(Remark: I first asked this question at math.stackexchange. As it received no answer, I'm posting it here).

Suppose $A$ and $B$ are commutative rings. Let $A\to B$ be a surjective ring homomorphism. I will denote by $D(A)$ and $D(B)$ the derived categories of unbounded complexes over $A$ and $B$.

Suppose $M,N \in D(B)$ are two complexes over $B$. Let $F:D(B)\to D(A)$ be the forgetfull functor.

Suppose that we know that $F(M) \cong F(N)$. Does it follows that $M\cong N$ in $D(B)$?

If we had a quasi-isomorphism $F(M) \to F(N)$, then it will of course lift to $D(B)$, because since $A\to B$ is surjective, an $A$-linear map of complexes over $B$ will automatically be $B$-linear.

However, isomorphisms in the derived category might pass through a third object $K$, which might not be defined over $B$. Thus, I suspect the answer to my question is no, but I have no idea how to find a counterexample.

Thank you for any idea!

| cite | improve this question | | | | |

Let $A=k[x]$ and $B=k[x]/(x^2)$, let $X$ be the complex $\hskip{.1in}\dots\to 0 \to B\stackrel{x}{\to} B\to 0\to \dots$, and let $Y$ be $\hskip{.1in}\dots\to 0\to k\stackrel{0}{\to}k\to 0\to\dots$. Then $X$ and $Y$ are isomorphic in $D(A)$, but not in $D(B)$.

The point is that $X$ is isomorphic to the third object in a triangle containing a map $\zeta:k\to k[2]$, where $\zeta$ represents an element in the kernel of $\operatorname{Ext}^2_B(k,k)\to\operatorname{Ext}^2_A(k,k)$.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.