^n} [s^{n-1}\log\xi(s)]_{s=1} $$ for all positive integers $n$. Also $\lambda_n$ is given as a sum over the non ...
user avatar