Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
111 votes
0 answers
17k views

A proof of $\dim(R[T])=\dim(R)+1$ without prime ideals?

Please read this first before answering. This question is only concerned with a proof of the dimension formula using the Coquand-Lombardi characterization below. If you post something that doesn't ...
Martin Brandenburg's user avatar
31 votes
2 answers
2k views

Should Krull dimension be a cardinal?

A totally ordered finite set $\quad \mathcal P_0 \varsubsetneq \mathcal P_1\varsubsetneq \dots \mathcal \varsubsetneq \mathcal P_n \quad$ of prime ideals of a ring $A$ is said to be a chain of ...
Georges Elencwajg's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
385 views

An infinite dimensional local domain whose chains of primes are finite

Does there exist a local domain of infinite dimension in which every chain of prime ideals is finite? Of course, such a ring must be neither noetherian nor catenary. (This question arose while ...
Fred Rohrer's user avatar
  • 6,700
1 vote
1 answer
92 views

On analytic transcendence degree and Krull dimension for homomorphic images of power series rings

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and $I$ be a radical ideal of $k[[x_1,\ldots, x_n]]$. Let $P$ be a minimal prime ideal of the reduced ring $R:=k[[x_1,\ldots, x_n]]/I$. Then, $R_P$ is a field ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 480
0 votes
1 answer
269 views

Valuation ring satisfying either a.c.c. or d.c.c. on prime ideals

If a commutative ring with unity has finite Krull dimension, then it satisfies a.c.c. and d.c.c. on prime ideals. The converse is not true in general, as can be seen from here An infinite dimensional ...
user521337's user avatar
  • 1,209