All Questions
15 questions
4
votes
1
answer
172
views
The $E$-(co)homology of $\mathrm{BGL}(R)^+$ and the algebraic $K$-theory of $R$
$\DeclareMathOperator\BGL{BGL}$In the paper, 'Two-primary Algebraic $K$-theory of rings of integers in number fields', Rognes and Weibel compute the $2$-torsion part in the algebraic $K$-theory of the ...
- 43
11
votes
2
answers
864
views
Solving polynomial equations in spectra?
Let $M$ be the mod-$p$ Moore spectrum where $p \geq 3$ is a (power of) a prime. Then $M$ satisfies the "polynomial equation" $M \wedge M \cong M \oplus \Sigma M$. Is this a general ...
- 63.9k
19
votes
2
answers
702
views
Besides $F_q$, for which rings $R$ is $K_i(R)$ completely known?
With the exception of finite fields and "trivial examples", which rings $R$ are such that Quillen's algebraic $K$ groups $K_i(R)$ are completely known for all $i\geq 0$?
Here, by "trivial examples" ...
user1437
2
votes
0
answers
178
views
construction of $K_0$-group and Karoubian completion
Let $A$ be a ring. The $K_0$ group of $A$ can be defined in most
old fashioned way as the Grothendieck group of the set of isomorphism classes
of its finitely generated projective $R$ modules, ...
- 6,018
24
votes
3
answers
4k
views
Plus construction considerations.
In order to realise the K-groups of a ring as the homotopy groups of some space associated to that ring, Quillen proposed the following (roughly-sketched) construction:
Recall that $K_1(R) = GL(R)/E(...
- 1,105
9
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Roadmap for Quillen 1
Question
Suppose you grasped and enjoyed reading Quillen's "Higher Algebraic K-theory I". Now, if you could go back in time to when you started studying algebraic topology and create a reading list / ...
- 650
34
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Is every ''group-completion'' map an acyclic map?
I start with a longer discussion which will result in a precise version of the question. I am puzzled about an issue with the
Quillen plus construction. I have seen outstanding experts being confused ...
- 20.9k
11
votes
1
answer
432
views
$K_3(\mathbb{Z})$ and $\pi ^S_3$
This is an afterthought on this MO question, and also on Gannon's book mentioned there, about $K_3(\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}/48$. Neither the question nor the book mentions a possible connection with the ...
- 38k
12
votes
2
answers
1k
views
$K$-theory backwards
Let $R$ be a ring. The $K$-theory of $(Mod(R)^{f.g.proj},\oplus)$ is obtained by first throwing out non-isomorphisms and then group completing. What happens if these steps are reversed?
That is, ...
- 63.9k
5
votes
0
answers
415
views
Modern context for hypercohomology spectra
In Thomason's paper Algebraic K-theory and étale cohomology, (Ann. ENS 1985, Numdam link) Thomason develops an elaborate theory of hypercohomology spectra, $\mathbb{H}(X,\mathcal{F})$ for presheafs of ...
- 254
5
votes
0
answers
311
views
Homotopy type of a $4$-manifold with finite fundamental group (paper by S. Bauer)
I'm studying Stefan Bauer's paper
The homotopy type of a 4-manifold with finite fundamental group. In: tom Dieck T. (eds) Algebraic Topology and Transformation Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics,...
- 6,018
14
votes
1
answer
800
views
Is there a category whose isomorphisms are precisely the simple homotopy equivalences?
If we start with the category of finite complexes and continuous maps, and then identify two morphisms iff they are homotopic, we get the homotopy category of finite complexes, and it is trivial to ...
- 18.7k
11
votes
0
answers
264
views
Direct proof of the equivalence of symmetric monoidal $K$-theory and exact sequence $K$-theory?
When all exact sequences split in $C$, we have $\Omega B C \simeq K(C):=\Omega Q(C)$. Heuristically, this is because the space of upper-triangular matrices is contractible. Can this be made precise? I ...
- 63.9k
6
votes
0
answers
144
views
$K_0$ an $KH_0$ of a normal crossing variety
Let $k$ be a field (say, algebraically closed to fix the ideas) and let $X$ be a strict (aka simple) normal crossing variety over $k$, so that $X$ is union of regular varieties with intersection that ...
- 61
6
votes
0
answers
312
views
homotopy domination that splits a non-split epimorphism and still wants to be a homotopy equivalence
Can a homotopy domination by a space supporting a free action of $G$ be promoted to a homotopy equivalence with such a space? As stated, this is not a serious question (multiply by an $EG$). But with ...
- 5,575