Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers
189 views

Relation between push forward by diagonal morphism and higher direct image functors

Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism between two Noetherian schemes. Then $f_*$(respect to $R^1f_*$) sends coherent sheaves to coherent sheaves if and only if $f$ is universally closed (respect to ...
Doyoung Choi's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
416 views

Are these two "FUNCTORS" adjoint?

I am considering the following correspondence: Let $X$ be quasi compact quasi separated schemes.Consider a pseudo functor \begin{equation}Sch\rightarrow CAT :U\mapsto Qcoh(U),f:U\rightarrow V\mapsto f^...
user41650's user avatar
  • 1,982
16 votes
2 answers
3k views

If the direct image of f preserves coherent sheaves on noetherian schemes, how to show f is proper?

The other direction is well known. I think it is true and I was told by several other guys doing algebraic geometry that it is indeed true but they did not know how to prove. I am also wondering ...
user41650's user avatar
  • 1,982
11 votes
1 answer
537 views

Why does this setting imply that a category is Grothendieck?

I came across the following Lemma in Mitsuyasu Hashimoto's Equivariant Twisted Inverses; it is Lemma 11.2 on page 107 of this pdf. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category which satisfies the (AB3) ...
Tobias Sitte's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
1k views

Finite separable extension of fields imply the number of intermediate subfield is finite

The proof of statements either uses Galois theory or Artin primitive element theorem.I would like to know whether there is a proof without using these.The reason to avoid using Galois theory is that ...
user41650's user avatar
  • 1,982