Qiaochu asked this in the comments to this question. Since this is really his question, not mine, I will make this one Community Wiki. In MR0522147, Dyson mentions the generating function $\tau(n)$ given by $$ \sum_{n=1}^\infty \tau(n)\,x^n = x\prod_{m=1}^\infty (1 - x^m)^{24} = \eta(x)^{24}, $$ which is apparently of interest to the number theorists ($\eta$ is Dedekind's function). He mentions the following formula for $\tau$: $$\tau(n) = \frac{1}{1!\,2!\,3!\,4!} \sum \prod_{1 \leq i < j \leq 5} (x_i - x_j)$$ where the sum ranges over $5$-tuples $(x_1,\dots,x_5)$ of integers satisfying $x_i \equiv i \mod 5$, $\sum x_i = 0$, and $\sum x_i^2 = 10n$. Apparently, the $5$ and $10$ are because this formula comes from some identity of $\eta(x)^{10}$. Dyson mentions that there are similar formulas coming from identities with $\eta(x)^d$ when $d$ is on the list $d = 3, 8, 10, 14,15, 21, 24, 26, 28, 35, 36, \dots$. The list is exactly the dimensions of the simple Lie algebras, except for the number $26$, which doesn't have a good explanation. The explanation of the others is in I. G. Macdonald, Affine root systems and Dedekind's $\eta$-function, Invent. Math. 15 (1972), 91--143, MR0357528, and the reviewer at MathSciNet also mentions that the explanation for $d=26$ is lacking.

So: in the last almost-40 years, has the $d=26$ case explained?

  • $\begingroup$ If somebody gets the chance, please add links to the mentioned articles to make them easier to get to (at least if you're working from a university computer where you have journal access). $\endgroup$ Dec 25, 2009 at 7:25
  • $\begingroup$ Interestingly, the number 26 appears also as a number of 'sporadic' finite simple groups (i.e. not fitting into the infinite series of groups of Lie type, cyclic and alternative). $\endgroup$
    – mathreader
    Dec 25, 2009 at 7:27
  • $\begingroup$ One would expect 26 the critical central charge of the Virasoro algebra to be more relevant here than 26 the number of sporadic finite simple groups, I guess. $\endgroup$ Dec 25, 2009 at 12:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Anton: Sorry, I thought the MR numbers sufficed. $\endgroup$ Dec 25, 2009 at 16:37

1 Answer 1


The case of $d=26$ is related to the exceptional Lie algebra $F_4$. Let me quote from the 1980 paper by Monastyrsky which was originally published as a supplement to the Russian translation of the Dyson's paper:

A more careful study of Macdonald's article reveals that the identity for the 26th power of $\eta(x)$ is not really such a mystery. It is related to the exceptional group $F_4$ of dimension 52, where the space of dual roots $F_4^V$ and the space of roots $F_4$ are not the same. Thus, there are two distinct identities associated with $F_4$, one for $\eta^{52} (x)$ and the other for $\eta^{26} (x)$. A similar situation prevails in the case of the algebra $G_2$ of dimension 14, which yields identities for $\eta^{14} (x)$ and $\eta^{7} (x)$. The identities for $\eta^{26} (x)$ and $\eta^{7} (x)$ are considerably more complicated.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.