Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
38 votes
0 answers
5k views

Homology of $\mathrm{PGL}_2(F)$

Update: As mentioned below, the answer to the original question is a strong No. However, the case of $\pi_4$ remains, and actually I think that this one would follow from Suslin's conjecture on ...
Peter Scholze's user avatar
19 votes
7 answers
3k views

Universal cover of SL2(R) admits no central extensions?

Is it true that the universal cover of $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ has no non-trivial central extensions... as an abstract group? (that's certainly true as a Lie group) Motivation: I have a projective ...
André Henriques's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
566 views

Importance of third homology of $\operatorname{SL}_{2}$ over a field

$\DeclareMathOperator\SL{SL}$I am reading some papers about the third homology of linear groups. In particular for the $\SL_{2}$ over a field. Why is it important to study these homologies? I have ...
Liddo's user avatar
  • 259
1 vote
0 answers
193 views

Non-existence of nontrivial finite group extension of any simply-connected Lie group

Let $Q$ be a simply-connected compact Lie group. Can one outline the proof (or provide the counter examples if my statement is false) that there does not exist any group $G$ (with no topology) ...
wonderich's user avatar
  • 10.5k