Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
10 votes
0 answers
481 views

What is the precise definition of "Hypergeometric motives over $\mathbb{Q}$"?

The question is as in the title, but here is some background: Section 4 of this paper by Beukers, Cohen and Mellit is called "Hypergeometric motive over $\mathbb{Q}$" but no actual (pure) ...
naf's user avatar
  • 10.5k
3 votes
1 answer
758 views

Motives and topological data analysis

Here is some meta mathematics question. During the last decade there has been some progress in the field of applied maths, called topological data analysis. The setup starts with some set of points in ...
nxir's user avatar
  • 1,479
1 vote
0 answers
270 views

Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory versus Weil cohomological theory [closed]

Can someone enlighten me what is the difference between an Eilenberg-Steenrod cohomological theory ( See here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eilenberg%E2%80%93Steenrod_axioms ), and a Weil ...
Angel65's user avatar
  • 595
2 votes
0 answers
137 views

Thickness of category of abelian motives

A motive over a field $k$ is of abelian type if it belongs to the thick and rigid subcategory of Chow motives spanned by the motives of abelian varieties over $k$. I understand that this is the ...
IMeasy's user avatar
  • 3,779
1 vote
0 answers
90 views

The splitting pattern of the Killing form of an algebraic group and the Tits index

Let us assume that $G$ is an anisotropic semisimple, connected algebraic group over a field $k$ of characteristic zero. Let $K_G$ denote the class of its Killing form in the Witt ring of $k$. Let $X$ ...
nxir's user avatar
  • 1,479
26 votes
1 answer
1k views

What's motivic about $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy theory? What's motivic about correspondences?

I come today to mathoverflow to showcase some genuine confusion about the motivic world. I want to ask some questions before actually starting to study the subject, to build some sense of direction. I ...
display llvll's user avatar
11 votes
1 answer
893 views

K-equivalence ⇒ isomorphism of Chow motives?

An old conjecture of Bondal–Orlov–Kawamata predicts that K-equivalent varieties are D-equivalent, see Kawamata's paper D-equivalence and K-equivalence for definitions. In particular this applies to ...
Evgeny Shinder's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
237 views

What are the consequences of the finite generation of $\operatorname{Ext}^1_{\mathcal{O}_F}(\mathbb{1},M)$?

Let $F$ be a number fields. Conjecturally, there is a rigid $\mathbb{Q}$-linear abelian category of mixed motives over $F$. Let $\mathbb{1}$ denotes the unit object of this category. Given a mixed ...
Stabilo's user avatar
  • 1,479
9 votes
0 answers
439 views

Uncountably many non-isomorphic Tate modules

Do there exist uncountably many abelian surfaces with good reduction over $\mathbb{Q}_p$ with pairwise non-isomorphic rational $p$-adic Tate modules? If we took $l$-adic Tate modules there would be ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
245 views

What unramified Galois representations come from geometry?

I think we don't know what crystalline representations come from geometry. What about the unramified ones? Specifically let $\phi:\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}_p}/\mathbb{Q}_p)\to GL_n(\mathbb{Q}...
user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
361 views

Would full resolution of singularities have cohomological implications beyond the alteration theory?

De Jong's result on alterations allows one to show the potential semistability of certain Galois representations arising from cohomology of varieties (among other things). If we knew the existence of ...
user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
108 views

Algorithmically recover the $l'$-adic Galois representation from the $l$-adic one (assuming the Tate conjecture)

Let $E$ be a number field. For any finite Galois extension $E\subset F$ there is a continuous homomorphism $\pi_F:\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{E}/E)\to \mathrm{Gal}(F/E)$. Let $X$ be a smooth projective ...
user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
265 views

Explicit linear object underlying $l$-adic cohomology for almost all $l$

If you are working with closed manifolds you can consider cohomology with any coefficients you like but ultimately everything is determined by the singular cohomology with $\mathbb{Z}$-coefficients. ...
user avatar
9 votes
0 answers
276 views

Which field extensions do not affect Chow groups?

Let $X$ be a (say, smooth projective) variety over a field $k$. For which $K$ it is known that the ("ordinary", that is, not higher) Chow groups of $X$ map onto that of $X_K$ bijectively? ...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
174 views

Are "strongly finite dimensional" homotopy invariant sheaves with transfers (locally) constant?

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $S$ be a homotopy invariant $\mathbb{Q}$-linear sheaf with transfers in the sense of Voevodsky–Suslin, and assume that the dimension of $S(U)$ (over $\...
Mikhail Bondarko's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
300 views

Why the scissor relations in Grothendieck rings?

Let $k$ be a field, and let $K_0(V_k)$ be the Grothendieck ring of $k$-varieties. One type of relation which defines $K_0(V_k)$ is the following: if $A$ is a $k$-variety and $C$ a closed subset of $A$,...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,547
5 votes
0 answers
383 views

What is the motive of $\operatorname{Bun}_G(X)$?

$\DeclareMathOperator\Bun{Bun}$Let $X$ be a scheme over algebraically closed field $k$, $G$ a reductive group and $\Bun_G(X)$ the stack of $G$ bundles on $X$. Write $[\Bun_G(X)]\in K_\text{st}$ for ...
Pulcinella's user avatar
  • 5,701
2 votes
0 answers
118 views

Adjoining data about singularities to "correct" the category of pure motives?

There are a few well known constructions of potential categories of pure motives for smooth projective varieties over a field. My understanding is that modulo the standard conjectures these should be ...
Patrick Elliott's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
476 views

Arc space & formal loops in motivic integration

One of the most essential ingredients in the theory of motivic integration are the space of arcs of a given $k$-variety $X$. This is a scheme, whose $k$-rational points are the $k[[t]]$-valued points ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 6,018
3 votes
0 answers
178 views

Finiteness results in the category of schemes up to $\mathbb{A}^1$-homotopy

In algebraic geometry, we know that there exist geometrical conditions on a scheme $X/k$ for having finitely many rational points when $k$ is a number field. Namely for curves there is the Mordell ...
curious math guy's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
245 views

Pseudo-Abelian Completion in the constrution of Motifs (by Y. Manin)

I reading Yuri Manin's famous paper on "CORRESPONDENCES, MOTIFS AND MONOIDAL TRANSFORMATIONS" and struggle with his definition for so called pseudo-abelian completion given on page 453 by a reason I ...
user267839's user avatar
  • 6,018
1 vote
0 answers
107 views

Why is $\Delta - p_0 - p_{2}$ a projector?

I apologize in advance, since I am probably doing a very naive mistake in my computation. I am learning about pure (Chow / Grothendieck) motives. One of the first steps is to consider the category ...
57Jimmy's user avatar
  • 533
4 votes
1 answer
273 views

Definition field of weight homomorphism and moduli interpretation of Shimura varieties

In "Canonical models of Shimura curves" by J.S. Milne (avaliable at https://www.jmilne.org/math/articles/2003a.pdf), he explains the definition of quaternion Shimura curve, and explains the modern ...
Zhiyu's user avatar
  • 6,622
8 votes
1 answer
603 views

How much of the category of motives can be recovered from automorphisms of the Betti functor

Say we are working with schemes over a field $k\subset \mathbb{C}.$ A motive in the sense of Voevodsky is a functor $Sch\to D^bVect$ from (an appropriate category of) schemes to the DG category of ...
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
228 views

Motivic integration of an Abelian variety and its dual are same?

Let $A$ be an abelian variety over $\mathbb{C}$ and $A^*$ the dual Abelian variety. The class of $A$ and the class of $A^*$ in $\mathcal{M}_{\mathbb{C}}=K_0(Var_\mathbb{C})[\mathcal{L}^{- 1}]$ are ...
user145752's user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
1k views

When simple cohomological computations predict ingenious algebro-geometric constructions?

Classical algebraic geometry is full of ingenious constructions and miraculous coincidences: 27 lines on a cubic surface are related to Weyl lattice of type $E_6,$ lines on an intersection of four-...
2 votes
0 answers
263 views

Brauer groups and del Pezzo surfaces

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $0$ und let $X$ be a del Pezzo surface over $k$. Note that $X$ may not have points. Let us consider $N:=\ker(\mathrm{Br}(k) \rightarrow \mathrm{Br}(k(X))$. ...
nxir's user avatar
  • 1,479
3 votes
1 answer
249 views

Motivic class of mixed Tate motive

Let $k$ be a field (of characteristic zero), $R$ be a ring and let $X\in DM(k;R)$ be a Tate motive. By definition, this means that $X$ is a summand of an object of the smallest strictly full ...
A.Garcia's user avatar
  • 113
7 votes
1 answer
551 views

Motivation for Suslin’s Rigidity Conjecture

Suslin Rigidity conjecture states that motivic cohomology $$ H_{\mathcal{M}}^1(\operatorname{Spec}(F),\mathbb{Q}(n)) $$ of the field $F$ coincides with motivic cohomology for the subfield of ...
Daniil Rudenko's user avatar
42 votes
0 answers
2k views

Are we better in computing integrals than mathematicians of 19th century?

When I started to learn mathematics, I was fascinating by legendary «Демидович»: problems in mathematical analysis. Fifteen years later, when I open chapters about integrals, I see a long list of ...
6 votes
2 answers
600 views

Why is the triangulated category of motives easier than the abelian one?

There are several expository articles with the title "You could have invented [insert something mysterious here]" (a notable one being about spectral sequences, possibly it even started this genre). ...
user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
304 views

Does the pure motive determine the Voevodsky motive?

I do not quite understand the construction of Voevodsky motives yet. Let $k$ be a field (possibly not algebraically closed), $X$ be a connected smooth projective $k$-scheme. Does the motive of $X$ in ...
user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
569 views

Current status of independence of Betti numbers for different Weil cohomology theories

Previous problem: Is $\operatorname{dim} H^1$ of an abelian variety the same for any Weil cohomology? Let $X$ be an smooth projective variety over a field $k$. For any Weil cohomology theory for ...
Zhiyu's user avatar
  • 6,622
6 votes
1 answer
652 views

$l$-adic periods?

For an algebraic variety $X$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ the comparison isomorphism between Betti and de Rham cohomologies provides the theory of periods with a motivic context whose reformulation as motivic ...
GroGal's user avatar
  • 61
2 votes
0 answers
209 views

Is there literature on a de Rham analogue of the Mumford-Tate group or ell-adic monodromy group?

Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety over $\mathbb{Q}$. The theory of motives predicts that for each cohomology theory, there should be a distinguished Zariski closed subgroup of $GL(H^k_{\bullet}(X)...
Julian Rosen's user avatar
  • 9,061
6 votes
3 answers
1k views

Motives and homotopy theories of algebraic varieties

The theory of motives is an attempt to cope with the fact that there are many reasonable cohomology theories of algebraic varieties. Now, sometimes your cohomology theory does not just give you a ...
user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
492 views

Motives of complex-analytic spaces

In any setting where we have a notion of space and a notion of cohomology theory, we in principle could ask "what are motives in this setting?". In some settings the question can be interesting (i.e. ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
217 views

How to cook up an Artin motive from a positive-dimensional variety

I am trying to make sense of the paper "Eigenvalues of Frobenius and Hodge Numbers" (Kisin--Lehrer). I have not succeeded after some hours of intent staring at the screen. In the proof of Corollary ...
m_for_motive's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
193 views

Motivic strong bellows conjecture

There is a theorem due to Gaifullin--Ignashchenko stating that the Dehn invariant of any flexible polyhedron in the $n$-dimensional Euclidean space ($n\geq 3$) is constant during the flexion. Is ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
372 views

$p$-adic realisation of Kummer motive and Frobenius matrix

Suppose $M$ is an object in the abelian category of mixed Tate motives over $\mathbb{Q}$, and it is an extension of $\mathbb{Q}(0)$ by $\mathbb{Q}(1)$ \begin{equation} 0 \rightarrow \mathbb{Q}(1) \...
Wenzhe's user avatar
  • 2,971
9 votes
0 answers
291 views

Searching for hypergeometric motives that split

Motivation: It seems that the splitting of a hypergeometric motive is closely related to some highly non-trivial hypergeometric identities discovered by Ramanujan, Guillera et al. The splitting of ...
Y. Zhao's user avatar
  • 3,337
7 votes
1 answer
433 views

Is $\operatorname{dim} H^1$ of an abelian variety the same for any Weil cohomology?

Let $A$ be an abelian variety over a field $k$ of dimension $g$, and $H$ be a Weil cohomology theory for smooth projective varieties over $k$ with characteristic $0$ coefficient field $E$. Is it ...
Zhiyu's user avatar
  • 6,622
3 votes
0 answers
182 views

Where is smoothness used in Voevodsky's homotopy theory of schemes? [duplicate]

Let $S$ be a smooth noetherian scheme, and let $Sm/S$ be the category of smooth schemes over $S$. Voevodsky constructs the homotopy category of motives (resp. the stable homotopy category of motives) $...
Exit path's user avatar
  • 3,019
12 votes
1 answer
596 views

An inverse problem for Grothendieck rings of varieties

Suppose $A$ is a given commutative ring, and suppose that one knows that $A$ is isomorphic to the Grothendieck ring of $k$-varieties for some unknown field $k$. Can $k$ be recovered from $A$ ? If ...
THC's user avatar
  • 4,547
6 votes
1 answer
525 views

Functoriality for $\ell$-adic cohomology - a question

This should a be basic enough question, but I’m a little confused. In proving that $H^*(X,\mathbf{Q}_{\ell})$ is functorial (in the sense of Weil cohomology theories: see axiom D2 here) as $X$ ranges ...
user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
306 views

Etale cohomology of projective spaces in the rigid analytic setting

Take $K$ a complete non-archimedean field (maybe algebraically closed, to simplify the question), and $\mathbb{P}_K^d$ the rigid projective space over $K$. Can we compute the étale cohomology with ...
Damien Junger's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
232 views

holomorphic continuation of motivic $L$-functions

The question is rather easy to formulate: when is the $L$-function of a pure motive over $\mathbb{Q}$ expected to have a holomorphic (as opposed to simply meromorphic) continuation to the complex ...
lfu's user avatar
  • 41
8 votes
1 answer
417 views

Motive of a conic without points

Let $C\subset \mathbb{P}^2$ be a smooth conic without $k$-points. Call the Chow $k$-motive in zero-dimensional if it is a sum of $M\mathbb{L}^n$ where $M$ is an Artin motive, i.e. a part of a motive ...
Q. Q.'s user avatar
  • 399
10 votes
2 answers
534 views

A question about the vanishing of motivic cohomology in negative Tate twist

Let $DM_{\text{gm}}$ be the category of Voevodsky´s geometric motives. Let $p,q\in \mathbb{Z}$ be integers with $p<0$. Is it true that $$\text{Hom}_{DM_{\text{gm}}}(M_{\text{gm}}(X),\mathbb{Z}(p)[...
user438991's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
187 views

Artin-Tate chow motives and graded Galois representations

Consider the category $\mathsf{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}$ of rational pure effective chow $k$-motives. The full subcategory of Artin motives (generated by (X,p,0), X smooth projective zero-dimensional, let $...
Q. Q.'s user avatar
  • 399

1
2
3 4 5
8