Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
45 votes
8 answers
14k views

How should one think about sheafification and the difference between a sheaf and a presheaf

The first time I got in touch with the abstract notion of a sheaf on a topological space $X$, I thought of it as something which assigns to an open set $U$ of $X$ something like the ring of continuous ...
roger123's user avatar
  • 2,782
16 votes
1 answer
448 views

Zorn's lemma for Grothendieck sites

In every treatment of Grothendieck sites I can find, flasque sheaves are not defined in the way one would naïvely expect from ordinary sheaf cohomology; namely instead of saying that "restriction ...
cat man's user avatar
  • 163
14 votes
2 answers
904 views

What's the easiest example of a morphism of topoi that is not from that of a site?

A topos is defined to be a category that's equivalent to the category of sheaves on a site. Morphisms between topoi is defined by a pair of adjoint functors that behave like pull-back/push-forward of ...
Yuhao Huang's user avatar
  • 5,052
10 votes
1 answer
495 views

Properties of the petit Zariski topos

What are some (intrinsically formulated) properties of the locally ringed topos $(\mathbf{Sh}(X),\mathcal{O}_X)$ for some scheme $X$, which do not hold for arbitrary locally ringed toposes? Is there, ...
HeinrichD's user avatar
  • 5,482
9 votes
1 answer
804 views

Is the analytification functor part of a geometric morphism of topoi?

Let $Sh(\mathsf{\mathbb{C}-fAlg}^{op})$ be the topos of zariski sheaves on finitely genertaed $\mathbb{C}$-algebras. A complex analytic space for our purpose is a locally ringed space locally ...
Saal Hardali's user avatar
  • 7,789
9 votes
0 answers
378 views

Is there any notion of "smoothification" from $\mathbb{R}$-schemes to generalized smooth spaces?

I will write $\operatorname{Diff}$ to denote a category of generalized smooth spaces e.g. $Sh(\mathsf{CartSp})$. Is there a version of $\operatorname{Diff}$ for which there exists a functor $\mathcal{...
Saal Hardali's user avatar
  • 7,789
8 votes
1 answer
319 views

How are the left and the right group of a bitorsor related?

This question arose from my answer to To what extent does a torsor determine a group: it turns out that I do not know one thing about it. Let $G$, $G'$ be groups in some nice enough category (you may ...
მამუკა ჯიბლაძე's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
562 views

Category of copresheaves over commutative monoids

Let C be a symmetric monoidal category. Let Comm(C) be the category of commutative monoids in C. Consider the topos X = CoPSh(Comm(C)) of covariant functors from Comm(C) to the category Set of sets. ...
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
291 views

Direct and inverse image terminology

Let $f\colon X\to Y$ be a continuous map. Then $f$ induces a geometric morphism $f^\ast\dashv f_\ast\colon \mathrm{Sh}(X)\leftrightarrows\mathrm{Sh}(Y)$, whose left adjoint is called inverse image and ...
user1005113's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
255 views

Subobject classifier for sheaves on large sites with WISC

Let $\mathsf{C}$ be a possibly large category with a Grothendieck topology satisfying the Weakly Initial Set of Covers condition: there is for each $X$ a set (not a proper class) of covering families ...
Robbie Lyman's user avatar
  • 1,996
6 votes
1 answer
239 views

What does an ideal correspond to in the internal language of sheaves?

Suppose I have a sheaf $\mathcal F$ in some topos $\mathrm{Sh}(\mathcal C)$. Then this becomes the sheaf of rings from algebraic geometry when described as a ring in the internal language of the topos....
DatBoi's user avatar
  • 61
3 votes
0 answers
215 views

How to read the definition of Grothendieck Pretopology in SGA4?

In SGA4, the first axiom of a Grothendieck pretopology is given as: PT0: Pour tout objet $X$ de $C$, les morphismes des familles de morphismes de $Cov(𝑋)$ sont quarrables. (Rappelons qu’un morphisme ...
Joey Eremondi's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
530 views

Flasque sheaves on a site

This is a cross-post from MathStackexchange. We define a flasque sheaf on a site as one whose first Čech cohomology vanishes for every covering of every object of the site. I know this definition is ...
Jehu314's user avatar
  • 153
3 votes
0 answers
285 views

What is the logical progression in algebraic tools for studying spaces (varieties -> schemes, sheaves, topos etc.)?

Some algebraists (Cartier, Weil, Atiyah, etc.) sometimes speak of geometry as a long history of essentially asking the same question—"what is space, and how would one describe a space uniquely". ...
i am circle's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
307 views

Locality in Grothendieck Topologies

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category and $\mathcal{J}$ be a Grothendieck topology on it (i.e., $(\mathcal{C},\mathcal{J})$ is a site). Then what is a good notion of locality in it? I came up with the ...
Chetan Vuppulury's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
361 views

epimorphism of fppf sheaves is an fppf morphism

I asked this question on math.stackexchange (https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2693471/epimorphism-of-fppf-sheaves-is-an-fppf-morphism) but didn't get an answer. Maybe someone here can help. ...
user404873's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
266 views

Relationship between coherent toposes/coherent logic and coherent sheaves

I've heard it claimed that the adjective "coherent" in logic/topos theory (i.e. coherent logic, coherent toposes, coherent categories) was adopted to fit in with the terminology of coherent sheaves in ...
dorebell's user avatar
  • 3,058
1 vote
0 answers
82 views

Do the covariant maps of a sheaf with transfer automatically satisfy a dual gluing axiom?

I'm interested in describing a notion of equivariant sheaves that uses Mackey functors on topoi. We can describe a genuine G-spectrum as a spectral Mackey functor on the topos of finite G-sets. If we ...
Doron Grossman-Naples's user avatar