Questions tagged [adjoint-functors]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
0 answers
67 views

Lax algebras for pseudomonads and monads in Kleisli bicategories for the induced pseudocomonad

In Day–Street's Lax monoids, pseudo-operads, and convolution, they remark without proof: There are general principles involved here. Suppose $(T, m, j)$ is a pseudomonad on any bicategory $\mathcal K$...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
4 votes
0 answers
279 views

Is the restriction of an injective sheaf on a closed subscheme still injective?

Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme, and let $i:Z\to X$ be the inclusion of a closed subscheme $Z$. Let $\mathcal{I}$ be an injective sheaf of modules on $X$. Question. Is $i^*\mathcal{I}$ still an ...
Stabilo's user avatar
  • 1,479
3 votes
1 answer
87 views

Does the right adjoint of a comonad induce the following comodule map?

Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category and $\mathcal{G}=(G,\delta, \epsilon)$ be a comonad on $\mathcal{C}$. Here $G: \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{C}$ is a functor, $\delta: G\to G^2$ and $\epsilon: G\to id_{\...
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 8,707
7 votes
1 answer
1k views

Reference request: Who first proved that right adjoints preserve limits?

One of the most famous and unifying theorems in category theory is that right adjoints preserve limits. I wonder: Who was the first one to prove this fact? The notion of adjoint functors is, of course,...
user907616's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
263 views

All functors "are" left adjoints, and applications?

Throughout this thread, let us assume smallness. All functors "are" left adjoints Let $D \xrightarrow{F} C$ be any functor, which induces $$ D \xrightarrow{F} \hat{C}$$ by compositing the ...
Student's user avatar
  • 5,038
7 votes
3 answers
384 views

Yves Diers's thesis ("Catégories localisables")

I am looking for a copy of Yves Diers's 1977 thesis Catégories localisables, which is the original reference for "multi-" category theory, such as multi-adjoints, multi-colimits, and so on. ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
7 votes
3 answers
446 views

Prof and the completion of Cat under right adjoints

In Bénabou's Les distributeurs, in which the bicategory of profunctors is introduced, Bénabou remarks (page 17, quoted below) that $\mathbf{Prof}$ may be viewed as the construction of a bicategory ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
10 votes
1 answer
440 views

Characterization of functors whose right adjoint is monadic?

Let $F: \mathcal A^\to_\leftarrow \mathcal B: U$ be an adjunction, and suppose we want to know whether the comparision functor $\mathcal B \to Alg^{UF}$ is an equivalence, where $Alg^{UF}$ is the ...
Tim Campion's user avatar
  • 61.5k
5 votes
1 answer
222 views

Non-uniqueness of $C$ with $f_!(C) = f_*(1_{\mathcal{C}})$

$\newcommand{\Cc}{\mathcal{C}}$ $\newcommand{\Dd}{\mathcal{D}}$ $\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}$ $\newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}}$ $\newcommand{\tensor}{\otimes}$ $\newcommand{\colim}{\rm colim}$ $\...
Bastiaan Cnossen's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
172 views

Sober spaces vs. spatial frames-a big picture

For any topological space $X$ one can consider the so called frame of all open subsets of $X$ to be denoted by $\mathcal{O}(X)$. If $f:X \to Y$ is continuous taking the inverse image we get the ...
truebaran's user avatar
  • 9,150
6 votes
1 answer
489 views

Which direction of the adjoint functor theorem is most useful?

In the daily life of a working mathematician which direction of the adjoint functor theorem is more useful? Unpacking, does one find it more useful to: a) prove that a functor admits an adjoint and ...
Dick Johnson's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
87 views

$\Gamma: \mathcal C \to \text{Fun}(\mathcal Z, \mathcal C)$ has a left adjoint iff all $F \in \text{Fun}(\mathcal Z, \mathcal C)$ has a colimit

Let $\mathcal Z$ be a small category and $\mathcal C$ any category. We then consider the category $\text{Fun}(\mathcal Z, \mathcal C)$ the category of functors from $\mathcal Z$ to $\mathcal C$ and ...
Falcon's user avatar
  • 410
12 votes
1 answer
382 views

Can the category of S-local objects be reflective but not a localization by S?

This is cross-posted from MSE (and substantially re-written) after receiving no answers. Suppose $\mathcal C$ is a category and $S \subseteq \operatorname{Mor}(\mathcal C)$ is some collection of ...
sarahzrf's user avatar
  • 295
18 votes
2 answers
1k views

Monoidal categories whose tensor has a left adjoint

Is there a name for monoidal categories $(\mathscr V, \otimes, I)$ such that $\otimes$ has a left adjoint $(\ell, r) : \mathscr V \to \mathscr V^2$? Have they been studied anywhere? What are some ...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
3 votes
1 answer
513 views

Question about adjoint of forgetful functor from condensed abelian groups to condensed sets

There is a forgetful functor from condensed abelian groups to condensed sets. According to Scholze's notes, this has an adjoint $T \mapsto \mathbb{Z}[T]$ (which is the sheafification of the functor ...
Sofía Marlasca Aparicio's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
479 views

A specific property of bi-adjunction

Let $$I: C \rightleftarrows D: F$$ be biadjoint [1] functors between categories $C, D$. That is, $I$ is the left and also the right adjoint of $F$ (thus vice versa). Put in notations, it's $$ \cdots \...
Student's user avatar
  • 5,038
2 votes
1 answer
462 views

Does a natural transformation of functors induce a natural transformation between their right adjoints?

Let $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ be two categories and $F$ and $G: \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ be two functors. Suppose $F$ and $G$ have right adjoints $F^{\wedge}$ and $G^{\wedge}: \mathcal{D}\to ...
Zhaoting Wei's user avatar
  • 8,707
0 votes
0 answers
84 views

Left/right adjoints to core/Cartesian inclusions

Let $p:E\to B$ be a fibration and let $Cart(E)$ denote the subcategory of $E$ with all objects but only Cartesian arrows. Since all isomorphisms in $E$ are Cartesian, we naturally have inclusion ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,009
2 votes
1 answer
196 views

When is a finitary functor induced by Ind (co)continuous

Let $\mathbf C$ and $\mathbf D$ be small categories. $\mathrm{Ind}(\mathbf C)$ is an accessible category (by definition), and is locally finitely presentable (i.e. cocomplete, or equivalently complete)...
varkor's user avatar
  • 8,755
5 votes
0 answers
117 views

Is the group Hopf algebra left and right adjoint?

Suppose that $G$ is a group and $k$ is a field. Then it is well known that the group ring (group algebra) functor $k[\bullet]$ is left adjoint to the group of units functor, the latter of which ...
Mark.Neuhaus's user avatar
  • 2,014
11 votes
2 answers
944 views

How to understand adjoint functors?

I asked this same question on MathUnderflow two weeks ago but didn't receive any answer. Now that I am thinking more, it feels like the most suitable place for this question is here. I have a good ...
Bumblebee's user avatar
  • 1,019
1 vote
1 answer
136 views

Has the covariant Hom-functor of the category of additive categories a left adjoint?

Let $\mathsf{Add}$ denote the (strict) 2-category of small additive categories and additive functors. Because categories of additive functors are itself additive, we have for each additive category $\...
Lucina's user avatar
  • 111
2 votes
1 answer
214 views

Admissibility of intersection of subcategories

Let $\mathscr{T}$ be a triangulated category, and $\mathscr{A}$ be a right admissible subcategory, which means that $i_{\mathscr{A}} : \mathscr{A} \rightarrow \mathscr{T}$ has a right adjoint $i_{\...
Federico Barbacovi's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
176 views

Adjunctions capturing duality between ideals and saturated monoids in a commutative ring?

Let $R$ be a commutative ring. A saturated monoid in $R$ is a multiplicative submonoid $S\subset R$ which is closed under divisors, i.e $xy\in S\implies x\in S$. This is the converse of the analogous ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 10.3k
1 vote
0 answers
413 views

Oplax monoidal functors of $\infty$-categories

In Higher Algebra, a notion of lax symmetric monoidal functors (in what follows, I'll remove the adjective "symmetric", but I'm mainly interested in the symmetric situation) is defined : if you have ...
Maxime Ramzi's user avatar
  • 13.6k
2 votes
0 answers
117 views

Does the functor sending a DGA to its zeroth component admit a right adjoint?

Let $A$ be a ring and write $\underline{A}^\bullet$ for the associated trivial DGA. We have a functor $$\mathrm{ev}_0\colon\mathbf{dgAlg}_{\underline{A}^\bullet}\longrightarrow\mathbf{Alg}_A$$ sending ...
Emily's user avatar
  • 10.7k
7 votes
0 answers
615 views

What is the left adjoint to base change of schemes?

Restriction of Scalars and Functoriality of Presheaves. Let $\phi\colon R\longrightarrow S$ be a morphism of rings. There is associated to $\phi$ a natural functor from $\mathrm{Alg}_S$ to $\mathrm{...
Emily's user avatar
  • 10.7k
14 votes
2 answers
2k views

Notation for "the" left adjoint functor

As far as I know, there is no "official" notation for the left adjoint of a functor $F : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ if it exists. I have seen the notation $F^*$ sometimes, but this looks only nice ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
452 views

Subfunctor of internal Hom

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a Hopf algebra over $\mathbb{C}$. Let $\textrm{mod}_\mathcal{H}$ be the monoidal abelian category of finite-dimensional modules over $\mathcal{H}$. Fix $X\in\textrm{Obj}(\textrm{...
cl4y70n____'s user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
421 views

Left and right Kan extensions

Let $F:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{D}$ be a functor between small categories. We define the functor \begin{align*} f:\hat{\mathcal{D}}&\longrightarrow\hat{\mathcal{C}} \\ G&\longmapsto G\circ F^{\...
richarddedekind's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
452 views

Adjoints for radical and socle functors

Let $R$ be a ring and $M$ be a $R$-module. Let $rad(M)$ be the radical of $M$, that is, the intersection of all maximal submodules of $M$. Moreover, let $soc(M)$ be the socle of $M$, that is, the sum ...
cl4y70n____'s user avatar
21 votes
1 answer
2k views

Surmounting set-theoretical difficulties in algebraic geometry

The category $\text{AffSch}_S$ of affine schemes over some base affine scheme $S$ is not essentially small. This lends itself to certain set-theoretical difficulties when working with a category $Sh(\...
Exit path's user avatar
  • 2,969
2 votes
0 answers
82 views

Reference request for (co-)free constructions

Following a comment of user131781, posted to an answer of this question on MO, I am looking for references to the construction of (co)-free functors from categories into the category of Banach spaces ...
ABIM's user avatar
  • 4,969
3 votes
0 answers
85 views

Do adjoints of enriched functors preserve the enriched structure?

Is there is any reason in general for adjoints of enriched functors to preserve the enriched structure of categories? The specific example I'm thinking of is the following: Fix a commutative ring $R$...
Kim's user avatar
  • 4,114
1 vote
0 answers
212 views

Existence of free functor to Banach spaces

Is there a "non-trivial" characterization of the concrete categories admitting and adjoint pair of functors $F \dashv G$ were $G$ is defined on the category sBan of separable Banach spaces and bounded ...
ABIM's user avatar
  • 4,969
7 votes
2 answers
973 views

CG spaces from the perspective of sheaves over compact Hausdorff spaces

A compactly generated space is a space $X$ such that $f : X \rightarrow Y$ is continuous if and only if $K \rightarrow X \stackrel{f}{\rightarrow} Y$ is continuous for each compact hausdorff space $K$....
user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
269 views

Does every functor between Grothendieck categories have adjoints?

Let $F:\mathcal C\longrightarrow \mathcal D$ be an additive functor that preserves colimits. Suppose that $\mathcal C$ and $\mathcal D$ are Grothendieck categories. Does $F$ have a right adjoint? ...
Operadbeginner's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
722 views

Reference request: The unit of an adjunction of $\infty$-categories in the sense of Riehl-Verity is a unit in the sense of Lurie

I'm looking for a reference (or proof) for the statement given in the title: that when we have an adjunction between quasicategories in the sense of Riehl and Verity (defined e.g. in Section 4 of ...
Robin Stoll's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
529 views

When does the forgetful functor from modules to vector spaces have a right adjoint?

Given any algebra $R,$ when does the forgetful functor $R\text{-}Mod \rightarrow Vec$ have a right adjoint? Does this imply any finiteness conditions on R? Is there a book/paper discussing this? I'...
AMaths's user avatar
  • 91
10 votes
0 answers
309 views

Adjoints to forcing

Forcing over a partial order $P$ can be viewed in a category theoretic sense as constructing the presheaf topos ${\bf Set}^{P^{op}}$ over the partial order (viewed as a category) then passing through ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,009
7 votes
2 answers
982 views

Semantics-structure adjunction

In the discussion on the nLab article for monadic adjunctions, John Baez suggests and Mike Shulman confirms that the relationship between adjunctions and monads itself constitutes an adjunction called ...
Alec Rhea's user avatar
  • 9,009
10 votes
4 answers
2k views

Upgrade adjunction to equivalence

I'm studying category theory by myself and I just came across this sentence from Wikipedia: An adjunction between categories C and D is somewhat akin to a "weak form" of an equivalence between C and ...
user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
157 views

For which topological spaces does pullback along $\operatorname{ev}_0:B^I\to B$ have a right adjoint?

Let $B$ be a topological space. Consider the evaluation at zero of paths in $B$. This is a continuous map $\operatorname{ev}_0:B^I\to B$ where the domain carries the compact-open topology. For which ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 10.3k
3 votes
0 answers
287 views

How are the unit/counit of a Hopf algebra and of an categorical adjunction related?

For categories $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$, a pair of functors $\mathcal{C} \xrightarrow{\;L\;} \mathcal{D}$ and $\mathcal{C} \xleftarrow{\;R\;} \mathcal{D}\,$ are an adjoint pair if we have ...
Mike Pierce's user avatar
  • 1,149
1 vote
1 answer
275 views

Commutativity between functors on sheaves of abelian groups

I am trying to understand certain properties of sheaf theory, but I'm having trouble finding the notions to answer my questions. I'd be really glad if someone could help me with the following. Let $f :...
BrianT's user avatar
  • 1,197
-2 votes
2 answers
284 views

Adjunctions between Groupoids and Hilbert spaces

I am interested in any adjunctions between any of the familiar categories of Groupoids and the category of finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. Do any exist? Are there any well know monads on the ...
Ben Sprott's user avatar
  • 1,319
3 votes
1 answer
236 views

Question on Eilenberg-Watts theorem

I'm not sure if this is a research level question, but: Let $F:Rep_A \to Rep_B$ be an exact cocomplete functor between representation categories of finite dimensional $k$ algebras, where $k$ has ...
Bipolar Minds's user avatar
8 votes
2 answers
916 views

Explicit expression of the unstraightening functor

Hard as I tried, I couldn't find a proof of Remark 2.2.2.11 in Higher Topos Theory, or prove it myself. It seems to need an explicit formulation for the unstraightening functor, so my question is: is ...
Madio's user avatar
  • 93
8 votes
1 answer
1k views

Adjoints of scalar extension and scalar coextension

Let $h\colon R\rightarrow S$ be a morphism of commutative rings. We consider the following functors (I am aware that the notations may be different in other contexts): $h^*$: Scalar extension by ...
Fred Rohrer's user avatar
  • 6,670
8 votes
2 answers
457 views

"Equivalence" is to "group" as "adjoint" is to ....?

The collection of all self-equivalences of a category $C$ constitutes a $2$-group, which is a categorification of the notion of a group. My question is about what happens when one replaces ...
user85913's user avatar
  • 830