10
$\begingroup$

For a tuple of integers $\underline{s}:=(s_1,\dots, s_d)$, the multiple zeta value (MZV) at $\underline{s}$ is defined as: $$ \zeta(s_1,\dots, s_d):= \sum_{n_1>\dots>n_d>0}\frac 1 {n_1^{s_1}\dots n_d^{s_d}}.$$

In all the references I have seen, people restrict to tuples $\underline{s}$ such that $s_1 > 1$ and $s_i \geq 1$ for all $i\geq 2$, mentionning convergence of the series.

However, it seems to me that this series converges as soon as $s_1>1$, $s_1+s_2>2$, \dots, $s_1 + \dots s_d>d$ which allows more MZV at integers. For example, $\zeta(5,-1)$ converges.

My question is twofold:

1) Have these MZV at "negative integers" been studied and are they "number theoretically interesting"?

2)I also understand that there should be a reason to exclude these values and that they don't fit in the general philosophy about MZV. For example, we would have a non trivial relation such as $\zeta(s,0)=\zeta(s-1) -\zeta(s)$ between MZV of different weights. (The weight of $\underline{s}$ is by definition $s_1+\dots s_d$. As far as I understood, the general belief is that all relations between MZV are generated by relations between MZV of the same weight but I don't think that the one above can.)

Is there an a priori good reason to restrict to positive integers?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I was under the impression that negative input values are also sometimes considered by using some kind of regularization. Unfortunately, I don't have a reference. $\endgroup$ – S. Carnahan May 22 '12 at 8:40
  • $\begingroup$ I think Goncharov's article on periods and mixed motives doesn't restrict to positive integers. $\endgroup$ – Gjergji Zaimi May 22 '12 at 8:57
  • $\begingroup$ @S. Carnahan: as far as I understand, regularization has to do with giving a meaning to diverging series sur as $\zeta(1,2)$. But the series I refer to do converge. $\endgroup$ – Oblomov May 22 '12 at 12:29
2
$\begingroup$

In response to 1: Yes, these have been studied, for example, in Multiple zeta values at non-positive integers (2001) and (2014), see also The first derivative multiple zeta values at non-positive integers (2010) and Analytic continuation of multiple zeta-functions and the asymptotic behavior at non-positive integers (2013).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.