Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.


I've read that if $N_0$ has a topological generator $\gamma$, then its continuous cohomology on some vector space can be computed by the complex $$V \overset{\gamma-1}{\longrightarrow} V$$

If someone knows why...? Thanks !

edit : $N_0$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_p$ and by topological generator I mean an element which generate a dense subgroup (here $1$)

share|improve this question
What is $N_0$?, what is a topological generator?, where did you read it? –  Mauricio May 31 '12 at 1:10
I am editing the details. –  Arkandias May 31 '12 at 3:32
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Well, if you consider the definition of cohomology, you see that $H^0(N_0,V)$ are the fixed point, namely $v\in V$ such that $gv=v$ for all $g\in N_0$ (which, I suppose, is your group). If the group were cyclic, all $g$ would be of the form $\gamma^k$ for some $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ so $gv=v$ for all $g$ if and only if $\gamma v=v$: since you speak about continuous cohomology the action of $N_0$ on $V$ must be continuous, and the argument goes through. We then see that $H^0(N_o,V)=\mathrm{ker}(\gamma-1)$. To see that $H^1(N_0,V)=V/(\gamma-1)$ and $H^q(N_0,V)=0$ for higher $q$ is slightly more involved. The first isomorphism can be obtained by writing $$ H^1(N_0,V)=\varinjlim_k H^1(N_0/N_0^k,V^{N_0^k})\cong \varinjlim_k \hat{H}^{-1}(N_0/N_0^k,V^{N_0^k}) $$ where I denoted by $\hat{H}$ Tate cohomology, for which we have an isomorphism $\hat{H}^1\cong \hat{H}^{-1}$ in the case of finite cyclic groups. This can be computed explicitely: namely, if $G$ is finite cyclic generated by $\gamma$ acting on $M$, we have $$ \hat{H}^{-1}(G,M)=\mathrm{ker}(\mathrm{Norm}_G)/(\gamma-1)M $$

For higher $q$, the point is that a topologically cyclic group is of cohomological dimension $1$: you can see this in Serre's book on Galois cohomology.

share|improve this answer
thank you ! I'll look into Serre's book. –  Arkandias May 31 '12 at 3:49
@Filippo: Sorry, but your formula for $H^1$ is wrong, since it has to be an inductive limit (and it should be noted that $k$ runs through $p$-powers). In general, if $G$ is profinite: $$H^n(G,M) = \varinjlim_U\; H^n(G/U;M^U)$$ where $U$ runs through the open normal subgroups of $G$. –  Ralph May 31 '12 at 10:16
Of course, you are perfectly right, I edited my answer. –  Filippo Alberto Edoardo Jun 1 '12 at 4:11
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.