4
$\begingroup$

Given two path algebras $A$ and $B$, for example, A=: $1\to2$ B=: $1\to2\to3$, is the tensor product of A and B over a field $k$ a path algebra? if yes, how to represent it by a quiver? also, how to construct $(A,B)$-bimodules?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ 1) Paths algebras (over non-trivial quivers) have homological dimension $1$, while the tensor product of two path algebras has homological dimension $\geq 2$, so it is not a path algebra 2) What kind of question is this? There are free bimodules and any other bimodule is a quotient of a free one. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2012 at 10:25

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

It can be realized as a quotient of the Cartesian product of path algebras in question. You have to mod out by some commutativity relations.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How does that work? Specifically, which element in the tensor product would be the image of the element $(a,b)$ of the Cartesian product? The "obvious" choice, $a\otimes b$ won't work, because addition in the Cartesian product ($(a,b)+(c,d)=(a+c,b+d)$) doesn't match addition in the tensor product, so you won't have a homomorphism. (Multiplication by scalars from $k$ doesn't match either unless $k$ is the two-element field.) $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2012 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ I think he means take the Cartesian product of the quivers and then put in commutativity relations. For instance, if you take the quiver 1->2 and take the tensor product of this path algebra with itself you get the incidence algebra of the diamond 1 / \ a b \ / 0 The Hasse diagram is the quiver of this algebra, but you have the relation that the two paths to the top are the same. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2012 at 21:12
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, my picture of the Hasse diagram of a diamond didn't draw well in the comments. $\endgroup$ Commented May 9, 2012 at 21:13
1
$\begingroup$

What you want is

here.

Basically you take the 1-skeleton of the products of the quivers and you say that certain paths e.g. (edge,vertex)(vertex,edge)=(vertex,edge)(edge,vertex).

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .